This article explores the similarities, differences and overlaps among research, evaluation and quality measurement. Criteria for determining the differences are offered as a quick guide to differentiating among them. These criteria are the purpose of the project, generalizability, intended use of the findings, intended subjects and intent to prove causation. Determining the key differences among research, evaluation and quality measurement facilitates the choice of restrictions, supports and reporting process that should be applied to each.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Code of Ethical Conduct for Research Involving humans, Tri-Council Working Group. (June 1998).
WayJRLundDAAtkinsonCC. Quality assurance in human service program evaluation. In: AtkinsonCCHargreavesWAHorowitzMJ, editors. Evaluation in human service programs. New York Academic Press; 1978.
4.
ScrivenM., Claremont Graduate University, United States, e-mail communication, January 1998.
5.
R. Endias, Stryker and Endias, Inc., Kalamazoo, Mich., personal communication on planning, evaluation and research services, January 1998.
