Theories of creativity have not traditionally considered whether novel ideas or inventive behaviors can result from regularities in the cognitive processes responsible for such activities. Most of these traditional theories are based on the evaluation of products as meeting (or not) some abstract metric of creative output. However, cognitive theories of creativity can be proposed in which creative activity is a function of more traditional cognitive processes that are not unique to inventive behaviors. The purpose of this article is to review the cognitive regularities of creative activity and organize the research on this topic into a framework that might be useful in understanding and extending investigations directed at studying creativity. To these ends, cognitive processes underlying generation, synthesis, and selection of information in creative activities are delineated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2.
AndersonJ. R., & BowerG. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123.
3.
AndersonJ. R., & BowerG. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
4.
AndersonR. C., & PichertJ. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12.
5.
BeggI., MaxwellD., MittererJ. O., & HarrisG. (1986). Estimates of frequency: Attribute of attribution?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 496–508.
6.
BodenM. A. (1991). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.
7.
BodenM. A. (1994). What is creativity?. In BodenM. A., Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BornsteinB. H., & LeCompteD. C. (1995). A comparison of forgetting of source and item recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 254–259.
9.
BowerG. H. (1996). Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 27–72.
10.
BransfordJ. D., & JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
11.
BransfordJ. D., & JohnsonM. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In ChaseW. G., Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York: Academic Press.
12.
BredartS., WardT. B., & MarczewskiP. (1998). Structured imagination of novel creatures’ faces. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 607–625.
13.
BrownA. S., & HallidayH. E. (1991). Cryptomnesia and source memory difficulties. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 475–490.
14.
DodsonC. S., & JohnsonM. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181–194.
15.
EysenckH. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: A theoretical perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.
16.
FinkeR. A., WardT. B., & SmithS. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
GagneC., & ShobenE. J. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of nonpredicating combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71–87.
18.
GickM. L., & HolyoakK. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
19.
GickM. L., & HolyoakK. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
20.
GruberH. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.
21.
HamptonJ. A. (1997). Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In WardT. B., SmithS. M., & VaidJ., Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
HausmanC. R. (1984). A discourse on novelty and creation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
HintzmanD. L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple trace model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.
24.
JacobyL. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
25.
JacobyL. L., LevyB. A., & SteinbachK. (1992). Episodic transfer and automaticity: Integration of data-driven and conceptually-driven processing in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 15–24.
JohnsonM. K., HashtroudiS., & LindsayD. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
28.
KolersP. A., & RoedigerH. L.III. (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449.
29.
KosslynS. M. (1987). Seeing and imaging in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.
30.
LandauJ. D., & MarshR. L. (1997). Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 265–270.
31.
LindsayD. S., & JohnsonM. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203–205.
32.
MandlerG. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.
33.
MarshR. L., BinkM. L., & HicksJ. L. (1999). Conceptual priming in a generative problem solving task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 355–363.
34.
MarshR. L., LandauJ. D., & HicksJ. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 669–680.
35.
MarshR. L., LandauJ. D., & HicksJ. L. (1997). Contribution of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 886–897.
36.
MarshR. L., WardT. B., & LandauJ. D. (1998). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 94–105.
37.
MednickS. A. (1962). The association basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
38.
MurphyG. L., & AllopennaP. D. (1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 904–919.
39.
NelsonT. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.
NormanD. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
42.
PerfettoG. A., BransfordJ. D., & FranksJ. J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem solving context. Memory & Cognition, 11, 24–31.
43.
PerkinsD. N. (1988). Creativity and the quest for a mechanism. In SternbergR. J. & SmithE. E., The psychology of human thought (pp. 310–336). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
RatcliffR. A., & McKoonG. (1981). Does activation really spread?Psychological Review, 88, 454–462.
45.
ReedG. (1974). The psychology of anomalous experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
RoedigerH. L.III, & ChallisB. H. (1992). Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 3–14.
47.
RoedigerH. L.III, WeldonM. S., & ChallisB. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In RoedigerH. L.III & CraikF. I. M., Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
RoschE. (1978). Principles of categorization. In RoschE. & LloydB., Cognition and categorization (pp. 28–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
RossB. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629–639.
50.
RossB. H., RyanW. J., & TenpennyP. L. (1989). The access of relevant information for solving problems. Memory & Cognition, 17, 639–651.
51.
RuncoM. A., & ChandI. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267.
52.
SchacterD. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.
53.
SchacterD. L., HarblukJ. L., & McLachlanD. R. (1984). Retrieval without recollection: An experimental analysis of source amnesia. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 593–611.
54.
ShobenE. J., & GagneC. (1997). Thematic relations and the creation of combined concepts. In WardT. B., SmithS. M., & VaidJ., Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 31–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
SmithS. M., WardT. B., & SchumacherJ. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in creative tasks. Memory & Cognition, 21, 837–845.
56.
SpaldingT. L., & MurphyG. L. (1999). What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 856–867.
57.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.
58.
SternbergR. J., & LubartT. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 24, 1–32.
59.
SternbergR. J., & LubartT. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 1–5.
60.
SternbergR. J., & LubartT. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
61.
SternbergR. J., & LubartT. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688.
62.
TaylorF. K. (1965). Cryptomnesia and plagiarism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 1111–1118.
63.
TenpennyP. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 339–363.
64.
TenpennyP. L., KeriazakosM. S., LewG. S., & PhelanT. P. (1998). In search of inadvertent plagiarism. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 529–559.
65.
ThompsonA. L., & KlatzkyR. L. (1978). Studies of visual synthesis: Integration of fragments into forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 244–263.
66.
TorranceE. P. (1974). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
67.
TorranceE. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its test. In SternbergR. J., The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TulvingE. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of unrelated words. Psychological Review, 69, 344–354.
69.
TverskyB., & HemenwayK. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
70.
WardT. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.
71.
WardT. B. (1995). What's old about new ideas?. In SmithS., WardT., & FinkeR., The creative cognition approach (pp. 157–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
WardT. B., & SifonisC. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same?Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 18–32.
73.
WeisbergR. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
74.
WeisbergR. W., DiCamilloM., & PhillipsD. (1978). Transferring old associations to new problems: A nonautomatic process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 219–228.
75.
WisniewskiE. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 167–183.
76.
ZechmeisterE. B., & NybergS. E. (1982). Human memory: An introduction to research and theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
