Abstract
Background
Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty is a well-established procedure for the treatment of displaced intracapsular fracture neck of femur in the elderly. However, considerable debate exists regarding the use of cemented prosthesis in this elderly group of patients. The main purpose of our study was to analyse the outcomes following cemented and uncemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty of the hip with particular reference to cement-related morbidity and 30-day mortality.
Methods
Of the 110 patients who underwent Thompson hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture, 30 (27.3%) had cemented and 80 (72.7%) had uncemented prosthesis. The mean age was 83.2 years with 87 female patients. The thigh pain and mobility at discharge, the inpatient complications and the 30-day mortality rates were compared between the cemented and uncemented groups.
Results
The study revealed no statistically significant differences in any of the postoperative outcome measures between the two groups.
Conclusion
Cemented and uncemented Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty have similar outcomes at discharge. Patients who underwent cementation without pressurisation did not show any higher incidence of bone cement implantation syndrome compared to their uncemented counterparts. Uncemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty can be an option in patients with very poor cardiopulmonary reserve without any significant complications in the short term.