Most investigations of creativity tend to take one of two directions: everyday creativity (also called “little-c”), which can be found in nearly all people, and eminent creativity (also called “Big-C”), which is reserved for the great. In this paper, the authors propose a Four C model of creativity that expands this dichotomy. Specifically, the authors add the idea of “mini-c,” creativity inherent in the learning process, and Pro-c, the developmental and effortful progression beyond little-c that represents professional-level expertise in any creative area. The authors include different transitions and gradations of these four dimensions of creativity, and then discuss advantages and examples of the Four C Model.
AgarsM. D., BaerJ., & KaufmanJ. C. (2005). The many creativities of business and the APT Model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15, 133–142.
2.
AgarsM. D., KaufmanJ. C., & LockeT. R. (2008). Social influence and creativity in organizations: A multilevel lens for theory, research, and practice. In MumfordM., HunterS. T., & Bedell-AversK. E., Multi-level issues in organizational innovation (Multi-level issues series) (pp. 3–62). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
3.
AmabileT. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
4.
AmabileT. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.”Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6.
AmabileT. M., & GitomerJ. (1984). Children's artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 209–215.
7.
AmabileT. M., HennesseyB. A., & GrossmanB. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.
8.
AmabileT. M., HillK. G., HennesseyB. A., & TigheE. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.
9.
AndreasenN. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.
10.
BaerJ. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23–39.
11.
BaerJ. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multi-domain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35–46.
12.
BaerJ., & KaufmanJ. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
13.
BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & GentileC. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113–117.
14.
BakkerH., BoersmaK., OreelS. (2006). Creativity (ideas) management in industrial R & D organizations: A Crea-Political Process Model and an empirical illustration of Corus RD & T. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 296–309.
15.
BeghettoR. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity?The Educational Forum, 69, 254–263.
16.
BeghettoR. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.
17.
BeghettoR. A. (2007a). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.
18.
BeghettoR. A. (2007b). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 1–9.
19.
BeghettoR. A., & KaufmanJ. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.
20.
BeghettoR. A., & PluckerJ. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can't get there from here?” In KaufmanJ. C. & BearJ.Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development (pp. 316–332). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
BloomB. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
22.
BranchT. (1988). Parting the waters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
23.
CohenL. M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.
24.
CropleyA. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25.
CropleyA. J. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28, 125–130.
26.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In SternbergR. J.Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
DawsonV. L. (1997). In search of the Wild Bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19, 148–152.
28.
DittmerJ. (1994). Local people: The struggle for civil rights in Mississippi. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
29.
EisenbergerR., & ShanockL. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.
30.
EnrightM. K., & GitomerD. H. (1989). Toward a Description of Successful Graduate Students (GRE Board Professional Rep. No. 89-09, GRE Board Research Rep. 85-17R). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
31.
EricssonK. A. (1996). The road to expert performance: empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
EricssonK. A., RoringR. W., & NandagopalK. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Abilities Studies, 18, 3–56.
33.
FloridaR. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
34.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
35.
GibsonW. (1960). The miracle worker. New York: Samuel French.
36.
GruberH. (1981). Darwin on man (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
GuilfordJ. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
38.
HallW., & MacKinnonD. W. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326.
39.
HanK. S. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142.
40.
HarringtonD., BlockJ. H., & BlockJ. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers’ theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 851–856.
41.
HayesJ. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
HermannD. (1999). Helen Keller: A life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
KaufmanJ. C. (2001). Genius, lunatics, and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 20, 305–314.
44.
KaufmanJ. C., & BaerJ. (2004). The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 15–25.
45.
KaufmanJ. C., & BaerJ. (2006). Intelligence testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99–102.
46.
KaufmanJ. C., BaerJ., ColeJ. C., & SextonJ. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171–178.
47.
KaufmanJ. C. & BeghettoR. A. (in press). Exploring mini-c across cultures. To appear in DeHaanR. & NarayanK. M. V., Education for innovation: Implications for India, China and America. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
48.
