Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This qualitative study explores ethical luxury in Taiwan, a country that represents a significant demographic in the luxury market. The study utilized the ZMET technique and focus groups. A total of 28 heavy users of luxury brands were interviewed. Results indicate that luxury brands are chiefly defined by such constructs as price, quality and aesthetical attributes, whereas ethicality is centrally demarcated by human wellbeing, the environment and animal welfare, amongst other elements. The fusion of these two concepts implies several encouraging outlooks and certain deterring factors. Results denote that there is potential for ethical luxury's inception in the Taiwanese market, but with considerable forethought in the process. This study extends the body of knowledge in how consumers perceive the prospect of ethical luxury, especially from a non-western perspective.

Keywords

Consumers’ perceptions Ethical luxury Ethical consumption Luxury marketing ZMET Taiwan

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achabou

M.A.

, & Dekhili

(2013). Luxury and sustainable development: iIs there a match?J. Bus. Res., 66(10), 1896–1903.Luxury and sustainable development: is there a match?

Ahuvia

, & Wong

(1998). The effect of cultural orientation in luxury consumption. Adv. Consum. Res., 25(1), 29–32.

Alexander

, & Nicholls

(2006). Rediscovering consumer-producer involvement: a network perspective on fair trade marketing. Eur. J. Mark., 40(11/12), 1236–1253.

Anaya

, 2010. In ethical Fashion, Desirability is Sustainability. Available from:http://www.businessoffashion.com/2010/07/in-ethical-fashion-desirabilityissustainability.html (accessed 24 May 2014).

Arnould

E.J.

and Price

L.L.

(2006). Market-oriented ethnography revisited. J. Advert. Res., 46(3), 251–262.

Atwal

, & Williams

(2009). Luxury brand marketing–the experience is everything! J. Brand Manag., 16(5), 338–346.

Bain & Company, 2018. The Personal Luxury Goods Market Delivers Positive Growth in 2018 to Reach €260 Billion – A Trend That is Expected to Continue Through 2025. Available from:https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/2018/fall-luxury-goods-market-study/(accessed 10 April 2019).

Bendell

, Kleanthous

, 2007. Deeper Luxury: Quality and Style When the World Matters. Available from:http://www.wwf.org.uk/deeperluxury/report.html(accessed 24 May 2014).

Biernacki

, & Waldorf

(1981). Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol. Methods Res., 10(2), 141–163.

10.

Block

(2010). Rejoinder to Davidson on counterfeiting. Am. J. Econ. Sociol., 69(4), 1328–1331.

11.

Boeije

(2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual. Quant., 36(4), 391–409.

12.

Bray

, Johns

, & Kilburn

(2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. J. Bus. Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

13.

Carrigan

, Moraes

, McEachern

(2013). From conspicuous to considered fashion: A harm-chain approach to the responsibilities of luxury-fashion businesses. J. Mark. Manag., 29(11-12), 1277–1307.

14.

Cervellon

M.C.

(2013). Conspicuous conservation: using semiotics to understand sustainable luxury. Int. J. Mark. Res., 55(5), 695–717.

15.

Cervellon

, & Shammas

(2013). The value of sustainable luxury in mature markets. J. Corp. Citizensh., 52, 90–101.

16.

Chang

H.H.

(2004). Fake logos, fake theory, fake globalization. Inter-Asia Cult. Stud., 5(2), 222–236.

17.

Chen

, & Wang

(2017). Connecting or disconnecting: luxury branding on social media and affluent Chinese female consumers’ interpretations. J. Brand Manag., 24(6), 562–574.

18.

Christensen

G.L.

& Olson

J.C.

(2002). Mapping consumers’ mental models with ZMET. Psychol. Mark., 19(6), 477–501.

19.

Claudio

(2007). Waste couture: environmental impact of the clothing industry. Environ. Health Perspect., 115(9), 449–454.

20.

Contardo

(2004). Old and new marketing techniques: using images to penetrate the mind of the global consumer. In Proceedings of CMS Conference, July.

21.

Creswell

J.W.

, & Miller

D.L.

(2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract., 39(3), 124–130.

22.

Cristini

, Kauppinen-Raisanen

, Bathod-Prothade

and Woodside

(2017). Toward a general theory of luxury: advancing from workbench definitions and theoretical transformations. J. Bus. Res. 70, 101–107.

23.

Crittenden

V.L.

, Crittenden

W.F.

, Ferrell

L.K.

, Ferrell

O.C.

