AbadaH.T.LarchezC.DaoudB., 2006. MDCT of the coronary arteries:
Feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce
radiation dose. Am. J. Roentgenol.
186 (6Suppl. 2),
387–390.
2.
ACR(American College of Radiology),
2000. ACR Appropriateness Criteria
2000. Radiology215 (Supp.),
1–1511).
3.
AkbarS.A.MorteleK.J.BaeyensK., 2004. Multidetector CT urography:
techniques, clinical applications, and pitfalls. Semin.
Ultrasound CT MR. 25,
41–54.
4.
Ames CastroM.ShippT.D.CastroE.E., 2001. The use of helical computed
tomography in pregnancy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 184,
954–957.
5.
BrennerD.EllistonC.HallE., 2001. Estimated risks of
radiation-induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 176,
289–296.
6.
CapunayC.M.CarrascosaP.M.Bou-KhairA., 2005. Low radiation dose multislice CT
colonography in children: Experience after 100 studies.
Eur. J. Radiol. 56,
398–402.
7.
DiederichS.LenzenH.WindmannR., 1999. Pulmonary nodules: Experimental
and clinical studies at low-dose CT. Radiology213, 289–298.
8.
DiederichS.WormannsD.LenzenH., 2000. Screening for asymptomatic early
bronchogenic carcinoma with 50% reduced-dose CT of the chest.
Cancer. 89,
2483–2484.
9.
EC, 2000b. European
Commission. Referral guidelines for imaging. Radiation protection 118.
Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities,
Luxembourg.
10.
FentonS.J.HansenK.W.MeyersR.L., 2004. CT scan and the paediatric trauma
patient — are we overdoing it?. J. Pediatr. Surg.
39, 1877–1881.
11.
ForstedD.H.KalbhenC.L., 2001. CT of pregnant women for urinary
tract calculi, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute appendicitis.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 178,
1285–1286.
12.
FrushD.P.SodenB.FrushK.S., 2002. Improved paediatric multi-detector
body CT using a size-based color-coded format. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 178,
721–726.
13.
GraserA.WinterspergerB.SuessC. (in press). Dose reduction and image quality
assessment in multi-detector row CT colonography by x-, y-, z-axis tube current
modulation. Am. J. Roentgenol.
14.
GreessH.NomayrA.WolfH., 2002. Dose reduction in CT examination
of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE
Dose). Eur. Radiol. 12,
1571–1576.
15.
GreessH.LutzeJ.NomayrA., 2004. Dose reduction in subsecond
multi-slice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current
modulation. Eur. Radiol. 14,
995–999.
16.
HadleyJ.L.AgolaJ.WongP., 2006. Potential impact of the American
College of Radiology appropriateness criteria on CT for trauma.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 186,
937–942.
17.
HeyerC.M.LemburgS.P.KagelT., 2005. Evaluation of chronic infectious
interstitial pulmonary disease in children by low-dose CT-guided trans-thoracic
lung biopsy. Eur. Radiol. 15,
289–295.
18.
HollingsworthC.FrushD.P.CrossM., 2002. Helical CT of the body: A survey
of techniques used for paediatric patients. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 180,
401–406.
19.
HonnefD.WildbergerJ.E.StargardtA., 2004. Multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in
paediatric radiology: Dose reduction for chest and abdomen
examinations. Roe. Fo. 176,
1021–1030.
20.
HurwitzL.M.YoshizumiT.ReimanR.E., 2006. Radiation dose to the fetus from
body MDCT during early gestation. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 186,
871–876.
21.
IannacconeR.LaghiA.CatalanoC., 2003. Detection of colorectal lesions:
Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional
colonoscopy. Radiology229, 775–781.
22.
ICRP, 2000a. Managing
patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87, Ann. ICRP
30(4).
23.
IkuraH.ShimizuK.IkezoeJ., 2004. In vitro evaluation of normal and
abnormal lungs with ultra-high-resolution CT. J. Thoracic
Imaging. 19,
8–15.
24.
JakobsT.F.BeckerC.R.OhnesorgeB., 2002. Multi-slice helical CT of the
heart with retrospective ECG gating: Reduction of radiation exposure by
ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur.
Radiol. 12,
1081–1086.
25.
JimenezS.JimenezJ.R.CrespoM., 2006. Computed tomography in children
with cystic fibrosis: a new way to reduce radiation dose.
Arch. Dis. Child. 91,
388–390.
26.
JungK.J.LeeK.S.KimS.Y., 2000. Low-dose, volumetric helical CT:
Image quality, radiation dose, and usefulness for evaluation of
bronchiectasis. Invest. Radiol.
35, 557–563.
27.
