StolicS.MitchellM.WollinJ.Nurse-led telephone interventions for people with cardiac disease: a review of the research literatureEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing92010203–217
2.
RedfernJ.BriffaT.EllisE.FreedmanS.Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: one year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trialHeart952009468–475
3.
BoutronI.MoherD.AltmanD.SchulzK.RavaudP.For the CONSORT group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaborationAnn Intern Med1482008295–309
4.
NeubeckL.RedfernJ.FernandezR.BriffaT.BaumanA.FreedmanS.B.Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic reviewEur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil162009281–289
5.
ClarkA.M.HartlingL.VandermeerB.LisselS.L.McAlisterF.A.Secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease: a meta-regression showing the merits of shorter, generalist, primary care-based interventionsEur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil142007538–546
6.
ClarkA.M.HartlingL.VandermeerB.McAlisterF.A.Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery diseaseAnn Intern Med1432005659–672
7.
GlasgowR.EmmonsK.How can we increase the translation of research into practice: types of evidence neededAnnu Rev Public Health282007413–433