In this paper the authors share their experiences of conducting qualitative research interviews with men about health and illness. Practical issues including interviewer preparation and questioning techniques as well as the nuances of talking with men about matters that are commonly considered to be outside male expertise and interest are discussed. Guidance to ensure that interviews are successful includes recommendations for providing explicit permission for men to break with the ideals of what men talk about, strategies for meeting the challenges of the diverse behaviour of interviewees, and considerations about the need for reflexive interviewing. Valuable insight is offered that pre-empts an awareness of the complexities, as well as stressing the value of men interviewing men about health and illness that is intended to prompt researchers to consider and reconsider the intricacies of interview-based research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CourtenayW.H.Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med, 2000; 50(10):1385–1401.
2.
CourtenayW.H.Making health manly: social marketing and men's health. The Journal of Men's Health & Gender, 2004; 1(2–3):275–276.
3.
GibsonM, DennerBJ.Men's Health Report 2000: The MAN Model. Pathways to men's health. 2000. Daylesford, Victoria, Australia, Centre for Advancement of Men's Health.
4.
HugginsA.The Australian Male: Illness, Injury and Death by Socialisation - A paradox of Health. In: LawsT. editor. Promoting Men's health - An Essential Book for Nurses. Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed Publications; 1998. p. 3–14.
5.
LeeC., OwensR.G.The psychology of men's health. Philadelphia, Pa: Open University Press; 2002.
6.
TaylorC., StewartA., ParkerR.Machismo as the Barrier to Health Promotion in Australian Males. In: LawsT. editor. Promoting Men's health - An Essential Book for Nurses. Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed Publications; 1998. p. 15–30.
7.
ZigurasC.Masculinity and Self-Care. In: LawsT. editor. Promoting Men's health - An Essential Book for Nurses. Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed Publications; 1998. p. 45–61.
8.
ChappleA., ZieblandS., ShepperdS., MillerR., HerxheimerA., McPhersonA.Why men with prostate cancer want wider access to prostate specific antigen testing: qualitative study. BMJ, 2002; 325(7367):737–739.
9.
ChappleA., ZieblandS., HerxheimerA., McPhersonA., ShepperdS., MillerR.Is ’watchful waiting’ a real choice for men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study. Br J Urol Int, 2002; 90(3):257–264.
10.
ChappleA., ZieblandS.Prostate cancer: embodied experience and perceptions of masculinity. Sociol Health Illn, 2002; 24(6):820–841.
11.
CharmazK.Men's Studies Association. Identity Dilemmas of Chronically Ill Men. In: SaboD.F., GordonD editors.Men's health and illness: Gender, power, and the body. Thousand Oaks: Calif: Sage Publications; 1995. p. 266–291.
12.
CourtenayW.H.College men's health: an overview and a call to action. J Am Coll Health, 1998; 46(6):279–290.
13.
FitchM.I., GrayR., FranssenE., JohnsonB.Men's perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: implications for oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2000; 27(8):1255–1263.
14.
FletcherR.J., HigginbothamN., DobsonA.Men's perceived health needs. J Health Psychol, 2002; 7(3):233–241.
15.
GordonD.F.Men's Studies Association. Testicular Cancer and Masculinity. In: SaboD.F., GordonD. editors. Men's Health and Illness: Gender, Power, and the Body. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1995. p. 248–265.
16.
NavonL., MoragA.Advanced prostate cancer patients’ ways of coping with the hormonal therapy's effect on body, sexuality, and spousal ties. Qual Health Res, 2003; 13(10):1378–1392.
17.
NavonL., MoragA.Advanced prostate cancer patients’ relationships with their spouses following hormonal therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2003; 7(2):73–80.
18.
NavonL., MoragA.Liminality as biographical disruption: unclassifiability following hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Soc Sci Med, 2004; 58(11):2337–2347.
19.
OliffeJ.Constructions of Masculinity following prostatectomy - induced impotence. Soc Sci Med, 2005; 60(10):2249–2259.
20.
HerodA.Gender Issues in the Use of Interviewing As A Research Method. Prof Geogr, 1993; 45(3):305–317.
21.
HutchinsonS., MarsiglioW., CohanM.Interviewing young men about sex and procreation: Methodological issues. Qual Health Res, 2002; 12(1):42–60.
22.
KruegerR.A.Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1994.
23.
WilliamsC.L., HeikesE.J.The Importance of Researchers Gender in the In-Depth Interview - Evidence from 2 Case-Studies of Male Nurses. Gend Soc, 1993; 7(2):280–291.
24.
ChengC.Marginalized masculinities and hegemonic masculinity: An introduction. J Men's Stud, 1999; 7(3):295–315.
25.
DenzinN.K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 3rd ed.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1989.
26.
GiffordS.M.Analysis of Non-numerical Data. KerrC.B., TaylorR., HeardG.Handbook of public health methods. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 1997; 543–554.
27.
SchwalbeM., WolkomirM.The Masculine Self As Problem and Resource in Interview Studies of Men. Men Masc, 2001; 4(1):90–103.
ConnellR.W.The Men and the Boys. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2000.
30.
ReinharzS., DavidmanL.Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
31.
OakleyA.Interviewing women, a contradiction in terms. In: RobertsH. editor. Doing feminist research, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981. p. 30–61.
32.
De LaineM.Ethnography Theory and Applications in Health Research. Sydney, Australia: MacLennan and Petty; 1997.
33.
CrabtreeB., MillerW.Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992.
34.
AckerJ., BarryK., EsseveldJ.Objectivity and Truth - Problems in Doing Feminist Research. Womens Stud Int Forum, 1983; 6(4):423–435.
35.
RidgeD., HeeA., AroniR.Being ’real’ in suicide prevention evaluation: The role of the ethnographer's emotions under traumatic conditions. Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange, 1999; 5(3):21–32.