JungB.MahnkenA.H.StargardtA., 2003. Individually weight-adapted
examination protocol in retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the
heart. Eur. Radiol. 13,
2560–2566.
28.
KalraM.K.MaherM.M.TothT.L., 2004d. Techniques and applications of
automatic tube current modulation for CT.
Radiology233, 649–657.
29.
KalraM.K.MaherM.M.D'SouzaR.V., 2005a. Detection of urinary tract stones
at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: Phantom
and clinical studies. Radiology235, 523–529.
30.
KalraM.K.RizzoS.M.NovellineR.A., 2005c. Reducing radiation dose in
emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control
techniques. Emerg. Radiol. 11,
267–274.
31.
KatzS.I.SalujaS.BrinkJ.A., 2006. Radiation dose associated with
unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: Impact of repetitive
studies. Am. J. Roentgenol. 186,
1120–1124.
32.
KlunerC.HeinP.A.GrallaO., 2006. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a
radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral
calculi?. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.
30, 44–50.
33.
KortesniemiM.KiljunenT.KangasmakiA., 2006. Radiation exposure in body
computed tomography examinations of trauma patients. Phys.
Med. Biol. 51,
3269–3282.
34.
LeaderJ.K.WarfelT.E.FuhrmanC.R., 2005. Pulmonary nodule detection with
low-dose CT of the lung: Agreement among radiologists. Am.
J. Roentgenol. 185,
973–978.
35.
LeeC.I.HaimsA.H.MonicoE.P., 2004. Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of
patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible
risks. Radiology231, 393–398.
36.
LeeC.I.FlasterH.V.HaimsA.H., 2006. Diagnostic CT scans: Institutional
informed consent guidelines and practices at academic medical
centers. Am. J. Roentgenol. 187,
282–287.
37.
McCaigL.F.BurtC.W., 2004. National Hospital ambulatory
medical care survey: 2002 Emergency department summary.
Adv. Data., 29–34.
38.
MichelJ.L.ReynierC.AvyG., 2001. An assessment of low-dose high
resolution CT in the detection of benign asbestos-related pleural
abnormalities. J. Radiol. 82,
922–923.
39.
MiyazakiO.KitamuraM.MasakiH., 2005. Current practice of paediatric
MDCT in Japan: Survey results of demographics and age-based dose
reduction. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi.
65, 216–223.
40.
MossM.McLeanD., 2006. Paediatric and adult computed
tomography practice and patient dose in Australia.
Australas. Radiol. 50,
33–40.
41.
MulkensT.H.BellinckP.BaeyaertM., 2005. Use of an automatic exposure
control mechanism for dose optimisation in multi-detector row CT examinations:
clinical evaluation. Radiology237, 213–223.
42.
PicozziG.PaciE.Lopez PegnaA., 2005. Screening of lung cancer with low
dose spiral CT: Results of a three-year pilot study and design of the randomised
controlled trial “Italung-CT”. Radiol. Med.
109, 17–26,
Torino.
43.
PrasadS.R.WittramC.ShepardJ.A., 2002. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose
chest CT: Comparing the effect on image quality. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 179,
461–465.
44.
PtakT.RheaJ.T.NovellineR.A., 2003. Radiation dose is reduced with a
single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a
conventional segmented method: Initial experience.
Radiology229, 902–905.
45.
RavenelJ.G.ScalzettiE.M.HudaW., 2001. Radiation exposure and image
quality in chest CT examinations. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 177,
279–284.
46.
RCR, 2003. Making the Best
Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology: Guidelines for Doctors. Ref. no.
RCR(03)3, fifth ed.The Royal College of Radiologists,
London.
47.
RCR, 2006. Recommendations
for Cross-Sectional Imaging in Cancer Management. Ref. no. RCR(06)1,
second ed.The Royal College of Radiologists,
London.
ShemeshJ.EvronR.Koren-MoragN., 2005. Coronary artery calcium
measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: Comparison between
55 and 165 mAs. Radiology236, 810–814.
50.
SiegelM.J.SchmidtB.BradleyD., 2004. Radiation dose and image quality
in paediatric CT: Effect of technical factors and phantom size and
shape. Radiology233, 515–522.
51.
Sigal-CinqualbreA.B.HennequinR.AbadaH.T., 2004. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row
chest CT in adults: Feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine
dose. Radiology231, 169–174.
52.
StuhlfautJ.W.LuceyB.C.VargheseJ.C., 2006. Blunt abdominal trauma: Utility of
5-minute delayed CT with a reduced radiation dose.
Radiology238, 473–479.
53.
ThomasK.E.Parnell-ParmleyJ.E.HaidarS., 2006. Assessment of radiation dose
awareness among paediatricians. Pediatr. Radiol.
