This article describes the results of a 15-month pilot project to determine whether producers and users of organizations' research findings can synthesize and disseminate evidence collaboratively. The findings of the project suggest that the collaborative approach is a feasible but costly endeavor owing to differences in need, expertise, experience and context. Funding agencies should consider alternative ways to build sustainable partnerships and to address the cultural and political contexts of organizations involved with the synthesis and dissemination of evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LomasJ. Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: Beyond the sound of one hand clapping. A report for the Advisory Committee on Health Services to the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Conference of Deputy Ministers. Ottawa (ON); 1997.
2.
HaynesRBHaywardRSALomasJ. Bridges between healthcare research evidence and clinical practice. J of Amer Med Informatics Assoc1995; 2: 342–350.
3.
HuthEJ. The underused medical literature. Annals of Internal Medicine1989; 110(2): 99–100.
4.
WilliamsonJWGermanPSWeissRSkinnerEA. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine1989; 110: 151–160.
5.
FrenkJ. Balancing relevance and excellence: Organizational responses to link research with decision making. Social Sci and Med1992; 35(11): 1397–1404.
6.
McKibbonKAWilczynskiNHaywardRSWalker-DilksCJ. The medical literature as a resource for healthcare practice. J of the Amer Soc for Info Sci1995; 46(10): 737–742.
7.
OxmanADCookDJGuyattGH. Users' guide to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. J of Amer Med Assoc1994; 272(17): 1367–1371.
8.
ThackerSB. Meta-analysis: A quantitative approach to research integration. J of Amer Med Assoc1988; 259(11): 1685–1689.
9.
UsherS. From research to practice; from research to policy. Health Policy Forum1998 Oct-Nov:17–20.
10.
ChalmersU. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare. Annals of N.Y. Acad of Sciences1993; 703: 156–165.
CiliskiDHaywardSThomasHMitchellA. A systematic overview of the effectiveness of home visiting as a delivery strategy for public health nursing interventions. Can J of Pub Hlth1996; 87(3): 193–198.
13.
PloegJCiliskaDDobbinsMHaywardS. A systematic overview of adolescent suicide prevention programs. Can J of Pub Hlth1996; 87(5): 319–324.
14.
HaywardSCiliskaDMitchell-DicensoAThomasH. Evaluation research in public health: Barriers to the production of outcome date. Can J of Pub Health871996; (6): 413: 7.
15.
Task Force on Research in Practice.Research in practice in the Alberta health system. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; May 1999.
16.
GrayJAM. Evidence-based healthcare: How to make health policy and management decisions. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
17.
KingLHawePWiseM. Making dissemination a two-way process. Health Promotion International1998; 13(3): 237–244.
18.
National Health Forum.Creating a culture of evidence-based decision making in health. Ottawa: The Forum; 1997.
All faculty and library staff had prior research experience, as did some host representatives on the teams.
21.
Data collection instruments used in the project are available from the authors on request.
22.
The educational backgrounds of members from host organizations range from two-year diploma programs to four-year professional licensing to variable education levels for the consumer group.
