While the increasing sophistication of information technology has led to the spread of virtual organizations, there has been very little research on what factors contribute to individuals’ effectiveness in such organizations. This paper argues that organizations possess different degrees of virtuality based on four dimensions of temporal, spatial, cultural, and organizational dispersion. Using a person-environment fit framework, a theoretical model that identifies individual qualities required to fit into virtual organizations, virtual teams, and virtual jobs is developed, taking into account dimensions and degrees of virtuality. Mechanisms for enhancing fit in virtual organizations as well as theoretical and practical implications of the model are addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, J. D. W.1967. Judgments of fit in the selection process: The role of work-value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47: 605–623.
2.
Barner, R.1996. The new millennium workplace: Seven changes that will challenge managers and workers. The Futurist, 30: 14–18.
3.
Boudreau, M., Loch, K. D., Robey, D., & Straud, D.1998. Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4): 120–128.
4.
Boxx, W. R., Odom, R. Y., & Dunn, M. G.1991. Organizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion. Public Personnel Management, 20: 195–205.
5.
Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A.1994. Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43: 310–327.
6.
Burges, J. R. D., & Russell, J. E. A.2003. The effectiveness of distance learning initiatives in organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 289–303.
7.
Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly, C. A.1990. Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 648–657.
8.
Cascio, W. F., 1999. Virtual workplaces: Implications for organizational behavior. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 6, 1–14. New York: Wiley.
9.
Cascio, W. F.2000. Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14: 81–90.
10.
Chatman, J.1989. Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14: 333–349.
11.
Chatman, J.1991. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 459–484.
12.
Christie, P. M. J., & Levary, R. R., 1998. Virtual corporations: Recipe for success. Industrial Management, July–August: 7–11.
13.
Clancy, T.1994. The latest word from thoughtful executives – The virtual corporation, telecommuting and the concept of team. Academy of Management Executive, 8: 8–10.
14.
Cohen, S. G., & Mankin, D., 1999. Collaboration in the virtual organization. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 6, 105–120. New York: Wiley.
15.
Coyle, J., & Schnarr, N.1995. The soft-side challenges of the “virtual corporation”. Human Resource Planning, 18: 41–42.
16.
Davenport, T. H., & Pearlson, K., 1998. Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Review, Summer: 51–65.
17.
Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S., 1992. The virtual corporation: Structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. New York: Edward Burlingame Books.
18.
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P.1999. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6): 693–703.
19.
DeSanctis, G., Staudenmayer, N., & Wong, S. S., 1999. Interdependence in virtual organizations. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 6, 81–103. New York: Wiley.
20.
DiMartino, V., & Wirth, L.1990. Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129: 529–554.
21.
Driskell, J. E., & Hogan, R., & Salas, E., 1987. Personality and group performance. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 9, 91–112. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Dutton, W. H., 1999. The virtual organization: Tele-access in business and industry. In G. DeSanctis, & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection, and community. Newbury Pack, CA: Sage.
23.
Edwards, J. R., 1991. Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial/organizational psychology: 283–357. New York: Wiley.
24.
Ferris, G. R., Youngblood, S. A., & Yates, V. L.1985. Personality, training performance, and withdrawal: A test of the person-group fit hypothesis for organizational newcomers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27: 377–388.
25.
Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J.1999. Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 254–275.
26.
Grabowski, M., & Roberts, K. H.1999. Risk mitigation in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6): 704–721.
27.
Grenier, R., & Metes, G., 1995. Going virtual: Moving into your organization into the 21st century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Gudykunst, W. B.1997. Cultural variability in communication. Communication Research, 24(4): 327–348.
29.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G., 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 8, 45–99. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Hamilton, B. A., & Scandura, T. A.2003. Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4): 388–402.
31.
Handy, C., 1995. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, May–June: 2–8.
32.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T.2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 1029–1045.
33.
Haythorn, W. W.1968. The composition of groups: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 28: 97–128.
34.
Hollenbeck, J. R.1989. Control theory and the perception of work environments: The effects of focus of attention on affective and behavioral reactions to work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 43: 406–430.
35.
