This article presents a framework for understanding aesthetic experience, with special reference to the natural environment. The framework entails 2 broad perspectives. First, from a functional perspective, aesthetic experiences are analyzed in terms of biological, sociocultural, and psychological systems of behavior; succinctly stated, objects are experienced aesthetically if they activate cognitive representations of response patterns that do or did contribute to the survival or enhancement of the species, society, or the self. Second, from the perspective of mediating mechanisms, the cognitive processes that enable aesthetic experiences are examined. The mechanisms discussed range from simple sensory processes to the activation and transformation of complex schemas. To the extent that cognitive representations of behavioral systems are flexible and subject to elaboration and refinement, aesthetic experience is a creative, skillful act.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanI., & ChemersM. M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
AppletonJ. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
3.
AppletonJ. (1988). Prospect and refuge revisited. In NasarJ. L., Environmental aesthetics (pp. 27–44). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AppletonJ. (1990). The symbolism of habitat: An interpretation of landscape in the arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
5.
ArnheimR. (1986). New essays on the psychology of art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
AverillJ. R. (1979). The functions of grief. In IzardC., Emotions in personality and psychopathology (pp. 339–368). New York: Plenum.
7.
AverillJ. R. (1990). Emotions as related to systems of behavior. In SteinN. L., LeventhalB., & TrabassoT., Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 385–404). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
AverillJ. R., & MoreT. A. (1993). Happiness. In LewisM. & HavilandJ. M., Handbook of emotions (pp. 617–629). New York: Guilford Press.
9.
BaconW. (1996). Multisensory landscape aesthetics. In DriverB. L., DustinD., BalticT., ElsnerG., & PetersonG., Nature and the human spirit: Toward an expanded land management ethic (pp. 311–320). State College, PA: Venture.
10.
BallingJ. D., & FalkJ. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5–28.
11.
BellC. (1913). Art. London: Stokes.
12.
BerleantA. (1993). The aesthetics of art and nature. In KemalS. & GaskellI., Landscape, natural beauty, and the arts (pp. 228–243). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
14.
BerlyneD. E.. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
15.
BoselieF. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65–73.
16.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss. Volume 1. Attachment (2nd ed). New York: Basic Books.
17.
CarlsonA. A. (1977). On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty. Landscape Planning, 4, 131–172.
18.
CarlsonA. A. (1984). On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty—a response to Ribe. Landscape Planning, 11, 49–65.
19.
ChenowethR. E., & GobsterP. H. (1990). The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape. Landscape Journal, 9, 1–8.
20.
CollierG. L. (1996). Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 1–32.
21.
CosgroveD. (1984). Social formation and symbolic landscape. London: Croon Helm.
22.
CostonisJ. J. (1989). Icons and aliens: Law, aesthetics, and environmental change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
CrozierW. R., & GreenhalghP. (1992). The empathy principle: Towards a model for the psychology of art. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 22, 63–79.
24.
CunninghamM. R., BarbeeA. P., & PikeC. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.
25.
CupchikG. C. (1992). From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In CupchikG. C. & LászlóJ., Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp. 83–99). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
CupchikG. C., & GebotysR. J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretive styles and judgments of quality. Visual Arts Research, 14, 38–50.
27.
DarwinC. (1874). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (2nd ed.). London: John Murray.
28.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In DienstbierR., Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
DennettD. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
30.
DeweyJ. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.
31.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch.
32.
DiamondJ. (1993). New Guineans and their natural world. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O., The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 251–270). Washington, DC: Island.
33.
DickieG. (1964). The myth of the aesthetic attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1, 55–65.
34.
DiffeyT. J. (1986). The idea of aesthetic experience. In MitiasM. H., Possibility of the aesthetic experience (pp. 3–12). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
35.
DissanayakeE. (1992). Homo aestheticus. New York: Free Press.
36.
DobzhanskyT. (1962). Mankind evolving. New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.
37.
DucasseC. J. (1966). The philosophy of artNew York: Dover. (Original work published 1929)
38.
DuncanJ. S.Jr. (1976). Landscape and the communication of social identity. In RapoportA., The mutual interaction of people and their built environment: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 391–401). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
39.
EdmanI.. (1961). The philosophy of Plato. New York: Pantheon Books.
40.
EmmonsR. A., & KaiserH. A. (1995). Goal orientation and emotional well-being: Linking goals and affect through the self. In TesserA. & MartinL., Goals and affectNew York: Plenum.
41.
EverndenN. (1992). The social creation of nature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
FechnerG. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik. [Primer of aesthetics]. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf und Härtel.
43.
FreudS. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (StrachyJ.,). In Standard edition (Vol. 7). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1905)
44.
FrijdaN. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
46.
GlackenC. H. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian shore: Nature and culture in Western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
HeerwagenJ. H., & OriansG. H. (1993). Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O., The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 138–172). Washington, DC: Island Press.
49.
HoneymanM. K. (1992). Vegetation and stress: A comparison study of varying amounts of vegetation in countryside and urban scenes. In RelfD., The role of horticulture in human well-being and social developmentPortland, OR: Timber Press.
50.
HuxleyA. (1945). The perennial philosophy. New York: Harper.
51.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Holt.
52.
JungC. G. (1969). The structure and dynamic of the psyche (HullR. F. C.,). In Collected works (Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1936)
53.
KantI. (1952). The critique of judgment (MeredethJ. C.,). Oxford: Clarendon. (Original work published 1790)
54.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55.
KaplanS. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3–32.
56.