, & Pinney

C.C.

(2011). Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 39(1), 71–85.

24.

Davies

I.A.

, Lee

, & Ahonkhai

(2012). Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? J. Bus. Ethics, 106(1), 37–51.

25.

De Pelsmacker

, Driesen

, & Rayp

(2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair trade coffee. J. Consum. Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

26.

Doran

, 2014. Gucci Steps Towards Sustainability. Available from:http://luxurysociety.com/articles/2014/01/gucci-steps-towards-sustainability(accessed 21 June 2014).

27.

Doss

& Robinson

(2013). Luxury perceptions: luxury brand vs counterfeit for young us female consumers. J. Fash. Mark. Manag., 17(4), 424–439.

28.

Doulton

, 2011. Luxury Brand CSR: No Longer Just an Option? Available from: http://luxurysociety.com/articles/2011/10/luxury-brand-csr-no-longer-just-an-option (accessed 20 June 2014).

29.

Dubois

, Laurent

, Czellar

, 2001. Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes. No. 736, HEC Paris.

30.

Euromonitor. 2014. Luxury Goods in Taiwan: Country Report. Available at:http://www.euromonitor.com/luxury-goods-in-taiwan/report(accessed 30 July 2014).

31.

Guedes

M.D.G.

(2011). Ethical fashion brands: promotion approach or a real value. Proceedings of International Conference Fashion and Communication, CECL, Lisboa, MUDE, 31/3 - 2/4

32.

Hartlieb

, & Jones

(2009). Humanising business through ethical labelling: progress and paradoxes in the UK. J. Bus. Ethics, 88(3), 583–600.

33.

Hauck

W.E.

, & Stanforth

(2007). Cohort perception of luxury goods and services. J. Fash. Mark. Manag., 11(20), 175–188.

34.

Heathcote

, 2012. Marketing Sustainability for the Luxury Fashion Sector. Available from: source.ethicalfashionforum.com/article/marketing-sustainability-for-the-luxury-fashion-sector- (accessed 22 June 2014).

35.

Hennigs

, Wiedmann

K.P.

, Klarmann

, & Behrens

(2013a). Sustainability as part of the luxury essence: delivering value through social and environmental excellence. J. Corp. Citizensh., (52), 25–35.

36.

Hennigs

, Wiedmann

N.K.P.

, Behrens

, Klarmann

S.C.

, & Carduck

(2013b). Brand extensions: a successful strategy in luxury fashion branding? assessing consumers’ implicit associations. J. Fash. Mark. Manag., 17(4), 390–402.

37.

Hilton

, Choi

C.J.

, & Chen

(2004). The ethics of counterfeiting in the fashion industry: quality, credence and profit issues. J. Bus. Ethics, 55(4), 343–352.

38.

Janssen

, Vanhamme

, Lindgreen

, & Lefebvre

(2014). The catch-22 of responsible luxury: effects of luxury product characteristics on consumers’ perception of fit with corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics, 119(1), 45–57.

39.

Janssen

, Vanhamme

, & Leblanc

(2017). Should luxury brands say it out loud? brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury. J. Bus. Res., 77, 167–174.

40.

Jenkin

, 2012. Sustainable Luxury Fashion–Is It Possible? Available from: source.ethicalfashionforum.com/article/sustainable-luxury-fashion-is-it-possible (accessed 4 July 2014).

41.

Jin, A.S. A. (2012). The potential of social media for luxury brand management. Marketing Intelligence Planning, 30(7), 687–699. Jin

A.S.A.

Market. Intell. Plann.

42.

Joy

, Sherry

J.F.

Jr , Venkatesh

, Wang

, & Chan

(2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fash. Theory: J. Dress Body Cult., 16(3), 273–296.

43.

Kapoulas

, Murphy

, Ellis

(2002). Say hello, wave goodbye: missed opportunities for electronic relationship marketing within the financial services sector?. Int. J. Bank Market., 20(7), 302–310.

44.

Kapferer

J.N.

(2010). All that glitters is not green: the challenge of sustainable luxury. Eur. Bus. Rev., (November-December), 40–45.

45.

Kapferer

J.N.

, & Bastien (2009). The specificity of luxury management: turning marketing upside down. Brand Manag., 16(5–6), 311–322. Bastien

46.

Kapferer

J. N.

, Michaut-Denizeau

(2014). Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers’ viewpoint. J. Brand Manag., 21(1), 1–22.

47.

Kapferer

J.N.

