Chapter 2

ACR (American College of Radiology), 2000. ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2000. Radiology 215 Suppl., 1–1511.

Aldrich J.E. Chang S.D. Bilawich A.M. Mayo J.R. , 2006. Radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography: the role of patient size and the selection of tube current. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 57, 152–158.

BEIR, NAS, 2006. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionising radiations. BEIR VII Report. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Bongartz G. Golding S.J. Jurik A.G. , 2004. European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. European Commission. (also available at http://www.msct.eu/CT_Quality_Criteria.htm#Download%20the%202004%20CT%20Quality%20Criteria).

Brenner D. Elliston C. Hall E. , 2001. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 289–296.

Brix G. Nagel H.D. Stamm G. , 2003. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: Results of a nationwide survey. Eur. Radiol. 13, 1979–1991.

Dawson P. , 2004. Patient dose in multi-slice CT: Why is it increasing and does it matter? Br. J. Radiol. 77, S10–S13.

EC, 2000a. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, Report EUR 16262 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Giacomuzzi S.M. Torbica P. Rieger M. , 2001. Radiation exposure in single-slice and multi-slice spiral CT (a phantom study). Roe. Fo. 173, 643–649, German.

Huda W. Mergo P.J. , 2001. How will the introduction of multi-slice CT affect patient doses? In: Radiological Protection of Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy. Proceedings of an International Conference held in Malaga, Spain. March 26–30, 2001. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

IAEA (in press). Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence. IAEA-TECDOC-XXXX, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

ICRP, 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21(1–3).

ICRP, 2000a. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87, Ann. ICRP 30(4).

ICRP, 2000b. Avoidance of radiation injuries from interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85, Ann. ICRP 30(2).

ICRU, 2006. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging, ICRU Report 74. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA.

IEC, 2002. Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2–44: Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601-2-44. Ed. 2.1. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Central Office, Geneva, Switzerland.

Imanishi Y. Fukui A. Niimi H. , 2005. Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA. Eur. Radiol. 15, 41–46.

Kalra M.K. Maher M.M. Toth T.L. , 2004b. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimisation. Radiology 230, 619–628.

Lewis M.A. Edyvean S. , 2005. Patient dose reduction in CT. Br. J. Radiol. 27, 880–883.

McCollough C.H. Zink F.E. , 1999. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med. Phys. 26, 2223–2230.

McCollough C.H. Bruesewitz M.R. Kofler J.M. Jr. , 2006. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options. Radiographics 26, 503–512.

Nagel H.D. , 2002. Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography. Fundamentals, Influencing Parameters, Dose Assessment, Optimisation, Scanner Data Terminology. 4th revised and updated edition. CTB Publications, Hamburg.

Origgi D. Vigorito S. Villa G. , 2006. Survey of computed tomography techniques and absorbed dose in Italian hospitals: A comparison between two methods to estimate the dose—length product and the effective dose and to verify fulfilment of the diagnostic reference levels. Eur. Radiol. 16, 227–237.

Papadimitriou D. Perris A. Manetou A. , 2003. A survey of 14 computed tomography scanners in Greece and 32 scanners in Italy. Examination frequencies, dose reference values, effective doses and doses to organs. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 104, 47–53.

Paterson A. Frush D.P. Donnelly L.F. , 2001. Helical CT of the body: Are settings adjusted for paediatric patients?. Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 297–301.

Prokop M. , 2003. General principles of MDCT. Eur. J. Radiol. 45 (Suppl. 1), S4–S10.

RCR, 2003. Making the Best Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology: Guidelines for Doctors. Ref. no. RCR(03)3. Fifth Edition. The Royal College of Radiologists, London.

Rehani M.M. Ortiz López P. , 2006. Radiation effects in fluoroscopically guided cardiac interventions — keeping them under control (Editorial). Int. J. Cardiol. 109, 147–151.

Rogers L.F. , 2001. Taking care of children. Check out the parameters used for helical CT (Editorial). Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 287.

Shrimpton P.C. Jones D.G. Hillier M.C. , 1991. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2: Dosimetric Aspects. NRPB-R249, National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon.

Shrimpton P.C. Hillier M.C. Lewis M.A. , 2005. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK — 2003 Review. NRPB-W67. National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon.

Tsapaki V. Kottou S. Papadimitriou D. , 2001. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. Br. J. Radiol. 74, 836–840.

Tsapaki V. Aldrich J.E. Sharma R. , 2006. Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: Diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT — IAEA Coordinated Research Project. Radiology 240, 828–834.

Yates S.J. Pike L.C. Goldstone K.E. , 2004. Effect of multi-slice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. Br. J. Radiol. 77, 472–478.