The episodic acute care model of service delivery that consumes the majority of healthcare funding is inadequate to meet the needs of a society experiencing an increasing burden of chronic illness. This article describes, in a regional Canadian healthcare context, the application and preliminary evaluation of a model of chronic care delivery developed in a managed care environment in the United States. The strategic goals of this model are to empower clients by providing a redesigned service delivery environment that supports self-management; support care providers by developing clinical information systems and decision supports; and align community resources, policies and organization of care to support an informed, activated client and a proactive practice team.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Statistics Canada.Health statistics at a glance. Ottawa; 1999.
2.
UlysseP. Population aging: An overview of the past 30 years. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1997.
3.
National Advisory Council on Aging.1999 and beyond: Challenges of an aging Canadian society. Ottawa: The Council; 1999.
4.
BringewattRJ. Healthcare's next big hurdle. Healthcare Forum Journal1998 September/October:14–18.
5.
Health Canada.Diabetes in Canada: National statistics and opportunities for improved surveillance, prevention, and control. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1999.
6.
ZinmanB. Diabetes: Magnitude of the problem. In: Canadian Diabetes Association. National Forum on Diabetes. The Association; 1998.
7.
RubinRJAltmanWMMendelsonDN. Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism1992; 78; 809A–809F.
8.
National Diabetes Data Group.Diabetes in America (2nd ed.). National Institutes of Health; 1995.
9.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine1993; 329; 977–986.
10.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Lancet1998; 352: 837–853.
11.
LeveilleSGWagnerEHDavisCGrothausLWallaceJLoGerfoM. Preventing disability and managing chronic illness in frail elderly: A randomized trial of a community-based partnership with primary care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society1998; 46: 1191–1198.
12.
EastmanRCJavittJCHermanWHDasbachEJCopley-MerrimanCMaierW. Model of complications of NIDDM: Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia. Diabetes Care1997; 20(5): 735–744.
13.
GilmerTPO'ConnorPJManningWGRushWA. The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care1997; 20(12): 1847–1853.
14.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.Resource utilization and costs of care in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care199518: 1468–1478.
15.
WagnerEHAustinBTVon KorffM. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Managed Care Quarterly1996; 4(2): 12–25.
16.
WagnerEHDavisCSchaeferJVon KorffMAustinB. A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: Are they consistent with the literature?Managed Care Quarterly1999; 7(3): 56–66.
17.
Canadian Diabetes Association. 1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal1998; 159(8 Suppl): s1–s29.
18.
StewartWA. Economic control of manufactured product. New York: Van Nostrand; 1931. (Reprinted Milwaukee (WI): American Society for Quality Control; 1980).
19.
LangleyGJNolanKMNolanTW. The foundation of improvement. Silver Spring (MD): API Publishing; 1992.
20.
BerwickDMNolanTW. Physicians as leaders in improving healthcare: A new series in Annals of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine1998; 128(4): 289–292.
21.
BerwickDM. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. British Medical Journal1996 March 9;312: 619–622.
22.
RogersE. The diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1995.
23.
McCullochDK. A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: Early results and lessons learned. Effective Clinical Practice1998; 1(1): 12–22.
24.
ClarkNMGongM. Management of chronic disease by practitioners and patients: Are we teaching them the wrong things. British Medical Journal2000 February;320: 572–575.
