Des exigences concurrentielles de ressources financières au sein du système de santé obligent les pourvoyeurs de soins de santé à assurer l'utilisation la plus efficace possible de ces ressources. Les résultats provenant des États-Unis, du Royaume-Uni et d'autres juridictions suggèrent que les systèmes de prestation de services de santé intégrée (SPI) peuvent être une façon rentable de satisfaire aux besoins en soins d'une population. Cet article présente un cadre à utiliser lors de la surveillance et de l'évaluation du rendement d'un système de prestation intégrée. L'élaboration d'un cadre d'évaluation utilisé de façon cohérente pour les systèmes de prestation intégrée offrira au gouvernement, aux conseils de direction et aux autres évaluateurs un outil d'évaluation efficace qui leur permettra de mieux comprendre l'impact du SPI sur le système de santé. De l'information sera aussi disponible pour permettre l'amélioration constante du rendement au sein du système.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShortellSMGilliesRRAndersonDAMitchellJBMorganKL. Creating organized delivery systems: The barriers and facilitators. Hospital & Health Services Administration1993; 38(4): 447–466.
2.
MarriottJMabelAL. Integrated Models — International Trends and Implications for Canada. Document pour le Forum national sur la santé. Ottawa, 1996.
3.
LeattPPinkGHNaylorCD. Integrated delivery systems: Has their time come in Canada?Journal de l'Association médicale canadienne1996; 154(6): 803–809.
4.
RoosNP. From research to policy: What have we learned from designing the population health information system?Medical Care1995; 33(12): DS132–DS145.
5.
KanterRMBrinkerhoffD. Organizational performance. Annual Review of Sociology1981; 7: 321–49.
6.
Premier's Council on Health, Well-being and Social Justice.A Framework for Evaluating Devolution. Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1994.
FloodABShortellSMScottWR. Organizational performance: Organizing for efficiency and effectiveness. In: ShortellSMKaluznyAD (réd.). Health Care Management: Organization Design and Behavior (3e éd.). Albany, NY, Delmar Publishers Inc, 1994.
9.
ZuckermanHSKaluznyADRickettsTC. Alliances in health care: What we know, what we think we know, and what we should know. Health Care Management Review1995; 20(1): 54–64.
10.
KaplanRSNortonDP. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review1996; janvier-février: 75–85.
11.
KaplanRSNortonDP. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review1993; septembre-octobre: 134–147.
12.
KaplanRSNortonDP. The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review1992; janvier-février: 71–79.
13.
BakerGRPinkGH. Une fiche de pointage équilibrée pour les hôpitaux canadiens. FORUM Gestion des soins de santé1995; 8(4): 14–21.
14.
RothAVJacksonWE. Strategic determinants of service quality and performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Management Science1995; 41(11): 1720–1733.
15.
ShortellSMGilliesRRAndersonDA. The new world of managed care: Creating organized delivery systems. Health Affairs1994; 13(5): 46–64.
16.
PointerDDAlexanderJAZuckermanHS. Loosening the Gordian knot of governance in integrated health care delivery systems. Frontiers of Health Services Management1995; 11(3): 3–37.
17.
ShortellSMGilliesRRAndersonDAEricksonKMMitchellJB. Remaking Health Care in America: Building Organized Delivery Systems. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1996.
18.
LeggatSGLeattP. Monitoring and evaluating strategic alliances in health care. In LeattPLemieux-CharlesLAirdCLeggatSG (réd.). Strategic Alliances in Health Care. Ottawa, Collège canadien des directeurs de services de santé, 1996: 199–209.
19.
ClarksonMBE. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review1995; 20(1): 92–117.
20.
BlairJDFottlerMD. Challenges in Health Care Management. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1990.
21.
PerrowC. Three types of effectiveness studies. In: GoodmanPSPenningsJM and Associates. New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1977.
22.
WeissCH. Where politics and evaluation research meet. In: PalumboDJ (réd.) The Politics of Program Evaluation. London, Sage Publications, 1987.
23.
RushBOgborneA. Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program, planning and evaluation. La Revue canadienne d'évaluation de programme1991; 6(2): 95–106.
HallRHClarkJPGiordinoPCJohnsonPVVanRockelM. Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly1977; 22: 457–470.
26.
ChildJ. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance — Part I. Journal of Management Studies1974; 11: 175–189.
27.
SteersRM. Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly1975; 20: 546–557.
28.
MarkhamBLomasJ. Review of the multi-hospital arrangements literature: Benefits, disadvantages and lessons for implementation. FORUM Gestion des soins de santé1995; 8(3): 24–35.
29.
KaluznyADLaceyLMWarneckeRHynesDMMorrisseyJFordL. Predicting the performance of a strategic alliance: An analysis of the community clinical oncology program. Health Services Research1993; 28(2): 159–182.
