H. D. Saltzstein and T. Kasachkoff (2004) critique the social intuitionist model (J. Haidt, 2001), but the model they critique is a stripped-down version that should be called the “possum” model. They make 3 charges about the possum model that are not true about the social intuitionist model: that it includes no role for reasoning, that it reduces social influence to compliance, and that it does not take a developmental perspective. After a defense of the honor of the social intuitionist model, this article raises 2 areas of legitimate dispute: the scope and nature of moral reasoning and the usefulness of appealing to innate ideas, rather than to learning and reasoning, as the origin of moral knowledge. This article presents 3 clusters of innate moral intuitions, related to sympathy, hierarchy, and reciprocity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(Whole No. 416).
2.
BarghJ. A., & ChartrandT. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
3.
BergerP. L., & LuckmanT. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
4.
BoehmC. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
ChaikenS. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In ZannaM. P., OlsonJ. M., & HermanC. P., Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
De WaalF. (1982). Chimpanzee politics. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
De WaalF. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
FiskeA. P. (1991). Structures of social life. New York: Free Press.
9.
GigerenzerG. (2002). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
11.
HaidtJ., & HershM. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and reasons of liberals and conservatives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 191–221.
12.
HaidtJ., & JosephC. (in press). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus.
13.
HaidtJ., KollerS., & DiasM. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.
14.
HaidtJ., RozinP., McCauleyC. R., & ImadaS. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107–131.
15.
HarrisJ. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.
16.
HaslamN. (1997). Four grammars for primate social relations. In SimpsonJ. A. & KenrickD. T., Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 297–316). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
JamesW. (1961). The varieties of religious experienceNew York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1902)
18.
KuhnD. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19.
MillerW. R., & C'de BacaJ. (2001). Quantum change. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
MinouraY. (1992). A sensitive period for the incorporation of a cultural meaning system: A study of Japanese children growing up in the United States. Ethos, 20, 304–339.
21.
NewcombT. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. New York: Dryden.
22.
NisbettR. E., & CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
PerkinsD. N., FaradyM., & BusheyB. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In VossJ. F., PerkinsD. N., & SegalJ. W., Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
PettyR. E., & CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.
25.
RozinP., HaidtJ., & McCauleyC. R. (2000). Disgust. In LewisM. & Haviland-JonesJ. M., Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 637–653). New York: Guilford Press.
26.
SaltzsteinH. D., & KasachkoffT. (2004). Haidt's moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical critique. Review of General Psychology, 8, 273–282.
27.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.
28.
SherifM. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27(Whole No. 187).
29.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.
30.
WhitingJ., & ChildI. (1953). Child training and personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
