SmithS.L.Medicare RBRVS 2009: The Physicians' Guide2009American Medical AssociationChicago, IL
2.
ParsonsH.What happened at Hawthorne?Science1974; 183:922–932.
3.
WickstromG.BendixT.The “Hawthorne effect”-what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show?Scand J Work Environ Health2000; 26:363–367.
4.
McCarneyR.WarnerJ.IliffeS.The Hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trialBMC Med Res Methodol7200730
5.
FoxN.S.BrennanJ.S.ChasenS.T.Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effectEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2008; 141:111–114.
6.
HsiaoW.C.BraunP.BeckerE.R.ThomasS.R.The resource-based relative value scale: toward the development of an alternative physician payment systemJAMA1987; 258:799–802.
7.
HsiaoW.C.BraunP.DunnD.BeckerE.R.DeNicolaM.KetchamT.R.Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value studyN Engl J Med1988; 319:881–888.
8.
HsiaoW.C.BraunP.DunnD.BeckerE.R.Resource-based relative values: an overviewJAMA1988; 260:2347–2353.
9.
PitmanA.JonesD.N.StuartD.LloydhopeK.MallittK.O'RourkeP.The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) relative value unit workload model, its limitations and the evolution to a safety, quality and performance frameworkJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol2009; 53:450–458.
10.
ConolleyP.M.VernonS.W.Productivity of radiologists: estimates based on analysis of relative value unitsAJR Am J Roentgenol1991; 157:1337–1340.
11.
DoraJ.M.TorresF.S.GerchmanM.FogliattoF.S.Development of a local relative value unit to measure radiologists' computed tomography reporting workloadJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol2016; 60:714–719.
12.
DuszakR.Jr.MuroffL.R.Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarksJ Am Coll Radiol2010; 7:452–458.
13.
DuszakR.Jr.MuroffL.R.Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 2: beyond the clinical numbersJ Am Coll Radiol2010; 7:482–489.