KaufmanJ. C., GentileC. A., & BaerJ. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way?Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260–265.
49.
KaufmanS. B., & KaufmanJ. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.
50.
KaufmanJ. C., LeeJ., BaerJ., & LeeS. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96–106.
51.
KaufmanJ. C., PluckerJ. A., & BaerJ. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley.
52.
KaufmanJ. C., & SternbergR. J. (2006). The international handbook of creativity. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
KaufmanS. B., & SternbergR. J. (2007). Giftedness in the Euro-American culture. In PhillipsonS. N. & McCannM., Conceptions of giftedness: Socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 377–413). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
KellerH. (1905). The story of my life. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
56.
KingR. (2006). The judgment of Paris. New York: Walker & Company.
57.
KozbeltA. (2007). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 35, 147–172.
LudwigA. M. (1995). The price of greatness. New York: Guilford Press.
60.
MartindaleC. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.
61.
MoranS., & John-SteinerV. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky's contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In SawyerR. K., John-SteinerV., MoranS., SternbergR. J., FeldmanD. H., NakamuraJ., & CsikszentmihalyiM.Creativity and development. (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
NemethC. J., & GoncaloJ. A. (2005). Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 1–8.
63.
NettleD. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876–890.
64.
NielsenK. E. (2004). The radical lives of Helen Keller. New York: NYU Press.
65.
NiuW. & SternbergR. J. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.
66.
NiuW., & SternbergR. J. (2006). The philosophical roots of western and eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 18–38.
67.
PluckerJ., BeghettoR. A., & DowG. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
68.
RichardsR. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: “Afterview” for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.
69.
RichardsR. (1993a). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: “Afterview” for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.
RichardsR. (1999). Affective disorders. In RuncoM. A. & PritzkerS., Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 31–43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72.
RichardsR. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In RichardsR., Everyday creativity and new views of human nature (pp. 25–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73.
RichardsR., KinneyD. K., BenetM., & MerzelA. P. C. (1988). Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the Lifetime Creativity Scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476–485.
74.
RothenbergA. (1995). Creativity and mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 815–816.
75.
RudowiczE., & YueX. (2000). Concepts of creativity: similarities and differences among Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175–192.
76.
RuncoM. A. (1989). The creativity of children's art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177–190.
77.
RuncoM. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.
78.
RuncoM. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In SternbergR. J., GrigorenkoE. L., & SingerJ. L., Creativity: From potential to realization. (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
79.
RuncoM. A., & RichardsR. (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
80.
SawyerR. K., John-SteinerV., MoranS., SternbergR., FeldmanD. H., CsikszentmihalyiM., NakamuraJ. (2003). Creativity and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
SchlesingerJ. (2003). Issues in creativity and madness, part three: Who cares?Ethical Human Sciences & Services, 5, 149–152.
82.
ScottC. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–337.
83.
SieglerR. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In GranottN. & ParzialeJ., Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SieglerR. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In DamonW. & LernerR. M. & KuhnD. & SieglerR. S., Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
85.
SimontonD. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.
86.
SimontonD. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.
87.
SimontonD. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.
88.
SimontonD. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.
89.
SimontonD. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
90.
SimontonD. K. (1998). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 198–210.
91.
SimontonD. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.
92.
SimontonD. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
93.
SmithJ. K. (in press). Trouble in River City. A review of The Last Word: The Best Commentary and Controversy in American Education (Eds. of Education Week, Eds.). PsycCRITIQUES.
94.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95.
SternbergR. J., GrigorenkoE. L., & SingerJ. L. (2004). Creativity: From Potential to Realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
96.
SternbergR. J., KaufmanJ. C., & GrigorenkoE. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
97.
SternbergR. J., KaufmanJ. C., & PretzJ. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
98.
SternbergR. J., & LubartT. I. (1996). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.
99.
TorranceE. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personal Press.
100.
TorranceE. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
101.
VygotskyL. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. (M. E. Sharpe, Inc.,). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97. (Original work published 1967).
102.
WestbyE. L., & DawsonV. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.
