Rosabeth Moss Kanter's1 model of organizational empowerment was used to examine the effects of a multidisciplinary teamwork project initiated in preparation for a 1995 Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation survey. Kanter1 maintains that work structures such as teams foster opportunities to learn and grow, provide access to information, support and resources, empower employees, and result in increased work satisfaction and effectiveness. Staff who participated on multidisciplinary teams to prepare for the accreditation survey (n = 210) and a random sample of staff who did not participate on the teams (n = 348) were surveyed to ascertain their perceptions of work-related empowerment and job satisfaction. Consistent with Kanter's propositions, members participating on teams had higher empowerment scores and perceived access to empowerment structures to be more important than members not participating on these teams. Overall, perceived access to empowerment structures was found to be significantly lower than perceived importance of access to the empowerment structures. The results of this study support the use of multidisciplinary teams as one work redesign strategy for enhancing work effectiveness in the health care environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KanterRM. Men and women of the corporation. 2nd ed.New York: Basic Books, 1993.
2.
RandolphWA. Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational Dynamics1995; 23(4): 19–32.
3.
RyanJ. Employees speak on quality in ASQC/Gallup survey. Quality Progress1993; 26(12): 51–53.
4.
KatzARuss-EftDMoranLRavishankarLMillerZ. Team members speak out. Journal of Quality and Participation1995; 18(5): 76–81.
5.
KinseyM. Go team. Empowering employees: One company's successful transition. Credit World1995; 83(5): 28–31.
6.
DonovanM. A key ingredient in designing self-managing workteams. The empowerment plan. Journal for Quality and Participation1994; 17(4): 12–14.
7.
HibbertESt. ArnaudSDharampaulS. Nurses' satisfaction with the patient care team. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation1994; 8(2): 87–95.
8.
HorakBJGuarinoJHKnightCCKwederSL. Building a team on a medical floor. Health Care Management Review1991; 16(2): 65–71.
9.
HutchisonGAddington-HallJBowerMAustenMCoombesC. An evaluation of patient satisfaction with care provided by a multidisciplinary cancer team. European Journal of Cancer Care1991; 1(1): 15–18.
10.
HaigAJNagyALeBreckBSteinGL. Outpatient planning for persons with physical disabilities: A randomized prospective trial of physiatrist alone versus a multi-disciplinary team. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation1995; 76(4): 341–348.
11.
PoultonBCWestMA. Effective multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing1993; 18: 918–925.
12.
WilliamsMEWilliamsTFZimmerJGHallWJPodgorskiCA. How does the team approach to outpatient geriatric evaluation compare with traditional care: A report of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of American Geriatric Society1987; 35: 1071–1078.
13.
SovieMD. Care and service teams: A new imperative. Nursing Economics1992; 10(2): 94–100.
14.
Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation (CCHSA).A client-centred approach: 1995 standards for acute care organizations. Ottawa: CCHSA, November 1994.
15.
SengePM. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York (NY): Currency Doubleday, 1990.
16.
KatzenbachJRSmithDK. The wisdom of teams: Creating a high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
17.
CorderyJLMuellerWSSmithLM. Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal1991; 34(2): 464–476.
18.
KoernerBLCohenJRArmstrongDM. Collaborative practice and patient satisfaction: Impact and selected outcomes. Evaluation & Health Professions1995; 8(3): 299–321.
19.
BaggsJ GedneyRyanSAPhelpsCERichesonJFJohnsonJE. Collaboration in critical care: The association between interdisciplinary collaboration and patient outcomes in a medical intensive care unit. Heart & Lung1992; 21(1): 18–24.
20.
AdlerSLBrykECestaTGMcEachenI. Collaboration: The solution to multidisciplinary care planning. Orthopaedic Nursing1995; 14(2): 21–29.
21.
KimballL. Collaborative care: A quality improvement and cost reduction tool. Journal of Hospital Quality1993; 15(4): 6–9.
22.
RudsillPTPhillipsMPayneCM. Clinical paths for cardiac surgery patients: A multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality1994; 8(3): 27–33.
23.
HoustonKLCluteCRyan-CrepinKKimballMMatthewsR. TQM brings collaboration to patient transport process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality1994; 9(1): 21–29.
24.
JirschD. Patient-focused care: The systemic implications of change. Healthcare Management FORUM1993; 6(4): 27–32.
25.
LaschingerHKS. A theoretical approach to studying work empowerment in nursing: A review of studies testing Kanter's theory of structural power in organizations. Nursing Administration Quarterly1996; 20(2): 25–41.
26.
KanterRM. Dilemmas of managing participation. Organizational Dynamics1982; 11(1): 5–27.
27.
LaschingerHKS. Measuring empowerment from Kanter's (1977;1993) theoretical perspective. Journal of Shared Governance1996; 2(4): 23–26.
28.
DubucMLL. Job-related empowerment and commitment in military nursing: An extension study. London: University of Western Ontario, 1995. Unpublished masters' thesis.
29.
HuffmanJJ. Staff nurses' perceptions of work empowerment and control over nursing practice in community hospital settings. London: University of Western Ontario, 1995. Unpublished masters' research report.
30.
McKayCE. The relationship between staff nurses' perceived job empowerment and first-line managerial leadership styles. London: University of Western Ontario, 1995. Unpublished research report.
31.
LaschingerHKSHavensDS. Staff nurse work empowerment and perceived control over practice, work satisfaction and work effectiveness. Manuscript submitted for publication in Nursing Economics, 1995.
32.
ChandlerGE. The relationship of nursing work environment to empowerment and powerlessness. Salt Lake City (Utah): University of Utah, 1986.
33.
LaschingerHKSKutzscherLITSabistonJA. Job activities scale. London: University of Western Ontario, 1995. Unpublished data collection instrument.
34.
LaschingerHKSSabistonJAKutzscherLIT. Organizational relationship scale. London: University of Western Ontario, 1995. Unpublished data collection instrument.
35.
BassBMAvolioB. Transformational leadership development manual for the multi factor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990.
