Abstract
Background/Purpose
It is unclear whether implant removal is necessary when deep spine infection of spinal instrumentation occurs. This study compares mortality, relapse, and reoperation rates between such patients with and without removal of spine implants.
Methods
A total of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics of the implant removal and nonremoval groups were compared. Outcome measures between groups were compared using multivariable logistic regression and predictors of each outcome identified.
Results
There were no significant differences in mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates between groups. Multiple vertebral level involvement was common (85%), and the L4 (30%) and L5 (35%) levels were most commonly involved. The majority of patients had osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis (50%) and Staphylococcus aureus infections (60%). Thoracic spine infection was associated with relapse (odds ratio = 1.26) and reoperation (odds ratio = 1.101).
Conclusion
Implant removal is not always necessary in cases of deep spine infection as retention of implants is not associated with higher mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates.
