As clinicians practicing wound management in all three sectors of the healthcare system, the authors have articulated specific issues relating to wound management. There is a lack of awareness of the extent of the problem. Best practice guidelines have been developed, however, their adoption and transfer into practice have been inconsistent. Basic education in the field is minimal or absent across all disciplines. Institutions and agencies lack the infrastructure and financial resources to support optimal healthcare delivery in wound prevention and management. As a result, there are significant problems and inconsistencies in access to wound care across Ontario.
This paper reviews the issues and background as related to pressure ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer and venous leg ulcer. Finally, the authors make specific health policy recommendations regarding the implementation of regional wound care teams.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Canada.Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Saskatoon, SK: The Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002. [R.J. Romanow, Chair; final report]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/care/romanow/index1.html
2.
BrandeisGHMorrisJNNashDJLipsitzLA. The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents. JAMA1990; 264(22): 2905–2909.
3.
TorangeauAECranleyLAJeffsL. Understanding the determinants of mortality: Recommendations for improving quality and patient safety. Quality and Safety in Healthcare200615: 4–8.
4.
KuwaharaMTadaHMashibaKYuriugiSIiokaHNiitsumaKYasudaY. Mortality and recurrence rate alter pressure ulcer operations for elderly long-term bed-ridden patients. Annals of Plastic Surgery2005; 54(6): 629–632.
5.
MaklebustJ. Pressure ulcers: The great insult. Nursing Clinics of North America2005; 40(2): 365–389.
6.
DonaldsonLJ. Patient safety: Global momentum builds. Quality and Safety in Healthcare2004; 13: 86.
7.
WoodburyMGHoughtonPE. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian healthcare settings. Ostomy Wound Management2004; 50(10): 22–38.
8.
FosterCFrischSDenisNForlerNJagoM. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian institutions. Canadian Association of Enterostomal Therapy1992; 11(2): 23–31.
9.
CampbellKEKeastDHWoodburyMGHoughtonPETrenholmeK. Cost effectiveness and quality of life: Effects of electrical stimulation on pressure ulcers. Poster presented to the Symposium of Advanced Wound Care, 11th annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Wound Care, Miami, FL, April 1998.
10.
AllenJHoughtonPE. Electrical stimulation: A case study for a Stage III pressure ulcer. Wound Care Canada2004; 2(1): 34–36.
11.
LangemoDKMellandHHansonDOlsonBHunterS. The lived experience of having a pressure ulcer: A qualitative analysis. Advances in Skin & Wound Care2000; 13: 225–235.
Health Canada.Foundation for Accountability; 2001.
15.
EggersPWGohdesDPughJ. Nontraumatic lower extremity amputations in the medicare endstage renal disease population. Kidney International1999; 56(4): 1524–1533.
16.
PricePEHardingKG. Cardiff wound impact schedule: The development of a condition-specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb. International Wound Journal2004; 1(1): 10–17.
HarrisonMBGrahamIDLorimerKFriedbergEPierscianowskiTBrandysT. Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service. CMAJ2001; 172 (11): 1447–1452
19.
CallamMJRuckleyCVHarperDRDaleJJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: Extent of the problem and provision of care. British Medical Journal1985; 290: 1855–1856.
20.
CornwallJVDoreCJLewisJD. Leg ulcers: Epidemiology and aetiology. Br J Surg1986; 73: 693–696.
21.
BakerSRStaceyMC. Epidemiology of chronic leg ulcers in Australia. Aust NZ J Surg1994; 64: 258–261.
22.
NelzenOBergqvistDLindhagenA. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: Clinical history and appearance, in a population study. Br J Surg1994; 81: 182–187.
23.
NelzenOBergqvistDLindhagenA. The prevalence of chronic lower-limb ulceration has been underestimated: Results of a validated population questionnaire. Br J Surg1996; 83: 255–258.
24.
FriedbergEHHarrisonMBGrahamID. Current home care expenditures for persons with leg ulcers. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing2002; 29(4): 186–192.
25.
HurdT. Oral presentation to the Canadian Association of Wound Care; 2003.
26.
TeagueLMMahoneyJL. Cost-effective wound care: How the advanced practice nurse role can positively affect outcomes in an acute care setting. Wound Care Canada2004; 2(1): 32–33.
27.
CampbellKEWoodburyMGSt-CyrDHutchinsonBEvansWLaforetK. CAWC survey on clinical practice issues. Wound Care Canada2004; 2(1): 16–17.
28.
Sibbald2006. Personal communication.
29.
Teague. 2006.
30.
SunnakA. LHINs: Bringing it all back home. Registered Nurse Journal2005; 17(4): 12–16.
31.
HorrocksSAndersonESalisburyC. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ2002; 324: 819–823.
32.
Bryant-LukosiusDDiCensoABrouseGPinelliJ. Advanced practice nursing roles: Development, implementation and evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing2004; 48(5): 519–529.
33.
WoodburyMGHoughtonPECampbellKEKeastDH. Development, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a new leg ulcer measurement tool. Advances in Skin & Wound Care2004; 17(4): 187–196.
34.
Bates-JensenBMVredevoeDLBrechtML. Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Decubitus1992; 5(6): 20–8.
