MahgereftehS.KruskalJ.B.YamC.S.BlacharA.SosnaJ.Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the futureRadiographics2009; 29:1221–1231.
3.
KruskalJ.B.EisenbergR.L.BrookO.SiewertB.Transitioning from peer review to peer learning for abdominal radiologistsAbdom Radiol2016; 41:416–428.
4.
EisenbergR.L.Peer review: a better wayAcad Radiol2016; 23:1071–1072.
5.
BorgstedeJ.P.LewisR.S.BhargavanM.SunshineJ.H.RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement ratesJ Am Coll Radiol2004; 1:59–65.
6.
JacksonV.P.CushingT.AbujudehH.H.RADPEER scoring white paperJ Am Coll Radiol2009; 6:21–25.
7.
BrunoM.A.WalkerE.A.AbujudehH.H.Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reductionRadiographics2015; 35:1668–1676.
8.
BenderL.C.LinnauK.F.MeierE.N.AnzaiY.GunnM.L.Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer systemAJR Am J Roentgenol2012; 199:1320–1327.
9.
VermaN.HippeD.S.RobinsonJ.D.Journal club: Assessment of interobserver variability in the peer review process: should we agree to disagree?AJR Am J Roentgenol2016; 207:1215–1222.
10.
MucciB.MurrayH.DownieA.OsborneK.Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepanciesBr J Radiol86201320130245
11.
WuM.Z.McInnesM.D.F.MacdonaldD.B.KielarA.Z.DuigenanS.CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy ratesRadiology2014; 270:717–735.
12.
EisenbergR.L.CunninghamM.L.SiewertB.KruskalJ.B.Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review systemJ Am Coll Radiol2014; 11:397–401.
13.
LoretoM.KahnD.GlancP.Survey of radiologist attitudes and perceptions regarding the incorporation of a departmental peer review systemJ Am Coll Radiol2014; 11:1034–1037.
14.
AbujudehH.PyattR.S.Jr.BrunoM.A.RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forwardJ Am Coll Radiol2014; 11:899–904.
15.
OwensE.J.TaylorN.R.HowlettD.C.Perceptual type error in everyday practiceClin Radiol2016; 71:593–601.
16.
The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for Learning from Discrepancy Meetings. London: The Royal College of Radiologists, 2014.
17.
HussainS.HussainJ.S.KaramA.VijayaraghavanG.Focused peer review: the end game of peer reviewJ Am Coll Radiol2012; 9:430–433e1.
18.
BrookO.R.RomeroJ.BrookA.KruskalJ.B.YamC.S.LevineD.The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collectionRadiology2015; 274:221–229.