Objectives: A maternal autosomal recessive mutation causing recurrent biparentally inherited complete hydatidiform moles (BiCHM) in affected women was previously mapped to a 12.4-cM interval in 19q 13.4, which was recently further narrowed to a smaller 1.1-Mb region at the centromeric end. It is believed that the mutant gene in this condition is a major contributor to the regulation of imprinting in the maternal germline. To confirm and possibly narrow the critical interval we studied additional rare familial and recurrent cases.
Methods: Using polymorphic marker analysis, we first confirmed biparental inheritance on the studied molar tissues. We then performed targeted homozygosity mapping with markers in 19q 13.4 on DNA from affected women of a new large consanguineous pedigree, an additional potentially familial case, and three cases with sporadic recurrent CHM. Direct sequencing of coding exons and Southern analysis with a coding-region probe for one candidate gene (NALP5) was also performed.
Results: Biparental inheritance was confirmed for those molar tissues available for analysis. All women, except for one of the isolated cases, were homozygous for markers in the identified 1. 1-Mb region in 19q13.4. No mutations or large genomic rearrangements were found in NALP5 (MATER), a gene with oocyte-specfic expression. Heterozygosity for a single-nucleotide polymorphism in exon 13 of NALP5 in one patient may refine the candidate region to 1.0 Mb.
Conclusions: The reported candidate region for BiCHM in 19q13.4 was confirmed in additional families, further establishing it as the major locus that harbors a gene mutated in this condition.
1. Fisher RA, Hodges MD, Rees HC, et al. The maternally transcribed gene p57(KIP2) (CDNK1C) is abnormally expressed in both androgenetic and biparental complete hydatidiform moles. Hum Mol Genet2002;11:3267-3272.
2.
2. Szulman AE, Surti U. The syndromes of hydatidiform mole. I. Cytogenetic and morphologic correlations. Am J Obstet Gynecol1978;131:665-671.
3.
3. Szulman AE. Trophoblastic diseases: Complete and partial hydatidiform moles. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1999.
4.
4. Kovacs BW, Shahbahrami B, Tast DE, Curtin JP. Molecular genetic analysis of complete hydatidiform moles. Cancer Genet Cytogenet1991;54:143-152.
5.
5. Helwani MN, Seoud M, Zahed L, Zaatari G, Khalil A, Slim R. A familial case of recurrent hydatidiform molar pregnancies with biparental genomic contribution. Hum Genet1999;105:112-115.
6.
6. Ambani LM, Vaidya RA, Rao CS, Daftary SD, Motashaw ND. Familial occurrence of trophoblastic disease—Report of recurrent molar pregnancies in sisters in three families. Clin Genet1980;18:27-29.
7.
7. Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Mangili G. Familial trophoblastic disease: case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol1984;149:382-383.
8.
8. Kircheisen R, Schroeder-Kurth T. [Familial hydatidiform mole syndrome and genetic aspects of this disturbed trophoblast development]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd1991;51:569-571.
9.
9. Seoud M, Khalil A, Frangieh A, Zahed L, Azar G, Nuwayri-Salti N. Recurrent molar pregnancies in a family with extensive intermarriage: report of a family and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol1995;86:692-695.
10.
10. Sensi A, Gualandi F, Pittalis MC, et al. Mole maker phenotype: Possible narrowing of the candidate region. Eur J Hum Genet2000;8:641-644.
11.
11. Judson H, Hayward BE, Sheridan E, Bonthron DT. A global disorder of imprinting in the human female germ line. Nature2002;416:539-542.
12.
12. Hodges MD, Rees HC, Seckl MJ, Newlands ES, Fisher RA. Genetic refinement and physical mapping of a biparental complete hydatidiform mole locus on chromosome 19q13.4. J Med Genet2003;40:e95-e95.
13.
13. Moglabey YB, Kircheisen R, Seoud M, El Mogharbel N, Van den Veyver I, Slim R. Genetic mapping of a maternal locus responsible for familial hydatidiform moles. Hum Mol Genet1999;8:667-671.
14.
14. Shannon M, Ashworth LK, Mucenski ML, Lamerdin JE, Branscomb E, Stubbs L. Comparative analysis of a conserved zinc finger gene cluster on human chromosome 19q and mouse chromosome 7. Genomics1996;33:112-120.
15.
