This exploratory study develops relationship marketing theory by analysing the effect of organizational culture difference on business-to-business relationships. The dyadic data demonstrate three influential dimensions of organizational culture difference in the context of university–industry relationships: Differences in both time orientation and corporate flexibility impact commitment negatively, whereas market orientation difference negatively affects intention to renew. This study also confirms a positive effect of trust, commitment and integration on university–industry relationship success based on a dyadic data set. While trust appears highly influential in relationships with an uncertain future, commitment appears to be of stronger consequence in certain relationships.
AbrattR.KellyP.M.Customer–supplier partnerships: perceptions of a successful key account management programIndustrial Marketing Management3152002467–476
2.
AijoT.S.The theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of relationship marketing: environmental factors behind the changing marketing paradigmEuropean Journal of Marketing30219968–18
3.
AndaleebS.S.Dependence relations and the moderating role of trust: implications for behavioural intentions in marketing channelsInternational Journal of Research in Marketing1221995157–172
4.
AndersenP.H.KumarR.Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: a conceptual model for buyer–seller dyadsIndustrial Marketing Management3542006522–535
5.
AndersonE.WeitzB.The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channelsJournal of Marketing Research241199218–34
6.
AndersonE.WeitzB.Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyadsMarketing Science841989310–323
7.
ArmstrongJ.S.OvertonT.S.Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveysJournal of Marketing Research1431977396–402
8.
AthaideG.A.MeyersP.W.WilemonD.L.Seller–buyer interactions during the commercialization of technological process innovationsJournal of Product Innovation Management1351996406–421
9.
ARC [Australian Research Council]University Research: Technology Transfer and Commercialisation Practices1998Australian Research CouncilCanberra
10.
ARC [Australian Research Council]Mapping the Nature and Extent of Business–University Interaction in Australia1998Australian Research CouncilCanberra
11.
BaakenT.Science marketingKamenzU.Applied Marketing: Anwendungsorientierte Marketingwissenschaft der deutschen Fachhochschulen2003Springer-VerlagBerlin1051–1066
12.
BabinB.J.GriffinM.The nature of satisfaction: an updated examination and analysisJournal of Business Research4121998127–136
BarnesB.R.NaudéP.MichellP.Perceptual gaps and similarities in buyer–seller dyadic relationshipsIndustrial Marketing Management3652007662–675
15.
BarnesT.PashbyI.GibbonsA.Effective university–industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projectsEuropean Management Journal2032002272–285
16.
BarrettH.WeinsteinA.The effect of market orientation and organizational flexibility on corporate entrepreneurshipEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice231199857–70
17.
BendapudiN.BerryL.L.Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providersJournal of Retailing731199715–37
18.
BerghällS.Perceptions of dyadic business relationships: in search of the social psychological basis of interpersonal relationship perceptions in socio-economic exchange relationshipsMarketing Theory31200359–77
19.
BollenK.A.LongJ.S.Testing structural equation models1993Sage PublicationsNewbury Park
20.
BoyleB.DwyerR.F.RobicheauxR.A.SimpsonJ.T.Influence strategies in marketing channels: measure and use in different relationship structuresJournal of Marketing Research24November1992462–473
21.
BucklinL.P.SenguptaS.Organizing successful co-marketing alliancesJournal of Marketing572199332–46
22.
BuonoA.F.BowditchJ.L.LewisJ.W.When cultures collide: the anatomy of a mergerHuman Relations3851985477–500
23.
ByrneB.Structural Equation Modelling with Amos2001Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ
24.
CannonJ.P.HomburgC.Buyer–supplier relationships and customer firm costsJournal of Marketing65January200129–43
25.
ChatterjeS.LubatkinM.SchweigerD.M.WeberY.Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: linking equity and human capitalStrategic Management Journal1351992319–334
26.
CoakesS.J.SteedL.G.SPSS: Analysis without Anguish11th ed.2003John Wiley and Sons Australia Ltd.Milton, QLD
27.
ConwayT.SwiftJ.S.International relationship marketing – The importance of psychic distanceEuropean Journal of Marketing3411/1220001391–1413
28.
CovielloN.E.BrodieR.J.DanaherP.J.JohnstonW.J.How firms relate to their markets: an empirical examination of contemporary marketing practicesJournal of Marketing663200233–46
29.
CyertR.M.GoodmanP.S.Creating effective university–industry alliances: an organizational learning perspectiveOrganizational Dynamics264199745–57
30.
DavisR.E.Compatibility in corporate marriagesHarvard Business Review464196886–93
31.
del Bosque RodgríguezO.R.AugudoJ.C.San Martín GutiérrezH.Determinants of economic and social satisfaction in manufacturer–distributor relationshipsIndustrial Marketing Management3562006666–675
32.
DesphandéR.FarleyJ.U.WebsterF.E.J.Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysisJournal of Marketing57January199323–27
33.
