The antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile a professional relationship following an incident involving a broken promise were examined in terms of offender tactics (i.e., nature of apology, timeliness of reparative act, sincerity) and relationship characteristics (i.e., nature of past relationship, probability of future violation) using a within- and between-subjects policy-capturing design. Relatively speaking, relationship characteristics were as strongly related to willingness to reconcile as offender tactics. Furthermore, we found moderating effects of magnitude of violation on the willingness to reconcile a relationship following a trust violation. In particular, nature of past relationship was weighed more heavily, whereas probability of future violation was weighed less heavily when the magnitude of the violation was greater. Practical implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO. 2001. Workers’ rights in America: What employees think about their jobs and employers. Survey by Peter D. Hart Research Associates.
2.
Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen S., & Barr, S. 2000. Policy-capturing: A brief tutorial. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, New Orleans.
3.
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J.2001. How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 52–59.
4.
Arrow, K. J.1973. Information and economic behavior. Stockholm: Federation of Swedish Industries.
5.
Bies, R. J.1987a. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 289–319.
6.
Bies, R. J.1987b. Beyond “voice”: The influence of decision maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17: 3–14.
7.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M.1996. Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: 246–260. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K.1999. The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Mangement, 25: 607–631.
9.
Brannick, M. T., & Brannick, J. P.1989. Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 44: 97–122.
10.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A.1994. Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47: 317–348.
11.
Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M.1957. Experimental designs. New York: Wiley.
12.
Cooksey, R. W.1996. Judgement analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
Cords, M., & Aureli, F.2000. Reconcilation and relationship qualities. In G. Aureli & F. deWall (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S.1993. Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 7–22.
15.
Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S.1995. Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 500–509.
16.
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C.1992. Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 2: 99–114.
17.
Ferrin, D. L. 2002. Theory, evidence and an agenda for future research on rebuilding trust. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver.
18.
Festinger, L. A.1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E.1991. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Freedman, S.1998. Forgiveness and reconciliation: The importance of understanding how they differ. Counseling and Values, 42: 200–216.
22.
Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. 2002. Re-establishing trust: The importance of catharsis in the trust rebuilding process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver.
23.
Goffman, E.1972. Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper Row.
24.
Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B.2000. Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Psychology, 22: 291–300.
25.
Graham, M. E., & Cable, D. M.2001. Consideration of the incomplete block design for policy-capturing research. Organizational Research Methods, 4: 26–45.
26.
Greenberg, J.1990. Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 111–157.
27.
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L.1991. Subjective construal, social inference and human understanding. In M. D. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 24, 319–359.
28.
Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E.1977. Statistical methods for social scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc.
29.
Hays, W. L.1981. Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
30.
Hobson, C. J., Mendel, R. M., & Gibson, F. W.1981. Clarifying performance appraisal criteria. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28: 164–188.
31.
Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D., Jr.1992. Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 261–271.
32.
Karren, R. J., & Barringer, M. W.2000, August. An analysis of the policy-capturing method: Issues and suggestions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto.
33.
Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. 2002. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology vs. denial for repairing ability- vs. integrity-based trust violations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver.
34.
Klaas, B. S., & Dell’Omo, G. G.1991. The determinants of disciplinary decisions: The case of employee drug use. Personnel Psychology, 44: 813–835.
35.
Kramer, R. M.1996. Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
36.
Kramer, R. M.1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.
37.
Kurzynski, M. J.1998. The virtue of forgiveness as a human resource strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 77–85.
38.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B.1995. Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin and Associates (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B.1996. Developing and maintaining trust in working relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
40.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A.1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63: 967–985.
41.
Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A.1994. A policy-capturing approach to individuals’ decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57: 358–386.
42.
Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N.1989. Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 219–227.
43.
Orr, J. M., Sackett, P. R., & Mercer, M.1989. The role of prescribed and nonprescribed behaviors in estimating the dollar value of performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 34–40.
44.
Parkhe, A.1998. Understanding trust in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 33: 219–240.
45.
Pugh, S. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2000. Psychological contracts in transition: Assimilation or contrast? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto.
46.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P.1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 95–112.
47.
Robinson, S. L.1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574–599.
48.
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M.1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 245–259.
49.
Ross, W., & LaCroix, J.1996. Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and integrative model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7: 314–360.
50.
Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B.1982. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: A factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Roth, P. L.1994. Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47: 537–560.
52.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C.1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline review of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404.
53.
Rynes, S. L., Schwab, D. P., & Heneman, H. G., III. 1983. A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 620–631.
54.
Rynes, S. L., Weber, C. L., & Milkovich, G. T.1989. Effects of market survey rates, job evaluation, and job gender on job pay. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 114–123.
55.
Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W.1981. The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44: 271–278.
56.
Schlenker, B. R., Pontari, B. A., & Christopher, A. N.2001. Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 15–32.
57.
Shapiro, D. L.1991. The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 614–630.
58.
Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L.1992. Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8: 365–377.
59.
Shapiro, D. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. 2000. Love is blind and forgiveness divine: Reactions to leader’s transgressions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Toronto.
60.
Sitkin, S. B., & Bies, R. J.1993. Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict. Human Relations, 46: 349–370.
61.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Norman, N.1985. Social power, self-presentation, and the self. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life: 293–322. New York: McGraw Hill.
62.
Tomlinson, E. C., Lewicki, R. J., & Dineen, B. R. 2002. Dealing with damaged trust: How to rebuild trust and temper distrust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver.
63.
Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J.1997. Seeking revenge in organizations: An exploration into the hearts and minds of avengers. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6: 145–160.
64.
Webster, J., & Trevino, L. K.1995. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choice: Two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1544–1572.
