One of the priorities of governments in Canada is to reduce long waiting times for health services. This has raised the prospect of introducing waiting time care guarantees. Such guarantees affirm the healthcare system's social contract with the public and provide an entitlement to Canadians to receive timely care. There are clinical, legal and political implications, which must be considered and well managed before introduction. Other countries have ventured down this path. They teach us that waiting time care guarantees are good policy and make good sense. Correspondingly, they remind us not to make a promise we are not ready to keep.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
v. QuebecChaoulli (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 35.
2.
The Royal Commission on the Future of Healthcare in Canada. Building on values: The future of healthcare in Canada — Final Report; 2002. Ottawa, ON. ISBN 0-662-33043-9.
3.
The Canadian Medical Association as a member of the multi-faceted organization, the Wait Time Alliance. No more time to wait: Towards benchmarks and best practices in wait-time management (interim report). Ottawa, ON: Waiting Time Alliance; 2005.
4.
Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. The health of Canadians — The federal role: Recommendations for reform (Vol. 6). Ottawa, ON; 2002.
5.
Premiers Advisory Council on Health for Alberta. A framework for reform;December 2001. ISBN 0-7785-1547-8;ISBN 0-7785-1548-6.
6.
BourneRDeBoerDHawkerGKrederHMahomedNPatersonJ. Total hip and knee replacement. In: TuJPinfoldSMcColganPLaupacisA, editors. Access to health services in Ontario: ICES atlas. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services; 2005.
7.
Government of New Zealand.Government strategy for reduced waiting times for public hospital elective services; March 2000. Government document.
8.
European Observatory on Healthcare Systems.Healthcare systems in transition: Australia; 2001. AMS 5012667. ISSN 1020–9077, Vol. 3, No. 13.
9.
Western Canada Waiting List Project.From chaos to order: Making sense of waiting lists in Canada — Final report. Edmonton, AB; Author; 2001. Available from: http://www.wcwl.ca.
10.
Toward establishing evidence-based benchmarks for acceptable waiting times for joint replacement surgery — Report #1;July 2005. Available from: http://www.wcwl.ca
11.
Towards establishing evidence-based benchmarks for acceptable waiting times for joint replacement surgery — Report #2;October 2005. Available from: http://www.wcwl.ca
12.
Sight restoration: Benchmark waiting times for cataract removal and corneal transplantation — Report #1;July 2005. Available from: http://www.wcwl.ca
13.
Sight restoration: Benchmark waiting times for cataract removal and corneal transplantation — Report #2;October 2005. Available from: http://www.wcwl.ca
The National Health Service of the United Kingdom. Planning framework 2005-06-07/08: Waiting and long-term conditions. London; 2004. Gateway Reference: 3693.
21.
European Observatory on Healthcare Systems. Healthcare systems in transition: United Kingdom. London; 1999. AMS 5001890 CARE 04 01 01.
22.
The National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom. The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform; 2000. Cm 4818-I.
23.
European Observatory on Healthcare Systems. Healthcare systems in transition: Spain; 2000. AMS 5012667 (SPA).
24.
European Observatory on Healthcare Systems. Healthcare systems in transition: Italy; 2001. EUR/01/5012667 (ITA).
25.
NoseworthyTMcGurranJJ, Hadorn D, and the Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project. Waiting for scheduled services in Canada: Development of priority-setting scoring systems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice2003; 9(1): 23–31.
26.
Western Canada Waiting List Project. Final report: Moving forward. Calgary, AB; Author; February 28, 2005. Available from: http://www.wcwl.org