, & Michaut

(2015). Luxury and sustainability: a common future? The match depends on how consumers define luxury. Lux. Res. J., 1(1), 3–17.

48.

Kapferer

J.N.

, & Valette-Florence

(2018). The impact of brand penetration and awareness on luxury brand desirability: a cross country analysis of the relevance of the rarity principle. J. Bus. Res., 83, 38–50.

49.

Kapoulas

, & Mitic

(2012). Understanding the challenges of qualitative research: rhetorical issues and reality traps. Qual. Mark. Res.: Int. J., 15(4), 354–368.

50.

Kiewiet

D.J.

, & Vos

J.F.J.

(2007). Organizational sustainability: a case for formulation a tailor-made definition. J. Environ. Assess.t Policy.Manag., 9, 1–18.

51.

Khan

M.E.

, Anker

, Patel

B.C.

, Barge

, Sadhwani

, &Kohle

(1991. The use of focus groups in social and behavioural research: some methodological issues. World Health Stat. Q., 44(3), 145–149.

52.

Kitzinger

, & Barbour

R.S.

(1999). Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. In Barbour

R.S.

& Kitzinger

(Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 1–20). London: Sage.

53.

Kitzinger

(1995). Qualitative research. introducing focus groups. Br. Med. J., 311, 299–302.

54.

Krueger

R.A.

, & Casey

M.A.

(2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

55.

Lee

M.S.

, McGoldrick

P.J.

, Keeling

K.A.

, & Doherty

(2003). Using ZMET to explore barriers to the adoption of 3G mobile banking services. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., 31(6), 340–348.

56.

Moraes

, Carrigan

, Bosangit

, Ferreira

, & McGrath

(2017). Understanding ethical luxury consumption through practice theories: a study of fine jewellery purchases. J. Bus. Ethics, 145(3), 525–543.

57.

Microsoft Advertising. 2009. Lovers of Luxury II: Luxury Consumption in Asia & Europe and the Role of Digital Media. Available from:http://www.webtech.us/research/Lovers%20of%20Luxury%20II.PDF (accessed 29 July 2014).

58.

Nia

, & Zaichkowsky

J.L.

(2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands. J. Product Brand Manag., 9(7), 485–497.

59.

Polsa

(2007). Comparability in cross-cultural qualitative marketing research: equivalence in personal interviews. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 8, 1–18.

60.

Pope

, Ziebland

, & Mays

(2000). Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320, 114–116.

61.

Proctor

R.A.

, 2009. Luxury: An Ethical Debate. Available from:http://luxurysociety.com/articles/2009/01/luxury-an-ethical-debate(accessed 15 June 2014).

62.

Sozanni

, 2012. Does an Ethical Luxury Exist? Available from:http://www.vogue.it/en/magazine/editor-s-blog/2012/11/november-12th(accessed 15 June 2014).

63.

Silverstein

M.J.

, & Fiske

(2003). Luxury for the masses. Harv. Bus. Rev., 81(4), 48–57.

64.

Suri

(2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qual. Res. J., 11(2), 63–75.

65.

Szmigin

and Carrigan

(2005) Exploring the dimensions of ethical consumption. Adv. Consum. Res., 7, 608–613.

66.

Threlfall

K.D.

(1999). Using focus groups as a consumer research tool. J. Mark. Pract.: Appl. Mark. Sci., 5(4), 102–105.

67.

Truong

, McColl

& Kitchen

(2009). New luxury brand positioning and the emergence of masstige brands. J. Brand Manag., 16(5), 375–382.

68.

Voyer

B.G.

, Beckham

(2014). Can sustainability be luxurious? A mixed-method investigation of implicit and explicit attitudes towards sustainable luxury consumption, in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, Cotte

and Wood

(Eds), Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 245–250.

69.

Wen

C.H.

, Liao

S.H.

, Chang

W.L.

, & Hsu

P.Y.

(2012). Mining shopping behavior in the Taiwan luxury products market. Expert Syst. Appl., 39(12), 11257–11268.

70.

Yao

J.T.

(2005). How a luxury monopolist might benefit from a stringent counterfeit monitoring regime. Int. J. Bus. Econ., 4(3), 177–192.

71.

Zaltman

(1997). Rethinking market research: pPutting people back in. J. Mark. Res., 34(4), 424–437.Rethinking market research: putting people back in

Consumers’ Perceptions on Complexity and Prospects of Ethical Luxury: Qualitative Insights from Taiwan

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References