DesphandéR.WebsterF.E.J.Organizational culture and marketing: defining the research agendaJournal of Marketing53January19893–15
34.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ.A.Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated2000Sage PublicationsLondon
35.
DoneyP.M.CannonJ.P.An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationshipsJournal of Marketing612199735–51
36.
DuncanT.MoriartyS.E.A communication-based marketing model for managing relationshipsJournal of Marketing62April19981–13
37.
DwyerR.F.OhS.A transaction cost perspective on vertical contractual structure and interchannel competitive strategiesJournal of Marketing52April198821–34
38.
EggertA.UlagaW.Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets?Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing172/32002107–118
39.
FarrisP.W.ParryM.E.AilawadiK.L.Structural analysis of models with composite dependent variablesMarketing Science111199276–94
40.
FisherR.J.MaltzE.JaworskiB.J.Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: the moderating role of relative functional integrationJournal of Marketing61July199754–70
41.
FleishmanJ.BensonJ.Using LISREL to evaluate measurement models and scale reliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement4741987925–939
42.
FornellC.LarckerD.F.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errorJournal of Marketing Research181198139–50
FrimanM.GärlingT.MillettB.MattssonJ.JohnstonR.An analysis of international business-to-business relationships based on the commitment-trust theoryIndustrial Marketing Management3152002403–409
45.
GanesanS.Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relationshipsJournal of Marketing58April19941–19
46.
GeyskensI.SteenkampJ.-B.E.M.KumarN.Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysisInternational Journal of Research in Marketing1531998223–248
47.
GomesJ.F.S.Weerd-NederhofP.C.PearsonA.W.CunhaM.P.Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product developmentTechnovation2332003185–191
48.
GraysonK.AmblerT.The dark side of long-term relationships in marketing servicesJournal of Marketing Research36February1999123–141
49.
GrönroosC.From marketing mix to relationship marketing: towards a paradigm shift in marketingManagement Decision32219944–20
50.
GummessonE.Relationship marketing and a new economy: it's time for de-programmingJournal of Services Marketing1672002585–589
51.
GundlachG.T.AchrolR.S.MentzerJ.T.The structure of commitment in exchangeJournal of Marketing591199578–92
52.
GuptaA.K.WilemonD.Atuah-GimaK.Excelling in R&DResearch Technology Management433200052–58
53.
GuptaA.K.RajS.P.WilemonD.A model for studying R&D-marketing interface in the production innovation processJournal of Marketing50April19867–17
54.
HairJ.H.J.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L.BlackW.C.Multivariate Data Analysisfifth ed.1998Prentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ
55.
HarkerM.J.Relationship marketing defined? An examination of current relationship marketing definitionsMarketing Intelligence and Planning171199913–20
56.
HayesK., FitzgeraldA., 2005. Preliminary findings of an investigation into interactions between commercial and scientific occupational cultures in hybrid research organisations. In: Sixth CINet Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.
57.
Hennig-ThurauT.GwinnerK.P.GremlerD.D.Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational benefits and relationship qualityJournal of Service Research432002230–247
58.
HewettK.MoneyR.B.SharmaS.An exploration of the moderating role of buyer corporate culture in industrial buyer–seller relationshipsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science3032002229–239
59.
JapS.D.GanesanS.Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitmentJournal of Marketing Research37May2000227–245
60.
JaworskiB.J.KohliA.K.Market orientation: antecedents and consequencesJournal of Marketing57July199353–70
61.
JohnG.ReveT.The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channelsJournal of Marketing Research19November1982517–524
62.
JohnsonJ.L.Strategic integration in industrial distribution channels: managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic assetJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science27119994–18
63.
JohnstonW.J.LewinJ.E.SpekmanR.E.International industrial marketing interactions: dyadic and network perspectivesJournal of Business Research4631999259–271
64.
JordanJ.Controlling knowledge flows in international alliancesEuropean Business Journal162200470–71
65.
JusterF.T., 1966. Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: an experiment in survey design.National Bureau of Economic Research, Colombia University Press.
66.
KaplanD.A rejoinder on evaluating and modifying covariance structure modelsMultivariate Behavioural Research2521990197–204
67.
KimK.On interfirm power, channel climate, and solidarity in industrial distributor–supplier dyadsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2832000388–405
68.
KingshottR.P.J.The impact of psychological contracts upon trust and commitment within supplier–buyer relationships: a social exchange viewIndustrial Marketing Management3562006724–739
69.
KitchellS.Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: a qualitative/quantitative approachJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2331995195–205
70.
KleinK.J.DansereauF.HallR.J.Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysisAcademy of Management Review1921994195–229
71.
KlineR.B.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modellingsecond ed.2005The Guilford PressNew York
72.
KohliA.K.JaworskiB.J.Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implicationsJournal of Marketing54April19901–18
73.
LangerakF.The effects of market orientation on the behaviours of salespersons and purchasers, channel relationships, and performance of manufacturersInternational Journal of Research in Marketing1832001221–234
74.
