SigstedtB.LunderquistA.Complications of angiographic examinationsAJR Am J Roentengol1978; 130:455–460.
2.
JuranN.B.SmithD.D.RouseC.L.Survey of current practice patterns for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. SANDBAG Nursing CoordinatorsAm J Crit Care1996; 5:442–448.
3.
SemlerH.J.Transfemoral catheterization mechanical versus manual control of bleedingRadiology1985; 154:234–235.
4.
BogartM.Time to haemostasis a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral arteryAm J Crit Care1995; 4:149–156.
5.
SimonA.BumgarnerB.ClarkK.Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery: haemostasis after cardiac catheterisationAm J Crit Care1998; 7:308–313.
6.
JonesT.McCutcheonH.Effectiveness of mechanical compression devices in attaining haemostasis after femoral sheath removalAm J Crit Care2002; 11:155–162.
7.
JonesC.HolcombE.RohrerT.Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after invasive proceduresCrit Care Nurse1995; 15:47–51.
8.
SridharK.FischmanD.GoldbergS.Peripheral vascular complications after intracoronary stent placement: prevention by use of a pneumatic vascular compression deviceCathet Cardiovasc Diagn1996; 39:224–229.
DauermanH.L.ApplegateR.J.CohenD.J.Vascular closure devices: the second decadeJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 50:1617–1626.
11.
DoyleB.J.KonzB.A.LennonR.J.Ambulation one hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization; a prospective study of 1009 proceduresMayo Clin Proc2006; 81:1537–1540.
12.
KorenyM.RiedmüllerE.NikfardjamM.Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysisJAMA2004; 291:350–357.
13.
SohailM.R.KhanA.H.HolmesD.R.Infectious complications of percutaneous vascular closure devicesMayo Clin Proc2005; 80:1011–1015.
