OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine factors students perceive as influential in decision to pursue otolaryngology; 2) to determine perception of importance of factors used for resident selection and individual student commitment to the match; and 3) to identify exposure to various subspecialties within otolaryngology.
DESIGN: Population survey.
METHODS: A survey was administered to students applying for otolaryngology between 2000 and 2003 at a single institution.
RESULTS: Ninety-six students were interviewed. Seventy-eight percent believed that the main factor influencing their decision to pursue otolaryngology was their exposure to the residents. Board scores and one-on-one interviews were important factors in selection of interviewees and ranking process. Interestingly, over 20% of students believed that the match should not be early because they wanted more time to commit to ENT.
CONCLUSIONS: These data underscore the importance that residents have in directing future students to our specialty. Results of the match survey may indicate an attrition rate within residency programs that may be avoided if ENT were part of the “regular” match.
EBM RATING: C
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurackJHIrbyDMCarlineJD, et al. A study of medical students' specialty-choice pathways: Trying on possible selves. Acad Med1997;72:534–41.
2.
ErzurumVZObermeyerRJFecherA, et al. What influences medical students' choice of surgical careers. Surgery2000;128:253–6.
3.
Otolaryngology Match Report Comparative Statistics, Otolaryngology Matching Program. In. San Francisco, CA; 2002.
4.
RosenthalMPDiamondJJRabinowitzHK, et al. Influence of income, hours worked, and loan repayment on medical students' decision to pursue a primary care career. JAMA1994;271:914–7.
5.
LindDSCendanJCTwo decades of student career choice at the University of Florida: Increasingly a lifestyle decision. Am Surg2003; 69:53–5.
6.
SchwartzRWJareckyRKStrodelWE, et al. Controllable lifestyle: A new factor in career choice by medical students. Acad Med1989;64:606–9.
7.
DorseyERJarjouraDRuteckiGWInfluence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA2003;290:1173–8.
8.
RosenthalEClarkJMWaxMK, et al. Emerging perceptions of facial plastic surgery among medical students. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2001;125:478–82.
9.
AshikawaHXuGVeloskiJJStudents' ratings of otolaryngology clerkship activities: The role of residents. Med Teach1992;14:77–81.
10.
CalhounKHHokansonJABaileyBJPredictors of residency performance: A follow-up study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1997;116:647–51.
11.
WardPHThe selection and training of students and residents. Laryngoscope1995;105:893–5.
