STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2000).
RESULTS: A total of 9778 admissions with admitting diagnosis “epistaxis” were identified. Among admissions involving 1 treatment, 454 (9.6%) received arterial ligation, 94 (2.0%) embolization, and 4188 (88.4%) nasal packing. There were no differences in length of stay, transfusions, complications, or deaths between groups (all P >0.05). Mean total hospital charges were $6,282 for the packing group, $12,805 for the ligation group, and $17,517 for the embolization group; differences between ligation and packing groups, and embolization and packing groups demonstrated significance (P >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal packing is used commonly for epistaxis that requires inpatient management. Although embolization and arterial ligation are associated with higher hospital charges, complications, transfusion rates, and lengths of stay are similar. Further studies are needed to quantify other outcome measures, such as recurrence rates and patient quality of life.
SIGNIFICANCE: Nasal packing is associated with lower hospital charges and similar complication rates as arterial ligation or embolization. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:707-12.)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MonteEBelmontMWaxM.Management paradigms for posterior epistaxis: a comparison of costs and complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 121:103–6. (Grade C).
2.
SchaitkinBStraussMHouckJ.Epistaxis: medical versus surgical therapy: a comparison of efficacy, complications, and economic considerations. Laryngoscope1987; 97:1392–6. (Grade C).
3.
PollicePYoderM.Epistaxis: a retrospective review of hospitalized patients. Otolarngol Head Neck Surg1997; 117:49–53. (Grade C).
4.
MoñuxATomásMKaiserC.Conservative management of epistaxis. J Laryngol Otol1990; 104:868–70. (Grade C).
5.
KlotzDWinkleMRichmonJ. Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: a changing paradigm. Laryngoscope2002; 112:1577–82. (Grade C).
6.
WangLVogelD.Posterior epistaxis: comparison of treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1981; 89:1001–6. (Grade C).
7.
RosnagleRYanagisawaESmithH.Specific vessel ligation for epistaxis: survey of 60 cases. Laryngoscope1983; 83:517–25. (Grade C).
8.
SmallMMaranA.Epistaxis and arterial ligation. J Laryngol Otol1984; 98:281–4. (Grade C).
9.
HajjarIKotchenTA.Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA2003; 290:199–206. (Grade C).
10.
SorofJMLaiDTurnerJ. Overweight, ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children. Pediatrics2004; 113:475–82. (Grade C).
11.
TanLCalhounK.Otolaryngology for the internist: epistaxis. Medical Clin North Am1999; 83:43–55. (Grade D).
12.
FusterVDykenMVokonasP. Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in cardiovascular disease. Circulation1993; 87:659–71. (Grade D).
13.
TsengENarducciCWillingS. Angiographic embolization for epistaxis: a review of 114 cases. Laryngoscope1998; 108:615–9. (Grade C).
