Selecting Clinical Outcome Indicators for Monitoring Quality of Care

Abstract

Clinical outcome indicators are used to identify opportunities for improvement in patient care processes. This paper focuses on issues specific to the selection of clinical outcome indicators for use in assessing performance within and between hospitals. The issues and examples are based on the experiences of a university research team that worked in collaboration with a group of teaching hospitals to develop and monitor clinical outcome indicators. Four sets of issues are discussed: the intended use, and end users of indicator information; aspects of indicator validity; data quality; and dissemination and use of indicator information. Recommendations are made that apply to individual hospitals, groups of hospitals and health care systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lohr

. Outcome measurement: Concepts and questions. Inquiry 1988; 25: 37–50.

O'Leary

. The measurement mandate: Report card day is coming. Journal of Quality Improvement 1993; 19(11): 487–491.

Reinertsen

. Outcomes management and continuous quality improvement: The compass and the rudder. Quality Review Bulletin 1993; 19: 5–7.

Donabedian

. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, Mich., Health Administration Press, 1980.

Bernstein

and Hilborne

. Clinical indicators: The road to quality of care? Journal on Quality Improvement 1993; 19: 501–509.

Francome

and Savage

. Caesarean section in Britain and the United States —12% or 24%: Is either the right rate? Social Science and Medicine 1993; 37: 1199–1218.

Shearer

. Cesarean section: Medical benefits and costs. Ibid: 1223–1231.

Nelson

. Measuring for improvement: Why, what, when, how, for whom? Quality Connection 1995; 4(2): 1–3.

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Primer on Indicator Development and Application: Measuring Quality in Health Care. Oakbrook Terrace, Ill., 1990.

10.

Roos

and Brazauskas

. Outcomes and quality assurance: Facilitating the use of administrative data. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1990; 2: 77–88.

11.

Shortell

. Theory Z: Implications and relevance for health care management. Health Care Management Review 1982; 7: 7–21.

12.

Brooks

JHJ

Renz

Richardson

Whilte

, and Hosey

. Systems versus performance problems: A peer review organization's perspective. Quality Review Bulletin 1992; 18: 172–177.

13.

McLaughlin

and Kaluzny

. Total quality management in health: Making it work. Health Care Management Review 1991; 15: 7.

14.

Iezzoni

. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, Mich., Health Administration Press, 1994.

15.

Charlson

. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A response. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1993; 46: 1083–1084.

16.

Deyo

. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A response. Ibid: 1081–1082.

17.

Romano

Roos

, and Jollis

. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives. Ibid: 1075–1079.

18.

Charlson

Pompei

Ales

, and MacKenzie

. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease 1987; 40: 373–383.