GreenD.ParkerD.CTA and MRA: visualization without catheterizationSemin Ultrasound CT MR2003; 24:185–191.
2.
GoldmanJ.P.New techniques and applications for magnetic resonance angiographyMt Sinai J Med2003; 70:375–385.
3.
RoweV.L.TuckerS.W.Jr.Advances in vascular imagingSurg Clin North Am2004; 84:1189–1202 v
4.
WedeenV.J.MeuliR.A.EdelmanR.R.Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonanceScience1985; 230:946–948.
5.
LeinerT.Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculatureTop Magn Reson Imaging2005; 16:21–66.
6.
KorosecF.R.FrayneR.GristT.M.Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiographyMagn Reson Med1996; 36:345–351.
7.
SwanJ.S.CarrollT.J.KennellT.W.Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vesselsRadiology2002; 225:43–52.
8.
AyusoJ.R.de CaraltT.M.PagesM.MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprosthesesJ Magn Reson Imaging2004; 20:803–810.
9.
PoitevinL.A.Thoraco-cervico-brachial confined spaces an anatomic studyAnn Chir Main1988; 7:5–13.
10.
DemondionX.BacquevilleE.PaulC.Thoracic outlet: assessment with MR imaging in asymptomatic and symptomatic populationsRadiology2003; 227:461–468.
11.
HagspielK.D.SpinosaD.J.AngleJ.F.Diagnosis of vascular compression at the thoracic outlet using gadolinium-enhanced high-resolution ultrafast MR angiography in abduction and adductionCardiovasc Intervent Radiol2000; 23:152–154.
12.
DymarkowskiS.BosmansH.MarchalG.Three-dimensional MR angiography in the evaluation of thoracic outlet syndromeAJR Am J Roentgenol1999; 173:1005–1008.
13.
LangE.Arteriography of thoracic outlet syndromeBaumS.Abrams angiography: vascular and interventional radiology1997Little, Brown Medical DivisionBoston (MA)9951010.
CharonJ.P.MilneW.SheppardD.G.Evaluation of MR angiographic technique in the assessment of thoracic outlet syndromeClin Radiol2004; 59:588–595.
16.
OuwendijkR.de VriesM.PattynamaP.M.Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiographyRadiology2005; 236:1094–1103.
17.
NelemansP.J.LeinerT.de VetH.C.Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiographyRadiology2000; 217:105–114.
18.
PortugallerH.R.SchoellnastH.HauseggerK.A.Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing?Eur Radiol2004; 14:1681–1687.
19.
LeinerT.KesselsA.G.NelemansP.J.Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosisRadiology2005; 235:699–708.
20.
GoldblattH.LynchJ.HanzalR.F.Studies on experimental hypertension: I. The production of persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemiaJ Exp Med1934; 59:347–379.
LeinerT.de HaanM.W.NelemansP.J.Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosisEur Radiol2005; 15:2219–2229.
23.
ZhangH.PrinceM.R.Renal MR angiographyMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2004; 12:487–503 vi
24.
VasbinderG.B.NelemansP.J.KesselsA.G.Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysisAnn Intern Med2001; 135:401–411.
25.
BalzerJ.O.LoeweC.DavisK.Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast materialEur Radiol2003; 13:2067–2074.
26.
SchoenbergS.O.RiegerJ.WeberC.H.High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and USRadiology2005; 235:687–698.
27.
PrinceM.R.MeaneyJ.F.Expanding role of MR angiography in clinical practiceEur Radiol16Suppl 22006B3–B8.
28.
TombachB.BremerC.ReimerP.Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized studyRadiology2001; 218:651–657.
29.
DongQ.SchoenbergS.O.CarlosR.C.Diagnosis of renal vascular disease with MR angiographyRadiographics1999; 19:1535–1554.
30.
GrenierN.BasseauF.RiesM.Functional MRI of the kidneyAbdom Imaging2003; 28:164–175.
31.
ZhangH.L.SchoenbergS.O.ResnickL.M.Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: combining gadolinimum-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with functional magnetic resonance pulse sequencesAm J Hypertens2003; 16:1079–1082.
32.
BlumU.KrummeB.FlugelP.Treatment of ostial renal-artery stenoses with vascular endoprostheses after unsuccessful balloon angioplastyN Engl J Med1997; 336:459–465.
ChuterT.A.ParodiJ.C.Lawrence-BrownM.Management of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a decade of progressJ Endovasc Ther11Suppl 22004II82–II95.
35.
MayJ.WhiteG.H.YuW.Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table methodJ Vasc Surg1998; 27:213–220 discussion 220–1
36.
BlumU.LangerM.SpillnerG.Abdominal aortic aneurysms: preliminary technical and clinical results with transfemoral placement of endovascular self-expanding stent-graftsRadiology1996; 198:25–31.
37.
BecqueminJ.P.AllaireE.DesgrangesP.Delayed complications following EVARTech Vasc Interv Radiol2005; 8:30–40.
38.
HellingerJ.C.Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and postprocedural imagingTech Vasc Interv Radiol2005; 8:2–15.
39.
ThurnherS.A.DorffnerR.ThurnherM.M.Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiographyRadiology1997; 205:341–352.
40.
EngellauL.AlbrechtssonU.DahlstromN.Measurements before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MR imaging with MRA vs. angiography and CTActa Radiol2003; 44:177–184.
41.
LutzA.M.WillmannJ.K.PfammatterT.Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software toolJ Vasc Surg2003; 37:619–627.
42.
WickyS.FanC.M.GellerS.C.MR angiography of endoleak with inconclusive concomitant CT angiographyAJR Am J Roentgenol2003; 181:736–738.
43.
HaulonS.LionsC.McFaddenE.P.Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysmsEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2001; 22:62–69.
44.
TombachB.HeindelW.Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrolEur Radiol2002; 12:1550–1556.
45.
HiattM.D.RubinG.D.Surveillance for endoleaks: how to detect all of themSemin Vasc Surg2004; 17:268–278.
46.
ThomsenH.S.Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamideEur Radiol2006; 16:2619–2621.
47.
ThomsenH.S.MarckmannP.LogagerV.B.Enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: a choice between contrast medium-induced nephropathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?Acta Radiol2007; 48:593–596.
48.
KanalE.BroomeD.R.MartinD.R.Response to the FDA's May 23, 2007, Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis updateRadiology2008; 246:11–14.
49.
CollidgeT.A.ThomsonP.C.MarkP.B.Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: retrospective study of a renal replacement therapy cohortRadiology2007; 245:68–75.
50.
BroomeD.R.GirguisM.S.BaronP.W.Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concernedAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 188:86–92.