LeeY.S.The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: an empirical assessmentJournal of Technology Transfer2522000111–133
75.
LeiM.LomaxR.D.The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modellingStructural Equation Modelling12120051–27
76.
LeisenB.LillyB.WinsorR.D.The effects of organizational culture and market orientation on the effectiveness of strategic marketing alliancesJournal of Services Marketing1632002201–222
77.
LiZ.G.DantR.P.An exploratory study of exclusive dealing in channel relationshipsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2531997201–213
78.
MartínS.S.GutiérrezJ.CamareroC.Trust as the key to relational commitmentJournal of Relationship Marketing31200453–78
79.
MedlinC.J., AurifeilleJ.-M., QuesterP.G., 2001. A collaborative interest model of relational coordination and empirical results, 2001IMP Conference: Oslo.
80.
MoormanC.ZaltmanG.DeshpandeR.Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizationsJournal of Marketing Research2431992314–328
81.
Mora-ValentínE.M.Montoro-Sánchezá.Guerras-MartínL.A.Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organisationsResearch Policy331200417–40
82.
MorganR.M.HuntS.D.The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketingJournal of Marketing583199420–38
83.
OliverR.L.A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisionsJournal of Marketing Research17November1980460–469
84.
ParkheA.Interfirm diversity, organizational learning and longevity in global strategic alliancesJournal of International Business Studies2241991579–601
85.
PattersonP.G.SprengR.A.Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: an empirical examinationInternational Journal of Service Industry Management851997414–434
86.
PlewaC.QuesterP.G.BaakenT.Relationship marketing and university–industry linkages: a conceptual frameworkMarketing Theory542005431–454
87.
RauyruenP.MillerK.E.Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyaltyJournal of Business Research601200721–31
88.
ReynoldsP.D.Organizational culture as related to industry, position and performance: a preliminary reportJournal of Management Studies2331986333–345
89.
RogersE.Diffusion of Innovations1983The Free PressNew York
90.
RousseauD.M.SitkinS.B.BurtR.S.CamererC.Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trustAcademy of Management Review2331998393–404
91.
RoweK., 2002. The measurement of latent and composite variables from multiple items or indicators: applications in performance indicator systems, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Seminar Series, Melbourne.
92.
SantoroM.ChakrabartiA.K.Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactionsResearch Policy31720021163–1180
93.
SarkarM.B.EchambadiR.CavusgilS.T.AulakhP.S.The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performanceJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2942001358–373
94.
SeppänenR.BlomqvistK.SundqvistS.Measuring inter-organizational trust – a critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003Industrial Marketing Management3622007249–265
95.
SeymorP.BrennanM.Predicting purchase quantities: further investigation of the Juster scaleMarketing Bulletin5May199421–36
96.
SharmaN.PattersonP.G.The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional servicesJournal of Services Marketing1321999151–170
97.
ShethJ.N.ParvatiyarA.Evolving relationship marketing into a disciplineJournal of Relationship Marketing1120023–16
98.
SiegelD.S.WaldmannD.LinkA.Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory studyResearch Policy321200327–48
99.
SmithJ.B.BarclayD.W.The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationshipsJournal of Marketing61January19973–21
100.
SongX.M.ParryM.R.A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United StatesJournal of Marketing61April19971–18
101.
SteenkampJ.-B.E.M.BaumgartnerH.On the use of structural equation models for marketing modellingInternational Journal of Research in Marketing172–32000195–202
102.
TikkanenH., TuominenP., 2000. Studying change and dynamics in business relationships – the processual case study approach.In: 16th Annual IMP Conference, Bath, United Kingdom.
103.
Van BruggenG.H.KackerM.NieuwlaatC.The impact of channel function performance on buyer–seller relationships in marketing channelsInternational Journal of Research in Marketing2222005141–158
104.
VareyR.J.BallantyneD.Relationship marketing and the challenge of dialogical interactionJournal of Relationship Marketing43–4200511–28
105.
WalterA., MuellerT.A., HelfertG., 2000. The impact of satisfaction, trust, and relationship value on commitment: theoretical considerations and empirical results.In: 16th Annual IMP Conference, Bath, United Kingdom.
106.
WeberY.Corporate cultural fit and performance in mergers and acquisitionsHuman Relations49919961181–1202
107.
WeitzB.JapS.D.Relationship marketing in distribution channelsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2341995305–320
108.
WelchS.Sampling by referral in dispersed populationPublic Opinion Quarterly3921975237–245
109.
WileyJ.WilkinsonI.YoungL.Evaluating a model of industrial relationship performance: A comparison of European and Chinese results using the IMP data baseAustralasian Marketing Journal132200549–60
110.
WilsonA.M.Understanding organisational culture and the implications for corporate marketingEuropean Journal of Marketing353/42001353–367
111.
YoungC.L.WilkinsonI.F.The role of trust and co-operation in marketing channels: a preliminary studyEuropean Journal of Marketing2321989109–122
