AvivJETakoudesTMaG. Office-based esophagoscopy: a preliminary reportOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg2001;125:170–5
11.
PostmaGNBachKKBelafskyPC. The role of transnasal esophagoscopy in head and neck oncologyLaryngoscope2002;112:2242–3
12.
KoufmanJABelafskyPCBachKK. Prevalence of esophagitis in patients with pH-documented laryngopharyngeal refluxLaryngsocope2002;112:1606–9
13.
BelafskyPC. Office endoscopy for the laryngologist/bronchoesophagologistCurr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002;10:467–71
14.
CatanzaroAFaulxAIsenbergGA. Prospective evlation of 4 mm diameter endoscopes for esophagoscopy in sedated and unsedated ptsGastrointest Endosc2003;57:300–4
15.
FaulxALCatanzaroAZyzanskiS. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin endoscopyGastrointest Endosc 2202;55:620–3
16.
ZamanAHahnMHapkeR. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal endosocpy using ultrathin video endoscopeGastrointest Endosc1999;49:279–84
17.
MokhashiMSWildiSMGlennTF. A prospective, blinded study of diagnostic esophagoscopy with a superthin, stand-alone, battery-powered esophagoscopeAm J Gastro2003;98:2383–9
WildiSMGlennTFWoolsonRF. Is esophagoscopy alone sufficient for patients with reflux symptoms?Gastrointest Endosc2004;59:349–54
20.
ReavisKMMorrisCDGopalDV. Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms better predict the presence of esophageal adenocarcinoma than typical gastroesophageal reflux symptomsAnn Surg2004;239:849–56
21.
WinkelsteinA. Peptic esophagitis: a new clinical entityJAMA1935;104:906–9
22.
BarrettNR. Chronic peptic ulcer of the oesophagus and “oesophagitis.”Br J Surg1950;38:175–82
23.
AllisonPRJohnstoneAS. The oesophagus lined with gastric mucosa membraneThorax1953;8:87–101
24.
MoralesCPSpechlerSJ. Intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction: Barrett's, bacteria and biomarkersAm J Gastro2003;98:759–62
25.
SpechlerSJGoyalRK. The columnar lined esophagus, intestinal metaplasia, and Norman BarrettGastroenterology1996;110:614–21
26.
NaefAPSavaryMOzzelloL. Columnar-lined lower esophagus: an acquired lesion with malignant predisposition: report on 140 cases of Barrett's esophagus with 12 adenocarcnimoasJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1975;70:826–35
27.
KocherHMPatelSLinklaterK. Increase in incidence of oesophagosgastric carcinoma in the south Thames region: an epidemiological studyBr J Surg2000;87:362–73
28.
BrockMVGouMAkiyamaY. Prognostic importance of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in esophageal adenocarcinomaClin Cancer Res.2003;9(8):2879–81
29.
DeveaSSBlotWJFraumeniJF. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United StatesCancer1998;83:2049–53
30.
ReidBJBlountPLRabinovitchPS. Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagusGastroint Endoscopy Clin N Am2003;13:369–97
31.
LockeGRIIITalleyNJFettSL. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesopahgeal reflux: a population-based study in Olmstead County, MinnesotaGastroenterology1997;112:1448–56
32.
SpechlerSJZeroogianJMAntonioloiDa. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junctionLancet1994;344:1533–6
33.
LundOKimoseHHAagardMT. Risk stratification and long-term results after surgical treatment of carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus and cardia: a 25-year retrospective studyJ Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg1990;99:200–9
34.
FarrowDCVaughnTL. Determinants of survival following the diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (United States)Cancer Causes Control1996;7:322–7
35.
PetersJHClarkGWIrelandAP. Outcome of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus in endoscopically surveyed and nonsurveyed patientsJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1994;108:813–21
36.
ChanMF. Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopyGastrointest Endosc Clin N Am1996;6:287–303
37.
FleischerDEVan deMFEisenGM. A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importanceGastrointest Endosc1997;45:128–33
38.
BiniEJFirooziBRosaJ. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes studyGastrointest Endosc2003;57:8–16