Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: Siblings of children with cancer are a psychosocially at-risk group and have unmet needs that are typically not addressed within traditional hospital settings. The current study implemented a community-academic partnership model with SuperSibs—a nationwide, community-based, no-cost program for siblings of children with cancer, powered by Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation—to evaluate and improve their sibling resources. Method: Researchers and Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation staff partnered to plan and conduct research with siblings regarding desired support resources, with attention to the acceptability and feasibility of implementation. Siblings (N = 23) provided qualitative data regarding suggestions for new resources and feedback on existing and proposed SuperSibs programs. Qualitative data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Results: Siblings emphasize the importance of support that is meaningful, age-appropriate, consistently delivered and that offers autonomy. Siblings recommended revised SuperSibs program initiatives, such as yoga instruction, education for parents and teachers, and game-based interventions. Collaboration throughout the course of the research between researchers and Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation staff yielded improvements to SuperSibs programming. Conclusion: Community-academic partnerships are useful in conducting impactful research that is directly translatable into community-based support. Recommendations continue to inform resource development and evaluation goals.

Implications for Impact Statement

Siblings of children with cancer are a psychosocially at-risk group that receives limited support within traditional hospital settings. This project implemented a community-academic partnership to design and conduct qualitative research aimed at improving community-based sibling support resources from SuperSibs, a free program offered by Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation. Findings suggest that the community-academic partnership model has strong potential to improve evidence-based support for siblings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderfer

M. A.

Goldish

(2017, October). Setting an agenda for advocacy, research, and care for siblings of children with cancer. Poster presented at the Annual Congress of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP), Washington, DC.

Alderfer

M. A.

Kazak

A. E.

(2006). Family issues when a child is on treatment for cancer. In Brown

R. T.

(Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of childhood cancer and sickle cell disease: A biopsychosocial approach (pp. 53–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Drahota

Meza

R. D.

Brikho

Naaf

Estabillo

J. A.

Gomez

E. D.

. . . Aarons

G. A.

(2016). Community-academic partnerships: A systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Quarterly, 94, 163–214. 10.1111/1468-0009.12184

Gerhardt

C. A.

Lehmann

Long

K. A.

Alderfer

M. A.

(2015). Supporting siblings as a standard of care in pediatric oncology. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(Suppl. 5), S750–S804. 10.1002/pbc.25821

Guest

MacQueen

K. M.

Namey

E. E.

(2012). Applied thematic analysis. New York, NY: Sage. 10.4135/9781483384436

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Thielke

Payne

Gonzalez

Conde

J. G.

(2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42, 377–381. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

Houtzager

B. A.

Grootenhuis

M. A.

Last

B. F.

(2001). Supportive groups for siblings of pediatric oncology patients: Impact on anxiety. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 315–324. 10.1002/pon.528

QSR International . (2017). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 11). Melbourne, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd.

Israel

B. A.

Schulz

A. J.

Parker

E. A.

Becker

A. B.

(1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173

10.

Jenholt Nolbris

Enskär

Hellström

A. L.

(2014). Grief related to the experience of being the sibling of a child with cancer. Cancer Nursing, 37, E1–E7.

11.

Kozlowska

Hanney

(2001). An art therapy group for children traumatized by parental violence and separation. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 6, 49–78. 10.1177/1359104501006001006

12.

Long

K. A.

Goldish

Lown

E. A.

Ostrowski

N. L.

Alderfer

M. A.

Marsland

A. L.

. . . Ewing

L. J.

(2015). Major lessons learned from a nationally-based community-academic partnership: Addressing sibling adjustment to childhood cancer. Families, Systems & Health, 33, 61–67. 10.1037/fsh0000084

13.

Long

K. A.

Lehmann

Gerhardt

C. A.

Carpenter

A. L.

Marsland

A. L.

Alderfer

M. A.

(2018). Psychosocial functioning and risk factors among siblings of children with cancer: An updated systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 27, 1467–1479. 10.1002/pon.4669

14.

Long

K. A.

Marsland

A. L.

Wright

Hinds

(2015). Creating a tenuous balance: Siblings’ experience of a brother’s or sister’s childhood cancer diagnosis. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 32, 21–31. 10.1177/1043454214555194

15.

Long

K. A.

Pariseau

E. M.

Muriel

A. C.

Chu

Kazak

A. E.

Leon

Alderfer

M. A.

(2017). Psychosocial screening for siblings of children with cancer: Barriers and preferences. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 5, 364–375. 10.1037/cpp0000219

16.

Morse

Barrett

Mayan

Olson

Spiers

(2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 13–22. 10.1177/160940690200100202

17.

O’Shea

E. R.

Shea

Robert

Cavanaugh

(2012). The needs of siblings of children with cancer: A nursing perspective. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 29, 221–231. 10.1177/1043454212451365

18.

Patterson

Millar

Visser

(2011). The development of an instrument to assess the unmet needs of young people who have a sibling with cancer: Piloting the Sibling Cancer Needs Instrument (SCNI). Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 28, 16–26. 10.1177/1043454210377174

19.

Prchal

Landolt

M. A.

(2009). Psychological interventions with siblings of pediatric cancer patients: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 1241–1251. 10.1002/pon.1565

20.

Scialla

M. A.

Canter

K. S.

Chen

F. F.

Kolb

E. A.

Sandler

Wiener

Kazak

A. E.

(2018).Delivery of care consistent with the psychosocial standards in pediatric cancer: Current practices in the United States. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 65, e26869. 10.1002/pbc.26869

21.

Stueck

Gloeckner

(2005). Yoga for children in the mirror of the science: Working spectrum and practice fields of the training of relaxation with elements of yoga for children. Early Child Development and Care, 175, 371–377. 10.1080/0300443042000230537

22.

Wiener

Battles

Mamalian

Zadeh

(2011). ShopTalk: A pilot study of the feasibility and utility of a therapeutic board game for youth living with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19, 1049–1054. 10.1007/s00520-011-1130-z

23.

Williams

L. K.

McCarthy

M. C.

Eyles

D. J.

Drew

(2013). Parenting a child with cancer: Perceptions of adolescents and parents of adolescents and younger children following completion of childhood cancer treatment. Journal of Family Studies, 19, 80–89. 10.5172/jfs.2013.19.1.80

24.

Y. P.

Thompson

Aroian

K. J.

McQuaid

E. L.

Deatrick

J. A.

(2016). Commentary: Writing and evaluating qualitative research reports. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 41, 493–505. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw032

Improving Support to Siblings of Children With Cancer Through a Community-Academic Partnership

Abstract

Implications for Impact Statement

Get full access to this article

References