Pornography and romance, at first glance they seem to be two genres that are almost polar opposites. Yet both are the products of our evolved human sexuality and both have been the subjects of a variety of authors and researchers. Particularly in the case of pornography, some have argued strongly against its very existence, charging it, its creators and consumers with many of the evils in the world (real and imagined). In the case of romance, many have been derogatory and dismissive of the writers' skills and the readers' minds. In this article, I hope to introduce a different approach to these genres, through an evolutionary lens that serves to illuminate the way in which our sexual natures combined with modern technology to create such widespread distribution and sales. Romance and pornography are both multibillion dollar industries, and their stark contrasts reflect the deep divide at the heart of male and female erotic fantasies. These differences reflect the fact that the selection pressures males and females faced in the reproductive realm over human evolutionary history were not identical.
ArcandB. (1991). The Jaguar and the Anteater: Pornography and the Modern World. New York: McClelland & Stewart, Inc.
2.
BarberN. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
3.
BaronL. (1990). Pornography and gender equality: An empirical analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 363–380.
4.
BrosiusH. B., WeaverJ. B., & StaabJ. F. (1993). Exploring the social and sexual “reality” of contemporary pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 161–170. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551697
5.
BrownmillerS. (1976). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York, NY: Bantam.
6.
BussD. M., AbbottM., AngleitnerA., AsherianA., BiaggioA., … YangK.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47. doi: 10.1177/0022022190211001
7.
BussD. M., & SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
8.
BussD. M., ShackelfordT. K., KirkpatrickL. A., & LarsenR. J. (2001). A half century of American mate preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 491–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x
9.
BussD. M., & ShackelfordT. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193–221. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175
10.
CampD. (1997). The role of the romance novel. In GallagherR. & EstradaR. C., Writing romances: A handbook by the Romance Writers of America (pp. 46–53). Cincinnati, OH: Writer's Digest Books.
11.
ChiversM. L., SetoM. C., LalumiereM. L., LaanE., & GrimbosT. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9
12.
ColesC. D., & ShampJ. S. (1984). Some sexual, personality, and demographic characteristics of women readers of erotic romances. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 187–209. doi: 10.1007/BF01541647
13.
ConferJ. C., PerillouxC., & BussD. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: Men's priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 348–353. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.002
14.
CourtiolA., RamondM., GodelleB., & FerdyJ. (2010). Mate choice and human stature: Homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mate preferences. Evolution, 64, 2189–2203.
15.
CoxA., & FisherM. (2009). The Texas billionaire's pregnant bride: An evolutionary interpretation of romance fiction titles. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 386–401.
16.
CroninB. (2008). Eros unbound: Pornography and the Internet. In AspreyW. & CeruzziP., The Internet and American business: An historic investigation (pp. 491–528). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
17.
DaviesK. A. (1997). Voluntary exposure to pornography and men's attitudes toward feminism and rape. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 131–137. doi: 10.1080/00224499709551877
18.
DiamondM. (2009). Pornography, public acceptance, and sex related crime: A review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.06.004
19.
DiamondM., JozifkovaE., & WeissP. (2011). Pornography and sex crimes in the Czech Republic. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1037–1043. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9696-y
20.
DiamondS. (1985). Pornography: Image and reality. In BurstynV.Women against censorship (pp. 40–57). Vancouver, Canada: Douglas & McIntyre.
21.
DonaldR. (1992). Mean, moody, and magnificent: The hero in romance literature. In KrentzJ., Dangerous men and adventurous women: Writers on the appeal of the romance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
DworkinA. (1989). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York, NY: Penguin.
23.
EllisB. J., & SymonsD. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–555. doi: 10.1080/00224499009551579
24.
EtcoffN. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York, NY: Doubleday.
FisherM., & CoxA. (2010). Man change thyself: Hero versus heroine development in Harlequin romance novels. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4, 305–316.
27.
FismanR., IyengarS. S., KamenicaE., & SimonsonI. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673–697. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.673
GangestadS. W., & ThornhillR. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In SimpsonJ. A. & KenrickD. T., Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
GangestadS. W., & ThornhillR. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927–933. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0380
GorryA. (1999). Leaving home for romance: Tourist women's adventures abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California at Santa Barbara.
33.
GrammerK., FinkB., ThornhillR., JuetteA., & RunzalG. (2002). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In RhodesG. & ZebrowitzL. A., Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive and social perspectives (pp. 91–126). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
34.
