Alberta's Acute Care Funding Project

Abstract

Alberta initiated the Acute Care Funding Project (ACFP) in 1988, a new hospital funding system that institutes case mix budgeting adjustments to the global budget so that hospitals can be treated more equitably. The initiative is a significant departure in principle from the former method of funding.

The ACFP is summarized and critiqued, and focuses on the inpatient side of the picture. The various elements of the project are discussed, such as the hospital performance index, the hospital performance measure, the Refined Diagnostic Related Group, case weights, typical and outlier cases, and the costing mechanisms. Since its implementation, the ACFP has undergone substantial changes; these are discussed, as well as some of the problems that still need to be addressed.

Overall, the system offers incentives to reduce length of stay and to increase the efficiency with which inpatient care is provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Botz

C.K.

and Singh

1985. Calculating the cost of CMGs in a Canadian hospital. Health Care February: 53–56.

Alberta Health. March 1990. Acute Care Funding Project. Project Overview and Future Funding Framework for Alberta Hospitals, mimeo, Edmonton.

Botz

C.K.

1985. CMGs and DRGs: Can they further improve efficiency? Dimensions in Health Services September: 40–41.

McCready

D.J.

and Rahn

1986. Funding human services: Fixed utility versus fixed budget. Administration in Social Work 10(4): 23–30.

McCready

D.J.

and Rahn

1987. Evaluation and hospital funding. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 2(1): 25–32.

Alberta Hospital Funding Project. May 1983. A Summary of the Medicus Report. Submitted to the Advisory Committee, Alberta Hospital Funding Project, Edmonton.

Alberta Health. March 1990. Acute Care Funding Project. Project Overview and Future Funding: Framework for Alberta Hospitals, mimeo, Edmonton.

Greenway-Coates

January 1990. A Description of the Severity of Illness Project. Unpublished manuscript prepared for Alberta Health, Kingston: Case Mix Research, Queen's University.

Alberta Health. March 1990. Acute Care Funding Project. Funding Framework: Inpatient Funding Mechanism Incorporating Severity of Illness, mimeo, Edmonton.

10.

Case Mix Research. March 1990. Technical Brief on the Development of the Hospital Performance Index, Kingston: Queen's University.

11.

This system is also called the refined group number or RGN.

12.

Health Systems Management Group. August 1990. RDRGs: Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. Definitions Manual, version 2.3, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University. For an introductory explanation see Dove

1991. Refined DRGs. For the record. — Weekly News Magazine of the Medical Record Administrators and Technicians 3(1): 4–7.

13.

The number of groups within the classification system will vary from version to version.

14.

Hospital Medical Records Institute. “ICD-9 and ICD-9-CM”. Toronto, HMRI, n.d. CMGs were developed by HMRI, and HMRI provides hospitals with reports using this format. It was formerly possible, with some exceptions, to map CMGs into DRGs. Recent refinements to the CMG system have made such mapping almost impossible.

15.

Botz

C.K.

1989. Weighting case mix groups: The fatal flaw in resource intensity weights. Healthcare Management Forum, 2(1): 8–11.

16.

Case Mix Research. February 1989. Indirect Costs of Teaching Hospitals in Canadian Hospitals, Kingston: Queen's University.

17.

McKenzie

T.A.

Willan

A.R.

Cox

and Green

1991. Indirect costs of Teaching in Canadian hospitals. Canadian Medical Association Journal 144(2): 149–152.

18.

Barer

M.L.

and Evans

R.G.

January 1980. Hospital Costs Over Time: Approaches to Price Deflation and Output Standardization, mimeo, University of British Columbia.

19.

Alberta Health, Economics and Statistics. February 4, 1991. Detailed Calculations of Inpatient and 'Non-Inpatient Expenditure Proportions, mimeo, revised, Edmonton.

20.

Ohio Department of Health. January 1989. A Review of Severity of Illness Measures, Columbus: Office of Health Policy and Analysis.

21.

Miller

M.K.

Barton

M.J.

Cuddeback

J.K.

January 1990. Severity of Illness Measures for Acute Care Hospitals, Gainesville, Ha.: Center for Health Policy Research, University of Florida.

22.

Illinois Health Cost Containment Council. 1991. Analysis of the Refined DRG as a Severity of Illness System, technical report, Springfield, Ill.