Canadian Association of Radiologists Radiation Protection Working Group: Review of Radiation Units and the Use of Computed Tomography Dose Indicators in Canada

International Commission on Radiological Protection The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 Pergamon Press Oxford, UK

Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Phase 2 2006 National Research Council Washington DC

Radiation Protection in Radiology—Large Facilities, Safety Code 35. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada, Ministry of Health; 2008.

Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Vol. 1 2008 UNSCEAR United Nations Office at Vienna, Austria

Thakur Y. Hammerstrom K. Bjarnason T.A. A survey of patient dose in cr examinations across Vancouver Coastal Health Region J Digit Imaging 2012; 25:189–195.

Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP, Publication 1 1959 Pergamon Press Oxford, UK

Geleijns J. Wondergem J. X-ray imaging and the skin: radiation biology, patient dosimetry and observed effects Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 114:121–125.

Cherry S.R. Sorenson J.A. Phelps M.P. Physics in Nuclear Medicine 3rd ed. 2003 Elsevier Philadelphia, PA

Jones D.G. Shrimpton P.C. Survey of CT Practice in the UK. Part Normalised Organ Doses Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques. NRPB-R250 1991 National Radiological Protection Board Chilton, UK

Hurwitz L.M. Yoshizumi T.T. Goodman P.C. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal exide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31:544–549.

Ngutter L.K. Kofler J.M. McCollough C.H. Update on patient radiation doses at a large tertiary care medical center Health Physics 2001; 81:530–535.

Huda W. Ogden K.M. Khorasani M.R. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT Radiology 2008; 248:995–1003.

Shrimpton P.C. Assessment of patient dose in CT. National Radiation Protection Board. NRPB-PE/1/2004 2004 National Radiological Protection Board Chilton, England

Deak P.D. Smal Y. Kalendar W.A. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product Radiology 2010; 257:158–166.

Shrimpton P.C. Hillier M.C. Lewis M.A. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003 Br J Radiol 2006; 79:968–980.

Tsapaki V. Aldrich J.E. Sharma R. Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT—IAEA-coordinated research project Radiology 2006; 240:828–834.

Muhogora W.E. Ahmed N.A. Beganovic A. Patient doses in CT examinations in 18 countries: initial results from international atomic energy agency projects Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009; 136:118–126.

European Guidelines on Quality Criteria For Computed Tomography. Report EUR 16262: Brussels, Belgiuim; 1999.

Aldrich J.E. Bilawitch A. Mayo J.R. Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia Can Assoc Radiol J 2004; 57:79–85.

Association des physiciens et ingénieurs biomédicaux du Québec. Etude des doses en tomodensitométrie. Montreal, QC: Association des physiciens et ingénieurs biomédicaux du Québec; 2008.