15. Stubbs L, Carver EA, Shannon ME, et al. Detailed comparative map of human chromosome 19q and related regions of the mouse genome. Genomics1996;35:499-508.
16.
16. Kim J, Ashworth L, Branscomb E, Stubbs L. The human homolog of a mouse-imprinted gene, Peg3, maps to a zinc finger gene-rich region of human chromosome 19q13.4. Genome Res1997;7:532-540.
17.
17. Kim J, Bergmann A, Stubbs L. Exon sharing of a novel human zinc-finger gene, ZIM2, and paternally expressed gene 3 (PEG3). Genomics2000;64:114-118.
18.
18. Kim J, Bergmann A, Wehri E, Lu X, Stubbs L. Imprinting and evolution of two Kruppel-type zinc-finger genes, ZIM3 and ZNF264, located in the PEG3/USP29 imprinted domain. Genomics2001;77:91-98.
19.
19. Sunde L, Vejerslev LO, Jensen MP, Pedersen S, Hertz JM, Bolund L. Genetic analysis of repeated, biparental, diploid, hydatidiform moles. Cancer Genet Cytogenet1993;66:16-22.
20.
20. Al-Hussaini TK, Abd el-Aal DM, Van den Veyver IB. Recurrent pregnancy loss due to familial and non-familial habitual molar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2003;83:179-186.
21.
21. El-Maarri O, Seoud M, Coullin P, et al. Maternal alleles acquiring paternal methylation patterns in biparental complete hydatidiform moles. Hum Mol Genet2003;12:1405-1413.
22.
22. Al-Hussaini TK, Abdel-Alim MA. Habitual complete molar pregnancy: a case report. Reprod Biomed Online2001;3:133-135.
23.
23. Stockton DW, Lewis RA, Abboud EB, et al. A novel locus for Leber congenital amaurosis on chromosome 14q24. Hum Genet1998;103:328-333.
24.
24. Van den Veyver IB, Subramanian S, Zoghbi HY. Genomic structure of a human holocytochrome c-type synthetase gene in Xp22.3 and mutation analysis in patients with Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet1998;78:179-181.
25.
25. Shaffer LG, Kennedy GM, Spikes AS, Lupski JR. Diagnosis of CMT1A duplications and HNPP deletions by interphase FISH: Implications for testing in the cytogenetics laboratory. Am J Med Genet1997;69:325-331.
26.
26. Fisher RA, Khatoon R, Paradinas FJ, Roberts AP, Newlands ES. Repetitive complete hydatidiform mole can be biparental in origin and either male or female. Hum Reprod2000;15:594-598.
27.
27. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature2001;409:860-921.
28.
28. Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Diekhans M, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser Database. Nucleic Acids Res2003;31:51-54.
29.
29. Howell CY, Bestor TH, Ding F, et al. Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell2001;104:829-838.
30.
30. Tong ZB, Bondy CA, Zhou J, Nelson LM. A human homologue of mouse Mater, a maternal effect gene essential for early embryonic development. Hum Reprod2002;17:903-911.
31.
31. Tong ZB, Gold L, Pfeifer KE, et al. Mater, a maternal effect gene required for early embryonic development in mice. Nat Genet2000;26:267-268.
32.
32. Miyamoto T, Hasuike S. Isolation and expression analysis of the human RNH2 gene encoding ribonuclease inhibitor 2. J Assist Reprod Genet2002;19:394-397.
33.
33. Grenier JM, Wang L, Manji GA, et al. Functional screening of five PYPAF family members identifies PYPAF5 as a novel regulator of NF-kappaB and caspase-1. FEBS Lett2002;530:73-78.
34.
34. Wang PJ, McCarrey JR, Yang F, Page DC. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat Genet2001;27:422-426.
35.
35. Rajkovic A, Lee JH, Yan C, Matzuk MM. The ret finger protein-like 4 gene, Rfpl4, encodes a putative E3 ubiquitinprotein ligase expressed in adult germ cells. Mech Dev2002;112:173-177.
36.
36. Suzumori N, Burns KH, Yan W, Matzuk MM. RFPL4 interacts with oocyte proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2003;100:550-555.
37.
37. Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E. Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development2002;129:1983-1993.
38.
38. Hayward BE, De Vos M, Judson H, et al. Lack of involvement of known DNA methyltransferases in familial hydatidiform mole implies the involvement of other factors in establishment of imprinting in the human female germiline. BMC Genet2003;4:2-2.
