Although we appreciate a number of the points made in the response by Hoffman et al, 1 it is important to recognize several key limitations in the presented reasoning and interpretations. Notably, the response failed to define drinking to thirst (DTT) and did not consider the varying hydration needs and challenges of those who engage in sporting activities beyond the scope of endurance running. Further, exertional hyponatremia prompted the first description of the DTT approach to rehydration. However, Hoffman et al did not address exertional hyponatremia and its association with DTT beyond noting that it is prompted by excessive fluid intake, and they presented no evidence that DTT reduces the risk of exertional hyponatremia, because that evidence does not exist, to our knowledge.
Maintenance of circulating blood volume, in the presence of an accumulating total body water deficit, does not indicate the absence of an effect or burden on other fluid compartments, physical performance, or exercise metabolism. Thus, the argument by Hoffman et al 1 does not support relying solely on DTT. We present the case for a more objective approach based on individualized sweating rate for the following reasons. First, the maintenance of plasma volume precludes primary sensory neurons in the hypothalamus and cardiac atria from initiating significant thirst that is typically prompted by altered plasma osmolality and/or volume. Second, fluid intake also is highly variable due to unique individual responses to the perceptual integration of oropharyngeal sensations, stomach fullness, beverage characteristics, exercise mode/duration, and ambient temperature. This complexity explains why DTT is difficult to define and investigate in a systematic manner. Furthermore, thirst is fleeting—that is, consuming water causes it to diminish or disappear. 2 –4
In the studies that Hoffman et al use to support DTT, we grant that performance was not compromised. However, thirst sensation cannot be confirmed to be the sole, or even primary, contributing factor prompting fluid intake in these studies, because DTT is not equivalent to self-selected or ad libitum fluid intake. Trained distance athletes likely exhibit drinking behavior influenced by individual performance history and a number of other factors that cannot be delineated or accurately weighted as they contribute to ad libitum fluid intake. Notably, a measurable degree of hypohydration can indeed reduce strength, power, local muscular endurance, and cardiovascular endurance. 5 Further, decrements in prolonged endurance exercise are evident even with a minor (ie, 1.5%) body weight loss. 6 –8 Cardiovascular and thermal strain also are progressively exacerbated with fixed (or forced) pacing/intensity. 9
Hoffman et al 1 indicate that methodologies used in controlled laboratory studies “render them invalid in determining the real impact of hypohydration during out-of-doors conditions.” We acknowledge that a lack of convective cooling is a practical limitation; however, this is somewhat offset by the absence of solar radiation in a laboratory environment. Additionally, they neglect to cite contrary evidence of competitive and paced studies conducted in field settings.10,11 We further argue that body weight loss and finish time interpretations in field studies are often measurably compromised by insufficient evidence and insight regarding the factors that contribute to body weight change (eg, voiding bladder and bowel just prior to race start) or performance (eg, training, diet, years of experience, age). That is, a single measure correlation does not provide sufficient evidence for causal statements regarding a complex outcome such as race finish time. 12
Also, we refute the notion that sodium replacement plays no role in exertional muscle cramping. Skeletal muscle cramps have multiple etiologies, including comparatively sudden-onset, localized muscle cramps related to muscle overload or fatigue and intermittent, progressively widespread muscle cramping prompted by a whole-body exchangeable sodium deficit and a contracted interstitial fluid compartment. 13 For those athletes who sweat excessively, especially repeatedly, it is important to closely match daily sodium intake with individual sweat sodium losses, so that body water is better retained and distributed to all fluid compartments. This underscores the value of an individualized rehydration plan in achieving complete rehydration. Notably, after extensive exercise and significant sweat losses, circulating sodium concentration is predictably normal or somewhat elevated. Accordingly, postexercise serum sodium concentration should not be used to indicate the presence or absence of a whole-body exchangeable sodium deficit. 14
We again recognize a continuum of progressive and varying hydration needs in different athletic activities that require different hydration strategies—whereas, Hoffman et al 1 apparently consider a DTT hydration strategy for elite finishers of marathon road races to be applicable to all athletes in all scenarios. However, there are numerous practical sport applications in which this approach fails to be a universally effective guideline that is suitable for all participants.
Finally, we agree that thirst-guided drinking has survival value in the wilds of nature, where the fittest survive. However, it is logically erroneous to extend this premise to modern-day running and cycling events that last 7 to 30 hours (ie, in advanced civilizations) because today’s organized, sophisticated, sponsored ultra-endurance events were not selective pressures on the evolution of humans. Moreover, based on our personal field and laboratory observations, we are confident that employing nude or seminude body weight change to assess sweat rate is not impractical, invalid, or dangerous. Indeed, pre-exercise to postexercise body weight fluctuations are affected by exercise duration and intensity, as well as environmental factors—that is precisely the point of being guided by individualized, practical field measurements that simulate training and competition. Accordingly, a hydration strategy that is situation- and individual-specific with a proportionate emphasis on DTT or an advance-planned rehydration strategy in combination with DTT remains a sensible approach with the greatest widespread utility and effectiveness.
Footnotes
Drs. Armstrong and Bergeron have no pertinent disclosures or conflicts of interest. Dr. Johnson discloses that he is currently funded for research by Danone Research, Palaiseau, France.
