Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

Browse

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Sage Publications. All rights reserved. This website is technically supported and operated by China National Publications Import and Export (Group) Co., Ltd. 京ICP备09090397号-11

1352: For Better,for Worse: A Pilot Study to Choose the Ideal Risk Stratification tool for Acute Coronary Syndromes

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Journal indexing and metrics

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Abstract

First published online April, 2004

1352: For Better,for Worse: A Pilot Study to Choose the Ideal Risk Stratification tool for Acute Coronary Syndromes

and

Volume 3, Issue 1

https://doi.org/10.1017/147451510400300153

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Restricted access

A Clinical Comparison of Triazolam with Placebo and with Secobarbital in Insomniac Patients

Restricted access

An Alternative View of Psychological Well-Being in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Considering Temperament and Character

Restricted access

FMMP6 What are the Beliefs of Lebanese Adults about Cardiac Illness?

Restricted access

33 Oral Complications of Femoral Artery Manual Compression after Interventional and Diagnostic Procedures in Paediatric and GUCH Patients. The Nurses Role in Improving Quality of Care