IpSFuLBalkE. Update on acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 124. (Prepared by Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0022). AHRQ Publication No 05-E020-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
5.
AnonJBJacobsMRPooleMD. Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitisOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg2004;130(1 Suppl):1–45
6.
SandeMAGwaltneyJM. Acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis: continuing challenges and current managementClin Infect Dis2004;39(Suppl)3:S151–S8
7.
PooleMD. Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: clinical impact of resistance and susceptibilityAm J Med2004;117(Suppl 3A):29S–38S
8.
WoodcockJMAndrewsJMBrenwaldNP. The in-vitro activity of faropenem, a novel oral penemJ Antimicrob Chemother1997;39:35–43
9.
CritchleyIAKarlowskyJADraghiDC. Activities of faropenem, an oral beta-lactam, against recent U.Sisolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2002;46:550–5
10.
JonesMEBlosser-MiddletonRSCritchleyIA. Activity of faropenem, a new furanem, against European respiratory pathogens collected during 2000-2001: a comparison with other beta-lactam agentsJ Antimicrob Chemother2003;51:196–9
11.
du PlessisMCapperTPKlugmanKP. In vitro activity of faropenem against respiratory pathogensJ Antimicrob Chemother2002;49:575–7
12.
InoueEMitsuhashiS. In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of SY555, a new oral penem antibioticAntimicrob Agents Chemother1994;38:1974–9
13.
SinghSEcholsR. Prospective, multi-center, nonblind, uncontrolled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of faropenem daloxate 300 mg PO, BID for 7 days in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS). Study 100287. Proceeding of the 45th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. New Orleans, LA, Abstract L-574, 2005.
14.
Food and Drug Administration.FDA Guidance for Industry. Acute bacterial sinusitis—developing antimicrobial drugs for treatment, July 1998.Bethesda, MD: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research;1998.
15.
DmitrienkoAOffenWWestfallP. Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significantStat Med2003;22:2387–400
16.
JuliousSA. Tutorial in biostatistics: sample sizes for clinical trials with normal dataStat Med2004;23:1921–86
17.
MorikawaTYoshidaM. A useful testing strategy in phase III trials: combined test of superiority and test of equivalenceJ Biopharmaceut Stat1995;5:297–306
18.
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP).Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products; 2000, London, UK
19.
SiegertRBergOGehannoP. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of faropenem medoxomil and cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adultsEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2003;260:186–94
20.
IMS: National Disease & Therapeutic Index Audit, June 2005 (Adult Antibiotic Market, Oral Solids (excluding chewables)