Health regions in Canada are responsible for meeting the needs of local populations with limited resources. However, relatively little attention has been given to this within-region resource allocation problem. An economic approach to needs assessment, namely program budgeting and marginal analysis, may be of benefit. Its potential for use in Canada is examined, in particular with examples from two Alberta health regions, the Calgary Regional Health Authority and the Chinook Health Region.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LomasJVeenstraGWoodsJ.Devolving authority for healthcare in Canada's provinces: 2. Backgrounds, resources and activities of board members. Canadian Medical Association Journal1997; 156(4): 513–520.
2.
Alberta Health. Alberta Health: A three year business plan 1995–96 to 1997–98. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 1995.
3.
EylesJBirchS.A population needs-based approach to health-care resource allocation and planning in Ontario: A link between policy goals and practice?Canadian Journal of Public Health1993; 84(2): 112–7.
4.
HutchisonBHurleyJReidRDorlandJBirchSGiacominiM,. Capitation formulae for integrated health systems: A policy synthesis. Final report submitted to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 1999.
5.
DonaldsonCFarrarS.Needs assessment: Developing an economic approach. Health Policy1993; 25: 95–108.
6.
DonaldsonCMooneyG.Needs assessment, priority setting, and contracts for healthcare: An economic view. British Medical Journal1991; 303: 1529–1530.
7.
DonaldsonC.Economics, public health and purchasing: Reinventing the wheel?Health Policy1995; 33: 79–90.
8.
RutaDDonaldsonCGilrayI.Economics, public health and purchasing: The Tayside experience of program budgeting and marginal analysis. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy1996; 1(4): 185–193.
9.
ScottADonaldsonCScottS.Program budgeting and marginal analysis: Pragmatism and policy (editorial) Journal of Health Services Research and Policy1999; 4(1): 1–2.
10.
BirchSChambersS.To each according to need: A community-based approach to allocating resources. Canadian Medical Association Journal1993; 149: 607–612.
11.
StevensARafteryJ editors. Needs assessment: The epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews: Second series. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1997.
12.
GerardKMooneyG.QALY league tables: Handle with care. Health Economics1993; 259–64.
13.
CohenD.Messages from Mid Glamorgan: A multi-programme experiment with marginal analysis. Health Policy1995; 33: 147–155.
14.
TwaddleSWalkerA.Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: Application within programmes to assist purchasing in Greater Glasgow Health Board. Health Policy1995; 33: 91–105.
15.
PeacockSEdwardsD.Setting priorities in South Australian community health: The mental health program budget. Melbourne: Center for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University; 1997.
16.
MittonCDonaldsonC.Where are we now? Tw—five years of PBMA. Forthcoming.
17.
LastJ.A dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
18.
FrohlichNMustardC.A regional comparison of socioeconomic and health indices in a Canadian province. Social Science and Medicine1996; 42(9): 1273–1281.
19.
MillerPParkinDCraigNLewisDGerardK.Less fog on the Tyne? Programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside. Health Policy1997; 40: 217–229.
20.
MooneyGRussellEWeirR.Choices for healthcare: A practical introduction to the economics of health provision. London: Macmillan; 1986.
21.
MooneyGHaasMVineyRCooperL.Linking health outcomes to priority setting, planning and resource allocation. New South Wales, Australia: Center for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Sydney; 1997.
