The analogy between biology and engineering in evolutionary psychology is argued to be insightful but limited. A broader analogy is therefore proposed called “biology as technology.” Biological evolution, that is, is best understood as the design and production of technical systems rather than engineered mechanisms. On that basis, a social constructionist theory of technology is used to found a revised analogy. This theory distinguishes primary instrumentalization processes of functionalization from secondary instrumentalization processes that realize technical systems in surrounding contexts. Using this framework, the revised analogy bridges between adaptationist accounts in standard evolutionary psychology and interactionist accounts critical of standard evolutionary psychology. Implications of this revised analogy for the evolution of mindedness and sociality are identified and discussed.
AlcockJ. (2001). The triumph of sociobiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
AndrewsP. W., GangestadS. W., & MatthewsD. (2002). Adaptationism—how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–504.
3.
BarkowJ., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ.. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BickleJ. (2003). Philosophy and neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive account. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
5.
BussD. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
6.
BussD. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BussD. M., HaseltonM. G., ShackelfordT. K., BleskeA. L., & WakefieldJ. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548.
8.
ChomskyN. (1996). Powers and prospects: Reflections on human nature and the social order. St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
9.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In BarkowJ. H., ToobyL. Cosmides and J., The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
DaviesP. S. (2002). Does past selective efficacy matter to psychology?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 513–514.
11.
DawkinsR. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
DawkinsR. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford, England: Freeman.
13.
DeCarvalhoR. J. (1991). The founders of humanistic psychology. New York: Praeger.
14.
DennettD. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. London: Penguin Books.
15.
DennettD. (1998). Brainchildren: Essays on designing minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
DennettD. (2003). The mythical threat of genetic determinism. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49B7
17.
DupréJ. (2002). Ontology is the problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 516–517.
18.
DurrantR., & HaigB. D. (2001). How to pursue the adaptationist program in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 357–380.
EllisB. J., & KetelaarT. (2000). On the natural selection of alternative models: Evaluations of explanations in evolutionary psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 56–68.
21.
EllisB. J., & KetelaarT. (2002). Clarifying the foundations of evolutionary psychology: A reply to Lloyd and Feldman. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 157–164.
22.
FeenbergA. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
23.
FodorJ. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, England: MIT Press.
24.
GoldsmithH., GernsbacherM. A., CrabbeJ., DawsonG., GottesmanI. I., HewittJ., (2003). Research psychologists' roles in the genetic revolution. American Psychologist, 58, 318–319.
25.
GottliebG. (2000). Environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 93–97.
26.
GottliebG. (2002). Individual development and evolution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
GouldS. J., & LewontinC. R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marcos and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 581–598.
28.
HarréR. (1984). Personal being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
HarréR. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.
KériS. (2003). Genetics, psychology, and determinism. American Psychologist, 58, 319.
33.
KetelaarT., & EllisB. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 1–21.
34.
KrebsD. L. (2003). Fictions and facts about evolutionary approaches to human behavior: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 842–847.
35.
KrebsJ. R., & DaviesN. B.. (1997). Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
36.
KuoZ. Y. (1929). Purposive behavior and prepotent stimulus. Psychological Review, 36, 547–550.
37.
KuoZ. Y. (1930). The genesis of the cat's response to the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 11(1), 1–35.
38.
KuoZ. Y. (1932). Ontogeny of embryonic behavior in aves. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 61(3), 395–430.
39.
LehrmanD. S. (1953). A critique of Lorenz, Konrad ‘Theory of Instinctive Behavior.’Quarterly Review of Biology, 28(4), 337–363.
40.
LehrmanD. S. (1958). Effect of female sex hormones on incubation behavior in the Ring Dove (Streptopelia-Risoria). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51(2), 142–145.
41.
LewontinR. C. (1979). Sociobiology as an adaptationist program. Behavioral Science, 24, 5–14.
LickliterR., & HoneycuttH. (2003b). Developmental dynamics and contemporary evolutionary psychology: Status quo or irreconcilable views? Reply to Bjorklund (2003), Krebs (2003), Buss and Reeve (2003), Crawford (2003), and Tooby et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 866–872.
44.
LloydE. A., & FeldmanM. W. (2002). Evolutionary psychology: A view from evolutionary biology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 150–156.
45.
MasonW. A. (1997). Discovering behavior. American Psychologist, 52, 713–720.
46.
MasonW. A., & MendozaP. (1998). Generic aspects of primate attachments: Parents, offspring and mates. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 765–778.
47.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
PankseppJ., & PankseppJ. B. (2000). The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Cognition, 6(2), 108–130.
49.
PankseppJ., & PankseppJ. B. (2001). A continuing critique of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Cognition, 7(1), 1–25.
50.
PatenaudeA. F., GuttmacherA. E., & CollinsF. S. (2002). Genetic testing and psychology: New roles, new responsibilities. American Psychologist, 57, 271–282.
51.
PinkerS. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Harper Collins.
52.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
53.
PinkerS. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London: Penguin Books.
54.
PinkerS., & BloomP. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–727.
55.
PopperK. (1986). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.
56.
RidleyM. (2004). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience and what makes us human. London: Harper Perennial.
57.
RoseH., & RoseS.. (2000). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London: Jonathan Cape.
RoseS., LewontinR. C., & KaminL. J. (1990). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. London: Penguin Books.
60.
SimondonG. (1958). Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. [Mode of existence of the technical objects]. Paris: Aubier.
61.
SmithE. A., Borgerhoff MulderM., & HillK. (2001). Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: A guide for the perplexed. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16(3), 128–135.
62.
SoberE. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ. H., CosmidesL. & ToobyJ., The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York, Oxford University Press.
64.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (2003). Elements of a Darwinian theory of Lamarckian inheritance. Presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
65.
ToobyJ., CosmidesL., & BarrettH. C. (2003). The second law of thermodynamics is the first law of psychology: Evolutionary developmental psychology and the theory of tandem, coordinated inheritances: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 858–865.
66.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellBernard, Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
67.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
WilliamsG. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
WilsonE. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
WilsonE. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
WrightR. (1996). The moral animal: Evolutionary psychology and everyday life. London: Abacus.
