OslerW.Aequanimitas with other Addresses to Medical Students, Nurses and Practitioners of Medicine. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston's Son & Co.; 1904: 221.
2.
TenopirCKingDWBushA.Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: Changes over time and comparison with scientists. J Med Libr Assoc2004;92:233–41.
3.
ScheinMPaladuguRSutijaV. What American surgeons read: A survey of a thousand fellows of the American College of Surgeons. Curr Surg2000;57:252–8.
4.
SaintSChristakisDASahaS. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med2000;15:881–4.
5.
BentsianovBRosenfeldRMEvidence-based medicine in otolaryngology journals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002;126:371–6.
6.
JeffersonTAldersonPWagerE. Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review. JAMA2002;287:2784–6.
7.
McKibbonKAWilczynskiNLHaynesRBWhat do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? BMC Medicine2004;2:1–13.
8.
RosenfeldRMCritical evaluation of articles about otitis media. In: RosenfeldRMBluestoneCD, eds. Evidence-Based Otitis Media, 2nd Edition. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc.2003:9–27.
9.
HaynesRBLoose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Ann Inter Med1990;113:724–8.
10.
GoodmanT (editor) The Forbes Book of Business Quotations. 14,266 Thoughts on the Business of Life. New York: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers; 1997:704.