This paper addresses the need for action by examining the underlying shortcomings in current quality assurance (QA) principles and programs. An attempt is made to find some solutions through examining theories of program evaluation (PE). Developed through the use of QA and PE principles, a conceptual model for program-based QA is presented, and examples of program-based QA are given. Conclusions are drawn regarding the utility of a properly designed QA program to address the criticisms levied against many current systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShestowskyB.J.1988. Quality assurance systems need a second look. Dimensions65(2): 28.
2.
WilsonC.1987. The death of Lycias, the messenger. Health Management Forum8(4): 48.
3.
ClemenhagenC.1987. Quality assurance in Canada: Barriers and criticisms. Quality Assurance Quarterly4(4): 3.
4.
DaviesG.1986. What does the future hold for quality assurance?Australian Clinical Review6(21): 110.
5.
StuartN.RutmanL. and StaiseyN.1985. Program evaluation in hospitals. Health Management Forum6(2): 12.
6.
NutterR.W. and WeidenT.1985. A reconciliation of program evaluation and quality assurance. Paper read at the Canadian Evaluation Society (Alberta Chapter) Annual Conference, 27–29 April 1985.
7.
ClemenhagenC. and ChampagneF.1986. Quality assurance as part of program evaluation: Guidelines for managers and clinical department heads. Quality Review Bulletin12(11): 383–387.
8.
O'BrienN.RennebohmH. and LoweC.1987. Organization schema for management control of quality care: A program perspective. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation2(4): 11–21.