Igbaria, M., & Guimaraes, T.1999. Exploring differences in employee turnover intentions and its determinants among telecommuters and nontelecommuters. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(1): 147–164.
36.
Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K.1991. Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 675–689.
37.
Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A., 1998. Toward a multi-level theory of person-environment fit. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting. San Diego, CA.
38.
Jarillo, J. C., 1993. Strategic networks: Creating the borderless organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E.1998. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4): 1–36.
40.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E.1999. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6): 791–815.
41.
Joinson, C., 2002. HR Magazine, June: 70–73.
42.
Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D.1992. Effects of work values on job choice decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 261–271.
43.
Kasper-Fuehrer, E. C., & Ashkanasy, N. M.2001. Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 27: 235–254.
44.
Kezsbom, D. S., 1999. Creating teamwork in virtual teams. AACE International Transactions: 1–4.
45.
Klimoski, R., & Jones, R. G., 1995. Staffing for effective group decision making: Key issues in matching people and teams. In R. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations: 291–332. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Knoll, K., & Jarvenpaa, S. L., 1998. Working together in global virtual teams. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace: 2–23. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
47.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W.1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53: 1017–1031.
48.
Kraut, R., Steinfield, C., Chan, A. P., Butler, B., & Hoag, A.1999. Coordination and virtualization: The role of electronic networks and personal relationships. Organization Science, 10(6): 722–740.
49.
Kristof, A. L.1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49: 1–49.
50.
Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L.1992. Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review, 17(2): 212–237.
51.
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A.2001. Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59: 454–470.
52.
Leonard, B.1996. Distance learning: Work and training overlap. HR Magazine, 41: 41–47.
53.
Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J., 1997. Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. Strategy and Leadership, January/February: 14–19.
54.
Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A.2003. Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice. Training, 40(1–2): 155–163.
55.
Mankin, D., Cohen, S. C., & Bikson, T. K., 1996. Teams and technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
56.
Mariani, M., 2000. Telecommuters. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Fall: 10–17.
57.
McDonald, T.1995. Brain trust: A new corporate climate favors loose, flexible, idea-based teams. Successful Meetings, 44: 16.
58.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M.2002. Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues, 58: 9–31.
59.
O’Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, R., 1994. Globalwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F.1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 487–516.
61.
Ostroff, C.1993. Relationships between person-environment congruence and organizational effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 18: 103–122.
62.
Posner, B. Z.1992. Person-organization values congruence: No support for individual differences as a moderating influence. Human Relations, 45: 351–361.
63.
Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V.2001. Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. Journal of Management, 27: 383–405.
64.
Robbins, S. P., 2000. Rethinking OB in an E-world. Paper presented via webcast, Orono, ME.
65.
Rodgers, C., & Teicholz, E.2001. Telecommuting & the computer... here today, home tomorrow. Facilities Design and Management, 20: 22–24.
66.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E.1997. A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50: 395–426.
67.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E.2002. Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 646–654.
68.
Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Goldstein, H. W., 1992. Attraction-selection-attrition: Toward a person-environment psychology of organizations. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed.): 61–85. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J., 1994. The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
70.
Shaw, M. E., 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
71.
Simons, T.1995. Virtual reality. Inc, 17: 23–24.
72.
Snow, C. C., Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J., 1999. The virtual organization: Promises and payoffs, large and small. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 6, 15–30. New York: Wiley.
73.
Sparrow, P. R., & Daniels, K., 1999. Human resource management and the virtual organization: Mapping the future research issues. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Vol. 6, 45–61. New York: Wiley.
74.
Staples, D. S.2001. A study of remote workers and their differences from non-remote workers. Journal of End User Computing, 13(2): 3–14.
75.
Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R.1998. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3): 17–29.
76.
Vancouver, J. B., Millsap, R. E., & Peters, P. A.1994. Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 666–679.
77.
Werbel, J. D., & Gilliland, S. W.1999. Person-environment fit in the selection process. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 17: 209–243.
78.
Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J.2001. The use of person-group fit for employee selection: A missing link in person-environment fit. Human Resource Management, 40(3): 227–240.
79.
Zigurs, I.2003. Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity?Organizational Dynamics, 31(4): 339–351.