HaldG. M., & MalamuthN. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography in representative sample of the Danish population. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 614–625. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1
HawleyP. H., & HensleyW. A. (2009). Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: Feminine pathology or power?Journal of Sex Research, 46, 568–585. doi: 10.1080/00224490902878985
37.
HazeJ.. (2011). Breast in Class: Naturally Gifted [Motion Picture]. USA: Jules Jordan Video.
38.
HazenH. (1983). Endless rapture: Rape, romance and the female imagination. New York, NY: Scribner's.
HinszV. B., MatzD. C., & PatienceR. A. (2001). Does women's hair signal reproductive potential?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 166–172. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1450
41.
HughesS. M., & GallupG. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6
42.
KenrickD. T., SadallaE. K., GrothG., & TrostM. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x
43.
KrugerD., FisherM., & JoblingI. (2003). Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads: Alternative mating strategies in British Romantic literature. Human Nature, 14, 305–317.
44.
KutchinskyB. (1991). Pornography and rape: Theory and practice? Evidence from crime data in four countries where pornography is easily available. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 47–64.
45.
La CerraM. M. (1994). Evolved mate preferences in women: Psychological adaptations for assessing a man's willingness to invest in offspring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
46.
LiN. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: People prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 528–535.
47.
MacKinnonC. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
MalamuthN., & HuppinM. (2005). Pornography and teenagers: The importance of individual differences. Adolescent Medicine, 16, 315–326.
49.
ManningJ. T., ScuttD., WhitehouseG. H., & LeinsterS. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/S0162-3095(97)00002-0
50.
MarcusS. (1985). The other Victorians: A study of sexuality and pornography in mid-nineteenth century England. New York: WW Norton and Co.
51.
MarloweF. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15, 365–376. doi: 10.1007/s12110-004-1014-8
52.
MarshallW. D. (1989). Pornography and sex offenders. In ZillmanD. & BryantJ., Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 185–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
McElroyA. (1995). XXX: A woman's right to pornography. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
54.
ModleskiT. (1980). The disappearing act: A study of Harlequin romances. Signs, 5, 435–448. doi: 10.1086/493729
55.
Monk-TurnerE., & PurcellH. C. (1999). Sexual violence in pornography: How prevalent is it?Gender Issues, 17, 58–67. doi: 10.1007/s12147-999-0015-7
56.
MussellK. (1984). Fantasy and reconciliation: Contemporary formulas of women's romance fiction. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
57.
NorrisM., & PawlowskiW. (2010). Business of consumer book publishing. Stamford, CT: Simba Information.
58.
OgasO., & GaddamS. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the world's largest experiment reveals about human desire. New York, NY: Dutton.
59.
OkamiP., & ShackelfordT. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 186–241.
60.
PagliaC. (1994). Vamps and tramps: New essays. New York, NY: Vintage.
61.
PlatekS. M., & SinghD. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women active neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE, 5, 1–5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009042
62.
PoundN. (2002). Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 443–466. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00103-4
63.
PoundN., & GageM. J. G. (2004). Prudent sperm allocation in Rattus Norvegicus: A mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Animal Behaviour, 68, 819–823. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.004
64.
RadwayJ. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
65.
RenaudS. (2010). Big Tits in Uniform[Motion Picture}. USA: Brazzers.
66.
RhodesG. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
67.
RoneyJ. R., HansonK. N., DuranteK. M., & MaestripieriD. (2006). Reading men's faces: Women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 273, 2169–2175. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3569
SalmonC. (2004). The pornography debate: What sex differences in erotica can tell us about human sexuality. In CrawfordC. & SalmonC., Evolutionary psychology, public policy and personal decisions (pp. 217–230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
SalmonC., & DiamondA. (in press). Evolutionary perspectives on the content analysis of heterosexual and homosexual pornography. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology.
SchmaltH. D. (2006). Waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness: The moderating role of power motivation and the mating context. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 455–465. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.008
73.
SinghD. (1993). Adaptive significance of waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
74.
SinghD., & YoungR. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7
75.
StaglianoJ., & StaglianoJ.. (1990). Buttman Goes to Rio [Motion Picture]. USA: Evil Angel Video.
SugiyamaL. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In BussD. M., The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292–342). New York, NY: Wiley.
79.
SymonsD. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
80.
SymonsD. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In AbramsonP. R. & PinkertonS. D., Sexual nature: Sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
81.
ThornhillR., & GangestadS. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001
82.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB., Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
83.
VoracekM., & FisherM. L. (2006). Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 297–304. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9021-y
84.
WendellS., & TanC. (2009). Beyond heaving bosoms: The smart bitches' guide to romance novels. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
