Research quality has become a major issue in the Australian university system and journal quality, as determined by discipline committees, seems likely to play a major role in the government's new assessment system, which will have financial and reputational implications for disciplines and individual academics. The present study examined the Google citations, which are a measure of journal influence, obtained by all of the marketing journals rated as A* and A in the Government's recent journal list, as well as 10 B and 10 C rated journals to see how the journals differ. The implications of the results for Australian marketing academics are discussed.
BakkalbasiN., BauerK., GloverJ., WangL., 2006. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(7). <www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7>.
2.
BaumgartnerH.PietersR.The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas over timeJournal of Marketing6722003123–139
3.
GeunaA.MartinB.University research evaluation and funding: an international comparisonMinerva4142003277–304
4.
EastonG.EastonD.Marketing journals and the research assessment exerciseJournal of Marketing Management191/220035–24
5.
EggheL.Theory and practise of the g-indexScientometrics6912006131–152
6.
GuidryJ.HollierB.JohnsonL.TannerJ.VeltsosC.Surveying the cites: a ranking of marketing journals using citation analysisMarketing Education Review141200445–59
HarzingA.W.van der WalR.Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysisEthics in Science and Environmental Politics8200861–63
9.
HirschJ.E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102200516569–16572
10.
HultG.T.M.NeeseW.T.BashawR.E.Faculty perceptions of marketing journalsJournal of Marketing Education191199737–52
11.
JacsóP.Google Scholar: the pros and the consOnline Information Review2922006208–214
12.
KingD.A.The scientific impact of nationsNature43069972004311–316
13.
MurphyJ.LawR.Google Scholar visibility and tourism journalsAnnals of Tourism Research34320081078–1082
14.
MurphyJ., SoutarG.N., LeeR., SwilleyE., 2007. Online visibility: a complementary way to rank marketing journals.In: Paper Presented at the AMA Summer Conference.
15.
PaulyD.StergiouK.I.Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's citation index and Google's Scholar serviceEthics in Science and Environmental Politics5200533–35
16.
RazzaqueM.A., WilkinsonI.F., 2007. Research performance of senior level marketing academics in the Australian universities: an exploratory study based on citation analysis.In: Proceedings of the 2007 ANZMAC Conference.Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 3281–3286.
17.
SwanA., BrownS., 2005. Open access self-archiving, pp. 1–104. An author study. Retrieved from eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10999/01/jisc2.pdf.
18.
SoutarG.N., 2007. Citation benchmarks for article published by Australian marketing academics.In: Proceedings of the 2007 ANZMAC Conference.Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 3515–3520.
19.
Sullivan-MortG.McColl-KennedyJ.R.KielG.SoutarG.N.Perceptions of marketing journals by senior academics in Australia and New ZealandAustralasian Marketing Journal122200451–61
20.
VargoS.L.LuschR.F.Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketingJournal of Marketing68120041–17
21.
YeungT.A.Deciphering citationsEnvironment and Planning A341220022093–2106
