OBJECTIVE: The Rion implantable hearing aid (IHA) Ehime (E)-type was developed for ears with middle ear diseases. This study focused on the current status of the patients, device problems, postoperative difficulties, and preventive measures against them.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 30 patients who were implanted with the IHA E-type between 1984 and 1997 and followed up for more than 10 years. Current status of IHA implantees, incidents of device problems, and postoperative troubles and hearing outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: Eleven patients (36.7%) still use the original device. The average period of use was 16.6 ± 3.3 years (21 years at most). The incidence of problems was lower with the second version of the device compared to the first version. Frequencies of the troubles were related to the types of original ear diseases: seven of 17 cases with chronic otitis media (41.2%), two of seven cases with cholesteatoma (28.6%), and two of six cases with tympanosclerosis (33.3%). No cholesteatoma occurred after surgical procedures (i.e., external ear canal closure and tympanic membrane lateralized) (P = 0.06). The device was exposed through a retroauricular skin fistula where the internal coil had been implanted. Significantly fewer infections were observed when the two-stage operation was used (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: For long-term success in implantation of the IHA, careful control of middle ear inflammation and measures against eustachian tube dysfunction are required in addition to technological advancements.
WeitREsquivelCHoistedD.Implantable hearing devices. In: GrasscockMEGulyaAJ, editors. Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed.Ontario: BC Decker Inc; 2003. p. 533–44.
2.
SuzukiJKoderaKYanagiharaN.Evaluation of middle-ear implant: a six-month observation in cats. Acta Otolaryngol1983; 95:646–50.
3.
YanagiharaNSuzukiJGyoKDevelopment of an implantable hearing aid using a piezoelectric vibrator of bimorph design: state of the art. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1984; 92:706–12.
4.
YanagiharaNAritomoHYamanakaEImplantable hearing aid. Report of the first human applications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1987; 113:869–72.
5.
GyoKSaikiTYanagiharaN.Implantable hearing aid using a piezoelectric ossicular vibrator: a speech audiometric study. Audiology1996; 35:271–6.
6.
YanagiharaNHinohiraYGyoK.Surgical rehabilitation of deafness with partially implantable hearing aid using piezoelectric ceramic bimorpli ossicular vibrator. Auris Nasus Larynx1997; 24:91–8.
7.
YanagiharaNSatoHHinohiraYLong-term results using a piezoelectric semi-implantable middle ear hearing device: The Rion Device E-type. Otolaryngol Clin North Am2001; 34:389–400.
8.
GyoKYanagiharaNSaikiTPresent status and outlook of the implantable hearing aid. Am J Otol1990; 11:250–3.
9.
YanagiharaNGyoKHinohiraY.Partially implantable hearing aid using piezoelectric ceramic ossicular vibrator. Results of the implant operation and assessment of the hearing afforded by the device. Otolaryngol Clin North Am1995; 28:85–97.
