The Effect of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse on Urethral Pressure Profile

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether anterior vaginal wall prolapse will cause a decrease in urethral pressure.

Methods: Two hundred ninety-four patients with uterovaginal prolapse served as study cases. In addition, 127 patients without uterovaginal prolapse were included as controls. The urethral pressure profile measurement was performed using a microtransducer and the fluid-bridge method with the patient in the lithotomy position. The parameters of the urethral pressure profile and its associated variables were compared between the control and study groups.

Results: The proximal portion of urethral pressure and the resting and stress urethral closure pressures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse were significantly lower than those of the control group. An indention segment (or a plateau pressure zone) in the proximal portion of the urethral pressure profile curve was noted in patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse, especially for stage I (64.2%) and stage II (73.0%). Anterior vaginal wall prolapse and genuine stress incontinence had a statistically significant odds ratio for predicting the presence of an indentation segment (or a plateau pressure zone) in the proximal portion of the unrethral pressure profile curve (1.58 and 3.19, respectively).

Conclusions: An indention segment (or a plateau pressure zone) of the proximal portion of the wrethral pressure profile curve was observed in most of our patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Defects in the anterior vaginal wall supports may attenuate the proximal urethral support, and these defects will contribute to a reduction in the proximal urethyral pressure.

Keywords

Anterior vaginal wall prolapse proximal urethra urethral pressure profile uterovaginal prolapse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. DeLancey JOL . Anatomy and physiology of urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1990;33:298-307.

2. Borstad E , Rud T . the risk of developing urinary stress incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women—A clinical and urodynamic follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1989;68:545-549.

3. Bump R , Bo K , Brubaker L , et al. The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-17.

4. McGuire EJ . Urodynamic findings in patients after failure of stress incontinent operations. Prog Clin Biol Res 1981;351:78-82.

5. Sand P , Bowen L , Panganiba R , et al. The low pressure urethra and a factor in failed retropublic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:399-402.

6. Abrams P , Cadozo L , Fall M , et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:67-78.

7. Abrams P , Blaivas JG , Stanton SL , Anderson JT . The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988;14:5-19.

8. Bump RC < Fantl JA , Glenn Hurt W . The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: Results of barrier studies. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:291-295.

9. DeLancey JOL . Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1713-1723.

10.

10. DeLancey JOL . Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1717-1728.

11.

11. Nichols DH . Anterior colporhaphy. In Nichols DH , Randall CL , etds. Vaginal surgery. New York: D. Appelton & Co, 1989:239-240.

12.

12. Richardson DA , Bent AE , Ostergard DR . The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:901-905.

13.

13. Westby M , Asmussen M , Ulmsten U . Location maximum intraurethral pressure related to urogenital diagragm in the female subjects as studied by simultaneous urethrocystometry and voiding urethrocystography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:408-412.

14.

14. Asmussen M , Ulmsten U . On the physiology of continence and pathophysiology of stress incontinence in the female. Contr Gynecol Obstet 1983;10:32-50.

15.

15. Summit RL , Sipes DR II , Bent AE , Ostergard DR . Evaluation of pressure transmission ratios in women with genuine stress incontinence and low urethral pressure: A comparative study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:984-988.

16.

16. Hilton P , Stanton SL . Urethral pressure measurement by icrotransducer: The results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1983;90:919-933.

17.

17. Haadem K . The effects of parturition on female pelvic floor anatomy and function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994;6:326-330.

18.

18. Versi E . Discriminant analysis of urethral pressure profilometry data for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990;97:251-259.

19.

19. Rosenzweig BA , Bhatia NN , Nelson AL . Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry pressure transmission ratio: What do the numbers really mean? Obster Gynecol 1991;77:586-590.

20.

20. Ball TL . Anterior and posterior cystocele: Cystocele revisited; an account of the twilight hours of some antifacialists and facilists as I know them. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1966;9:1062-1069.