36, 823–832.
54.
USPAC, 1997. US President's
Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care
Industry, Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. Report to the
President of the United States (http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/cborr/).
VogtC.CohnenM.BeckA., 2004. Detection of colorectal polyps by
multi-slice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with
high-resolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest.
Endosc. 60,
201–209.
57.
WagnerL.K.HudaW., 2004. When a pregnant woman with
suspected appendicitis is referred for a CT scan, what should a radiologist do to
minimise potential radiation risks?. Pediatr.
Radiol. 34,
589–590.
58.
WendelF.JenettM.GeibA., 2005. Low-dose CT in neutropenic
patients with fever of unknown origin. Roe. Fo.
177, 1424–1429.
59.
WormannsD.LudwigK.BeyerF., 2005. Detection of pulmonary nodules at
multi-detector row CT: Effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at
standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur. Radiol.
15, 14–22.
60.
YiC.A.LeeK.S.KimT.S., 2003. Multidetector CT of
bronchiectasis: Effect of radiation dose on image quality.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 181,
501–505.
61.
ZaporozhanJ.LeyS.WeinheimerO., 2006. Multi-detector CT of the chest:
Influence of dose onto quantitative evaluation of severe emphysema: A simulation
study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.
30, 460–468.
BooneJ.M., 2007. The trouble with
CTDI100. Med. Phys. 34,
1364–1371.
64.
BrennerD.J.McColloughC.H.ColinG.O., 2006. It is time to retire the computed
tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose
optimisation. Med. Phys. 33,
1189–1191.
65.
DixonR.L., 2006. Restructuring CT dosimetry — A
realistic strategy for the future. Requiem for the pencil chamber.
Med. Phys. 33,
3973–3976.
66.
EC, 2000a. European
Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed
tomography, Report EUR 16262 EN. Office for Official
Publications of the European Communities,
Luxembourg.
67.
FDA, 1984. Diagnostic x-ray
systems and their major components. United States FDA Code of Federal
Regulations, 21 CFR 1020.33, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, US
Govt. Printing Office, Washington
DC.
68.
ICRP, 1991. 1990
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Ann. ICRP21(1–3).
69.
ICRU, 2006. Patient
dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging, ICRU Report 74.
International Commission on Radiation Units and
Measurements, Bethesda, MD,
USA.
70.
IEC, 2002. Medical
Electrical Equipment. Part 2–44: Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray
equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601-2-44. Ed.
2.1. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Central
Office, Geneva,
Switzerland.
71.
JonesD.G.ShrimptonP.C., 1993. Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed
tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques, NRPB-SR250, Chilton,
UK.
72.
JuciusR.A.KambicG.X., 1977. Radiation dosimetry in computed
tomography. Application of optical instrumentation in medicine, Part
VI. Proceedings of the Society of Photo Optical
Instrumentation in Engineering127, 286–295.
73.
KalenderW.A.SchmidtB.ZanklM., 1999a. A PC program for estimating organ
dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.
Eur. Radiol. 9 (3),
555–562.
PavlicekW.HortonJ.TurcoR., 1979. Evaluation of the MDH Industries,
Inc. pencil chamber for direct beam CT measurements.
Health Phys. 37,
773–774.
76.
RCR, 2003. Making the Best
Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology: Guidelines for Doctors. Ref. no.
RCR(03)3, fifth ed.The Royal College of Radiologists,
London.
77.
ShopeT.B.GagneR.M.JohnsonG.C., 1981. A method for describing the doses
delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med.
Phys. 8,
488–495.
78.
ShrimptonP.C.HillierM.C.LewisM.A., 2005. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT)
Examinations in the UK — 2003 Review. NRPB-W67. National
Radiological Protection Board,
Oxon.
79.
ShrimptonP.C.HillierM.C.LewisM.A., 2006. National survey of doses in the
UK: 2003. Br. J. Radiol. 79
(948), 968–980.
80.
StammG.NagelH.D., 2002. CT-expo — a novel program for dose
evaluation in CT. RöFo174, 1570–1576,
German.
81.
ZanklM.PanzerW.DrexlerG., 1991. The calculation of dose from external
photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods.
Part VI: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91, GSF —
Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Institut für
Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg,
Germany.
82.
ZanklM.PanzerW.DrexlerG., 1993. Tomographic anthropomorphic models. Part
II: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations in paediatric
radiology. GSF-Bericht 30/93, GSF — Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und
Gesundheit, Institut für Strahlenschutz,
Neuherberg, Germany.
83.
ZanklM.WittmannA., 2001. The adult male voxel model ‘Golem’
segmented from whole-body CT patient data. Radiat.
Environ. Biophys. 40,
153–162.