KaplanS. (1988). Perception and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. In NasarJ. L., Environmental aesthetics (pp. 45–55). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
KellertS. R. (1983). Affective, cognitive, and evaluative perceptions of animals. In AltmanI. & WohlwillJ. F., Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 241–267). New York: Plenum Press.
58.
KellertS. R., & WilsonE. O.. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
59.
KellyG. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
60.
KirkpatrickL. A. (in press). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In CassidyJ. & ShaverP. R., Handbook of attachment theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.
61.
KreitlerH., & KreitlerS. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
LangloisJ. H., & RoggmanL. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121.
63.
LangloisJ. H., RoggmanL. A., & MusselmanL. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces. Psychological Science, 5, 214–220.
64.
LippsT. (1897). Raumästhetik und geometrische-optische Täuschungen. [Aesthetics of space and geometric-optical illusions]. Leipzig, Germany: Barth.
65.
LippsT. (1990). Ästhetische Einfühlung [Aesthetic empathy]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 22, 415–450.
66.
LoewensteinG. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
67.
LorenzK. (1971). Part and parcel in animal and human societies (R. Martin, Trans.). In LorenzK., Studies in animal and human behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 115–195). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
LowS. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: Place attachment in the plaza. In AltmanI. & LowS., Place attachment (pp. 165–185). New York: Plenum.
69.
LubartT. I., & GetzI. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 285–301.
70.
LuhmannN. (1982). The differentiation of society. (HolmesS.,). New York: Columbia University Press.
MaquetJ. (1986). The aesthetic experience: An anthropologist looks at the visual arts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
73.
MartindaleC. (1988). Aesthetics, psychobiology, and cognition. In FarleyF. H. & NeperudR. W., The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 7–42). New York: Praeger.
74.
MartindaleC., & MooreK. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptions and Performance, 14, 661–670.
75.
MartindaleC., MooreK., & BorkumJ. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53–80.
76.
MaslowA. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
77.
NasarJ. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26, 377–401.
78.
NasarJ. L., & JonesK. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29, 291–323.
79.
NasarJ. L., JulianD., BuchmanS., HumphreysD., & MrohalyM. (1988). The aesthetic quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge. In NasarJ. L., Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 357–363). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
80.
NietzscheF. (1969). On the geneology of morals (KaufmannW. & HollingdaleR. D.,). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1887)
81.
OriansG. H. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In LockardJ. S., The evolution of human social behavior (pp. 49–66). New York: Elsevier.
82.
OriansG. H. (1986). An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In Penning-RowsellE. C. & LowenthalD., Landscape meaning and values (pp. 3–25). London: Allen & Unwin.
83.
OriansG. H., & HeerwagenJ. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In BarkowJ., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ., The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
84.
OsborneH. (1986). What makes an experience aesthetic?. In MitiasM. H., Possibility of the aesthetic experience (pp. 117–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
85.
ParducciA. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86.
PurcellA. T. (1986). Environmental perception and affect: A schema discrepancy model. Environment and Behavior, 18, 3–30.
87.
RapoportA. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
88.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
RibeR. G. (1982). On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty—a response. Landscape Planning, 9, 61–75.
90.
RobertsE. (1996). Place and spirit in public land management. In DriverB. L., DustinD., BalticT., ElsnerG., & PetersonG., Nature and the human spirit: Toward an expanded land management ethic (pp. 61–80). State College, PA: Venture.
91.
RogersC. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
92.
RossmanB. B., & UlehlaZ. J. (1977). Psychological reward values associated with wilderness use: A functional-reinforcement approach. Environment and Behavior, 9, 41–66.
93.
SantayanaG. (1955). The sense of beautyNew York: Random House. (Original work published 1896)
94.
SchopenhauerA. (1964). The world as will and idea (HaldaneR. B. & KempJ.,). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1883)
95.
SchroederH. W. (1996). Ecology of the heart: Understanding how people experience natural environments. In EwertA. W., Natural resource management: The human dimension (pp. 13–27). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
96.
ScottN. R. (1974). Toward a psychology of wilderness experience. Natural Resources Journal, 14, 231–237.
97.
SepänmaY. (1986). The beauty of the environment: A general model for environmental aesthetics. Helsinki, Finland: Suomaliainen Tiedeakatemia.
98.
ShahnB. (1964). The biography of a painting. In TomasV., Creativity in the arts (pp. 13–34). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
99.
ShaverP., HazanC., & BradshawD. (1988). Love as attachment. In SternbergR. J. & BarnesM. L., The psychology of love (pp. 68–99). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
100.
SpectorJ. J. (1973). The aesthetics of Freud: A study in psychoanalysis and art. New York: Praeger.
TuanY.-F. (1993). Desert and ice: Ambivalent aesthetics. In KemalS. & GaskellI., Landscape, natural beauty and the arts (pp. 139–157). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
103.
UlrichR. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 17–23.
104.
UlrichR. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556.
105.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.
106.
UlrichR. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29–44.
107.
UlrichR. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O., The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington, DC: Island Press.
108.
UrmsonJ. O. (1957). What makes a situation aesthetic?. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. 31. (pp. 75–92). London: Harrison.
109.
von UexküllJ., & KriszatG. (1957). A stroll through the world of animals and men. In SchillerC. H., Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1934)
110.
WeisbergR. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: Freeman.
111.
WhitfieldT. W. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 221–237.
112.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
113.
WohlwillJ. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics: The environment as a source of affect. In AltmanI. & WohlwillJ. R., Human behavior and the environment: Advances in theory and research: (Vol. 1, pp. 37–86). New York: Plenum.
114.
WolffJ. (1993). Aesthetics and the sociology of art (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
