This article describes the differing socialities of 2 of the cultural groups of East Asia, the Chinese and the Japanese, both of which have been characterized as “collectivistic” or “interdependent” in a great deal of research, and questions the wisdom of such categorizations. Rooted in the familial environment and kinship relationships supported by the ideology of Confucianism, the Chinese have developed a particular form of authority-directed orientation while retaining a strong sense of individuality. The Japanese, on the other hand, have developed a different pattern of peer-group orientation by virtue of their different social and historical circumstances. These culture-specific patterns are nurtured by child-rearing and educational practices and sustained by other institutional settings. Future research needs to be directed toward uncovering such qualitative differences among cultural groups of the East as well as those of the West.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoT. W., Frenkel-BrunswikE., LevinsonD. J., & SanfordR. N. (1969). The authoritarian personality. New York: Norton.
2.
AllikJ., & RealoA. (1996). The hierarchical nature of individualism-collectivism: Comments on Matsumoto et al. Culture and Psychology, 2, 109–117.
3.
BefuH. (1971). Japan: An anthropological introduction. San Francisco: Chandler.
4.
BrancoA. U. (1996). Constraints on the universality of psychological constructs. Culture and Psychology, 2, 477–483.
5.
ChanA. (1985). Children of Mao: Personality development and political activism in the Red Guard generation. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
6.
CohenM. L. (1976). House united, house divided: The Chinese family in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
DienD. S. (1992). Gender and individuation: China and the West. Psychoanalytic Review, 7, 105–119.
8.
DoiT. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. (BesterJ.,). Tokyo: Kodansha International.
9.
DoiT. (1985). The anatomy of self: The individual versus society. (HarbisonM. A.,). Tokyo: Kodansha International.
10.
EarleyP. C., & GibsonC. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304.
11.
FiskeA. P., KitayamaS., MarkusH. R., & NisbettR. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In GilbertD. T., FiskeS. T., & LindzeyG., The handbook of social psychology (pp. 915–981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
FreedmanM. (1958). Lineage organization in Southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.
13.
FrommE. (1942). The fear of freedom. London: Kegan Paul.
14.
GladneyD. C. (1996). Muslim Chinese: Ethnic nationalities in the People's Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HendryJ. (1986). Becoming Japanese: The world of the pre-school child. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
16.
HoD. Y., & ChiuC.-Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In KimU., TriandisH. C., KagitcibasiC., ChoiS.-C., & YoonG., Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 200–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
HsüI. C. Y. (1990). The rise of modern China. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
HuangA. (1997). Fate or the state?Free China Review, 47, 16–29.
19.
IshidaT. (1971). Japanese society. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
20.
KamataS. (1982). Japan in the passing lane. New York: Pantheon Books.
21.
KingA. Y. C. (1985). The individual and group in Confucianism: A relational perspective. In MunroD. J., Individualism and holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist values (pp. 57–70). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
LeeB. J. (1981). Female infanticide in China. In GuissoR. W. & StanleyS., Women in China: Current directions in historical scholarship (pp. 163–177). Youngstown, NY: Philo Press.
23.
LewW. J. F. (1998). Understanding the Chinese personality: Parenting, schooling, values, morality, relations, and personality. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
24.
LewisC. C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
MarkusH. R., & KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
26.
MartinP. (1997). The chrysanthemum throne: A history of the emperors of Japan. Phoenix Mill, England: Sutton.
27.
MatsumotoD., KudohT., & TakeuchiS. (1996). Changing patterns of individualism and collectivism in the United States and Japan. Culture and Psychology, 2, 77–107.
28.
MillerJ. G. (1999). Cultural psychology: Implications for basic psychological theory. Psychological Science, 10, 85–91.
29.
MillerJ. G.The cultural grounding of social psychological theory. In TesserA. & SchwartzN., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Interpersonal processesOxford, England: Blackwell. (in press).
30.
NakaneC. (1973). Japanese society. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
31.
OerterR., OerterR., AgostianiH., KimH., & WibowoS. (1996). The concept of human nature in East Asia: Etic and emic characteristics. Culture and Psychology, 2, 9–51.
32.
OkimotoD. I., & RohlenT. P. (1988). Inside the Japanese system: Readings on contemporary society and political economy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
OuchiW. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Avon.
34.
OzakiR. S. (1978). The Japanese: A cultural portrait. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle.
35.
Pa Chin. (1972). Family. New York: Doubleday.
36.
PascaleR. T., & AthosA. G. (1981). The art of Japanese management: Applications for American executives. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
PyeL. W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
38.
RatnerC. (1997). Cultural psychology and qualitative methodology: Theoretical and empirical considerations. New York: Plenum.
39.
ReischauerE. O. (1981). Japan: The story of a Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
40.
ReischauerE. O. (1988). The Japanese today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
RohlenT. P. (1989). Order in Japanese society: Attachment, authority and routine. Journal of Japanese Studies, 15, 5–40.
42.
RohlenT. P., & LeTendreG. K. (1996). Teaching and learning in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RolandA. (1988). In search of self in India and Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
RosenthalE. (1999, June6). Former insider still hopes leaders will rethink the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown. The New York Times, p. 6.
45.
SansomG. (1963). A history of Japan: 1615–1867. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
SchwartzS. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.
47.
SingelisT. M., TriandisH. C., BhawukD. S., & GelfandM. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.
48.
SloteW. H. (1998). Psychocultural dynamics within the Confucian family. In SloteW. H. & De VosG. A., The Confucianism and the family (pp. 37–51). Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
SmithP. B., DuganS., PetersonM. F., & LeungK. (1998). Individualism-collectivism and the handling of disagreement: A 23-country study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 351–367.
50.
SmithR. J. (1983). Japanese society: Tradition, self, and the social order. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51.
StevensonH., AzumaH., HakutaK., (1986). Child development in Japan. New York: Freeman.
52.
TobinJ. J., WuD. Y. H., & DavidsonD. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
TriandisH. C. (1989). The self and the social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
54.
TriandisH. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In BermanJ., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
55.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco: Westview.
56.
TriandisH. C., BontempoR., VillarealM. J., AsaiM., & LuccaN. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
57.
TriandisH. C., & SingelisT. M. (1998). Training to recognize individual differences in collectivism and individualism within culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 35–47.
58.
WhiteM. I. (1987). The Japanese educational challenge: A commitment to children. New York: Free Press.
59.
WolfM. (1968). The house of Lim. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
60.
WolfM. (1972). Women and the family in rural Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
WolfM. (1994). Beyond the patrilineal self: Constructing gender in China. In AmesR. T., DissanayakeW., & KasulisT. P., Self as person in Asian theory and practice (pp. 251–267). Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
YamagishiT. (1988). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530–542.
63.
YamagishiT., & YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.
64.
YamamuraY. (1986). The child in Japanese society. In StevensonH., AzumaH., & HakutaK., Child development and education in Japan (pp. 28–38). New York: Freeman.
