Recommendations for the Management of the Incidental Renal Mass in Adults: Endorsement and Adaptation of the 2017 ACR Incidental Findings Committee White Paper by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berland

L.L.

Silverman

S.G.

Gore

R.M.

Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee

J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7:754–773.

Herts

B.R.

Silverman

S.G.

Hindman

N.M.

Management of the incidental renal mass on CT: a white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee

J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:264–273.

Guethmundsson

Hellborg

Lundstam

Erikson

Ljungberg

Swedish Kidney Cancer Quality Register G

Metastatic potential in renal cell carcinomas </=7 cm: Swedish Kidney Cancer Quality Register data

Eur Urol 2011; 60:975–982.

Carrim

Z.I.

Murchison

J.T.

The prevalence of simple renal and hepatic cysts detected by spiral computed tomography

Clin Radiol 2003; 58:626–629.

Smaldone

M.C.

Kutikov

Egleston

B.L.

Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis

Cancer 2012; 118:997–1006.

Hindman

N.M.

Approach to very small (< 1.5 cm) cystic renal lesions: ignore, observe, or treat?

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:1182–1189.

Campbell

Uzzo

R.G.

Allaf

M.E.

Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline

J Urol 2017; 198:520–529.

Israel

G.M.

Bosniak

M.A.

How I do it: evaluating renal masses

Radiology 2005; 236:441–450.

Chung

E.P.

Herts

B.R.

Linnell

Analysis of changes in attenuation of proven renal cysts on different scanning phases of triphasic MDCT

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:405–410.

10.

Silverman

S.G.

Israel

G.M.

Herts

B.R.

Richie

J.P.

Management of the incidental renal mass

Radiology 2008; 249:16–31.

11.

V.B.

Allen

S.F.

Hood

M.N.

Choyke

P.L.

Renal masses: quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging

Radiology 2002; 224:695–700.

12.

Haramis

Mues

A.C.

Rosales

J.C.

Natural history of renal cortical neoplasms during active surveillance with follow-up longer than 5 years

Urology 2011; 77:787–791.

13.

Graversen

J.A.

Mues

A.C.

Perez-Lanzac de Lorca

Landman

Active surveillance of renal cortical neoplasms: a contemporary review

Postgrad Med 2011; 123:105–113.

14.

O'Connor

S.D.

Pickhardt

P.J.

Kim

D.H.

Oliva

M.R.

Silverman

S.G.

Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:139–145.

15.

Jonisch

A.I.

Rubinowitz

A.N.

Mutalik

P.G.

Israel

G.M.

Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?

Radiology 2007; 243:445–450.

16.

Pooler

B.D.

Pickhardt

P.J.

O'Connor

S.D.

Bruce

R.J.

Patel

S.R.

Nakada

S.Y.

Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198:1115–1120.

17.

Schieda

Vakili

Dilauro

Hodgdon

Flood

T.A.

Shabana

W.M.

Solid renal cell carcinoma measuring water attenuation (-10 to 20 HU) on unenhanced CT

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205:1215–1221.

18.

E.M.

Ellis

J.H.

Silverman

S.G.

Cohan

R.H.

Caoili

E.M.

Davenport

M.S.

Expanding the definition of a benign renal cyst on contrast-enhanced CT: can incidental homogeneous renal masses measuring 21-39 HU be safely ignored?

Acad Radiol 2018; 25:209–212.

19.

Siddaiah

Krishna

McInnes

M.D.F.

Is ultrasound useful for further evaluation of homogeneously hyperattenuating renal lesions detected on CT?

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209:604–610.

20.

Israel

G.M.

Hindman

Bosniak

M.A.

Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system

Radiology 2004; 231:365–371.

21.

Dilauro

Quon

McInnes

M.D.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced multiphase renal protocol CT versus MRI for diagnosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206:319–325.

22.

Bosniak

M.A.

Megibow

A.J.

Hulnick

D.H.

Horii

Raghavendra

B.N.

CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat

AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151:497–501.

23.

Mucksavage

Ramchandani

Malkowicz

S.B.

Guzzo

T.J.

Is ultrasound imaging inferior to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal mass size?

Urology 2012; 79:28–31.

24.

Mucksavage

Kutikov

Magerfleisch

Comparison of radiographical imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of renal masses: is there a sizeable difference?

BJU Int 2011; 108:E232–E236.

25.

Volpe

Panzarella

Rendon

R.A.

Haider

M.A.

Kondylis

F.I.

Jewett

M.A.

The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses

Cancer 2004; 100:738–745.

26.

Thompson

R.H.

Kurta

J.M.

Kaag

Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases

J Urol 2009; 181:2033–2036.

27.

Hindman

N.M.

Hecht

E.M.

Bosniak

M.A.

Follow-up for Bosniak category 2F cystic renal lesions

Radiology 2014; 272:757–766.

28.

Strotzer

Lehner

K.B.

Becker

Detection of fat in a renal cell carcinoma mimicking angiomyolipoma

Radiology 1993; 188:427–428.

29.

Helenon

Chretien

Paraf

Melki

Denys

Moreau

J.F.

Renal cell carcinoma containing fat: demonstration with CT

Radiology 1993; 188:429–430.

30.

Jinzaki

Silverman

S.G.

Akita

Nagashima

Mikami

Oya

Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management

Abdom Imaging 2014; 39:588–604.

31.

Flum

A.S.

Hamoui

Said

M.A.

Update on the diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma

J Urol 2016; 195:834–846.

32.

Pierorazio

P.M.

Johnson

M.H.

Patel

H.D.

Management of renal masses and localized renal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Urol 2016; 196:989–999.

33.

Chandarana

Godoy

M.C.

Vlahos

Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneurysms–initial observations

Radiology 2008; 249:692–700.

34.

Krishna

Sadoughi

McInnes

M.D.F.

Chatelain

MacDonald

D.B.

Schieda

Attenuation and degree of enhancement with conventional 120-kVp polychromatic CT and 70-keV monochromatic rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT in cystic and solid renal masses

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:789–796.

35.

Kim

Y.K.

Park

B.K.

Kim

C.K.

Park

S.Y.

Adenoma characterization: adrenal protocol with dual-energy CT

Radiology 2013; 267:155–163.

36.

Ascenti

Mazziotti

Mileto

Dual-source dual-energy CT evaluation of complex cystic renal masses

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199:1026–1034.

37.

Wortman

J.R.

Bunch

P.M.

Fulwadhva

U.P.

Bonci

G.A.

Sodickson

A.D.

Dual-energy CT of incidental findings in the abdomen: can we reduce the need for follow-up imaging?

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:W58–W68.

38.

Kaza

R.K.

Ananthakrishnan

Kambadakone

Platt

J.F.

Update of dual-energy CT applications in the genitourinary tract

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208:1185–1192.

39.

Barr

R.G.

Peterson

Hindi

Evaluation of indeterminate renal masses with contrast-enhanced US: a diagnostic performance study

Radiology 2014; 271:133–142.

40.

Atri

Tabatabaeifar

Jang

H.J.

Finelli

Moshonov

Jewett

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced US for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses

Radiology 2015; 276:900–908.

41.

Sevcenco

Spick

Helbich

T.H.

Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur Radiol 2017; 27:2239–2247.