Abstract
Introduction:
Unnecessary laboratory utilization due to inappropriate test-ordering behaviour among hospital clinicians and community general practitioners is an ongoing problem in many hospitals and primary care trusts throughout the UK and abroad. In January 2007, our hospital removed the ‘tick box’ for PSA from its laboratory tests request form, in a managed way, with the intention of reducing unnecessary requests for this test. Here we address the impact this action had on the number of PSA tests being requested and its downstream effects on prostate cancer diagnosis.
Methods:
Using our laboratory database we compared the number of hospital and local GP requests for PSA, before and after modification of our laboratory form (requests from 2004 to 2006 were compared to 2007). We then correlated this data with the number of fast-track target referrals (2 week wait) from primary care for suspected prostate cancer, the results of prostate biopsies, and the number of prostate cancers being diagnosed, over the same time period.
Results:
Mann—Whitney non-parametric testing demonstrated a 17% reduction in the median number of PSA requests since the change was introduced (
Conclusions:
Our study shows that with this simple modification to the design of our laboratory request form, whereby the doctor must make an active written decision to order a PSA test, there was a significant reduction in the number of PSA requests, both in the hospital and in the community, without patient safety being compromised as measured by maintaining the number of fast-track target referrals for suspected prostate cancer and the number of prostate cancers diagnosed.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
