Although substantial resources have been spent developing clinical practice guidelines, little effort has been made to evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation. In the absence of effective implementation, CPGs will have minimal impact on changing behaviours. This article critically reviews the literature and identifies a number of reasons why these guidelines have not been implemented successfully. If CPGs are to have a positive impact upon clinical behaviour and practice, then more aggressive and positive implementation strategies are indicated. Five key ingredients for successful implementation of quality CPGs are identified and recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BasinkskiAS. Evaluation of clinical practice and guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal1995 Dec;153(11): 1575–1581.
2.
FieldJMLohrKN. Guidelines for clinical practice: From development to use. Washington (DC):National Academy Press; 1992.
3.
RocheNDurieuxP. Clinical practice guidelines: From methodological to practical issues. Intensive Care Medicine1994; 20(8): 593–601.
4.
LomasJ. Words without action? The production, dissemination and impact of consensus recommendations. Annual Review of Public Health1991; 12: 41–61.
5.
WoolfSHDiGuiseppiCGAtkinsDKamerowDB. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: Lessons learned by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Annual Review of Public Health1996; 17: 511–538.
6.
EddyDM. Clinical policies and quality of clinical practice. New England Journal of Medicine1982; 307: 343–347.
7.
HumphrisD. Clinical guidelines: An industry for growth. Nursing Times1994;(40):46–7.
8.
EisenbergJM. Doctor's decisions and the cost of medical care: The reasons for doctors' practice patterns and ways to change them. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Administration Press; 1986.
9.
BrookRHLohrK. Efficacy, effectiveness, variations and quality: Boundary-crossing research. Medical Care1985; 23: 710–22.
10.
AndersonGMLomasJ. Explaining variations in Cesarean section rates: Patients, facilities or policies?Canadian Medical Association Journal1985; 132: 253–59.
11.
LomasJAndersonGMEnkinM. The role of evidence in the consensus process: Results from a Canadian consensus exercise. Journal of the American Medical Association1988; 259: 3001–05.
12.
LomasJAndersonGMDomnick-PierreK. Do practice guidelines guide practice?The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine1989; 321: 1306–11.
13.
CarterAOBasinskiABattistaRNDavisDHodgeMJLewisS. Report on activities and attitudes of organizations active in the clinical practice guidelines field. Canadian Medical Association Journal1995 Oct;153(7): 901–907.
14.
GottliegLMargolisCZSchoenbaumS. Clinical practice guidelines at an HMO: Development and implementation in a quality improvement model. Quality Review Bulletin1990; 16: 80–86.
15.
LomasJ. The consensus process and evidence dissemination. Canadian Medical Association Journal1986; 134: 1340–41.
16.
MayWE. Consensus or coercion. Journal of the American Medical Association1985; 254: 1077.
17.
OwensDKNeaseRFJr. Development of outcome-based practice guidelines: A method for structuring problems and synthesizing evidence. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement1993; 19(7): 248–263.
18.
Canadian Task Force Period Health Examination.The Period Health Examination. Canadian Medical Association Journal1979; 121: 1193–254.
19.
BergerJTRosnerF. The ethics of practice guidelines. Archives of Internal Medicine October1996; 156(18): 2051–2056.
20.
LomasJ. Making clinical policy explicit: Legislative policy making and lessons for developing practice guidelines. International Journal of Technology and Assessment in healthcare1993; 9(1): 11–25.
21.
Symposium on Ergonomics in Drug Delivery.Conference report. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesiology1997; 44(7): 782–783.
22.
BlegenMAReiterRCGoodeCJMurphyRR. Outcomes of hospital-based managed care: A multivariate analysis of cost and quality. Obstetrics and Gynecology1995; 86: 809–814.
23.
LomasJ. Diffusion, dissemination and implementation: Who should do what?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1993; 703: 226–35.
24.
DarbyM. 12 ways to get physician buy-in to practice guidelines. The Quality Letter for Healthcare Leaders1998; 10(3): 2–8.
25.
GrimshawJMRusellIT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet1993; 342: 1317–22.
26.
LomasJHaynesRB. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: From “official” to “individual” clinical policy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine1988; 4(suppl): 77–94.
27.
LomasJEnkinMAndersonGM. Opinion leaders versus audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous Cesarean section. Journal of the American Medical Association1991; 265: 2202–07.
28.
GreerAL. The state of the art versus the state of the science: The diffusion of new medical technologies into practice. International Journal of Technology and Assessment in healthcare1988; 4: 5–26.
29.
SoumeraiSBAvornJ. Principles of educational outreach (academic detailing) to improve clinical decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association1990; 263: 549–56.
30.
Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991. Statutes of Ontario. Toronto: Queen's Printer; 1991.
31.
TaylorDW. The relationship marketing of nurse practitioners: How to be part of the solution. In: PattersonC, editor. Visions and voices: The nurse practitioner today. Rev. ed.Toronto: Lugus Publications; 1999.
32.
BastianH. Raising the standard: Practice guidelines and consumer participation. International Journal for Quality in Health care October1996; 8(5): 485–490.
33.
Striking a new balance: A blueprint for the regulation of Ontario's health professions.Health Professions Legislative Review. Toronto: Queen's Printer; 1989.
34.
Reforming healthcare workforce regulation: Policy considerations for the 21st Century. Pew Health Professions Commission; December 1995, San Francisco.
35.
LandoM. Making compliance part of your organization's culture. Healthcare Executive1999 Sept/Oct:18–22.
36.
McCarthyCM. Physicians and compliance. Healthcare Executive1998 Mar/Apr:43.
