Un leadership solide est nécessaire afin de pouvoir réformer le système de santé de manière responsable et transparente. Cet article examine le contexte des programmes de développement du leadership et les conditions menant à leur succès, tel que mesuré par l'efficacité des résultats observés. L'article comprend un examen sur l'évaluation du rendement du leadership dans la perspective du processus de rétroaction à 360 degrés. Compte tenu du climat qui prévaut à l'heure actuelle dans les soins de santé, il faut faire preuve de prudence dans la mise en place de programmes de formation en leadership et du processus de rétroaction à 360 degrés.
LeveySHillJGreeneB. Leadership in healthcare and the leadership literature. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management2002; 25(2): 68–74.
4.
Queensland Health.Queensland health leadership development framework. Australia: Queensland Government [on-line] 1999 [cited 2003 June 24]. Available from: http://www.qld.gov.au
5.
NHS.NHS leaders: A career development and succession planning scheme. UK: NHS [on-line] 2003 [cited 2003 June 18]. Available from: http://www.doh.gov.uk
CouslandA., Providence Healthcare, personal communication, 2003 16 Jun.
8.
Peterborough Regional Health Centre. Departments and services: Organizational effectiveness and learning. ON: The Regional Health Centre [on-line] 2003 [cited 2003 Jul 30]. Available from: http://www.prhc.on.ca/department/o/org_learn.asp
9.
WoottonK., Toronto Hospital for Sick Children, personal communication, 2003 Jul 30.
10.
CongerJABenjaminB. Building leaders: How successful companies develop the next generation. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1999.
11.
CongerJA. Learning to lead: The art of transforming managers into leaders. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1992.
12.
BennisWNanusB. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row; 1985.
13.
KotterJ. What leaders really do. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press; 1999.
14.
KouzesJMPosnerBZ. The leadership challenge: How to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1995.
15.
GolemanD. What makes a leader. Harvard Business Review1998; 76(6): 93–104.
KotterJ. The leadership factor. New York: The Free Press; 1988.
18.
KingT. Paradigms of Canadian nurse managers: Lenses for viewing leadership and management. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration2000; 13(1): 15–20.
19.
South Western Sydney Area Health Service.South Western Sydney area health service competency based management development program. New South Wales: The Area Health Service; 2001.
20.
Alimo-MetcalfeB. 360-degree feedback and leadership development. International Journal of Selection and Assessment1998; 6(1): 35–44.
21.
DayDV. Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly2000; 11(4): 581–613.
22.
PayneT. 360 degree assessment and feedback. Editorial. International Journal of Selection and Assessment1998; 6(1): 16–18.
23.
VinsonMN. The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback: Making it work. Training Development1996; 50(4): 11–12.
Leaderskill Group. 360 facilitated. Australia: The Group; 1999.
26.
BrackenDWTimmreckCWFleenorJWSummersL. 360 feedback from another angle. Human Resource Management2001; 40(1): 3–20.
27.
FletcherC. Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology2001; 74: 473–487.
28.
DavisJ., Fraser Health Authority, personal communication, 2003 14 Jul.
29.
WoltringCConstantineWSchwarteL. Does leadership training make a difference? The CDC/UC public health leadership institute: 1991–1999. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice2003; 9(2): 103–122.
30.
AbouyanniH., SWSAHS, personal communication, 2003 18 Jun.
31.
VanceCLarsonE. Leadership research in business and healthcare. Journal of Nursing Scholarship2002; 34(2): 165–172.
32.
PhilpotADevittRParrJ. Competency-based leadership selection case study: Peterborough regional health centre. Healthcare Management Forum2002; 15(4): 55–58.
ShorttSEDMacDonaldJK. Toward an accountability framework for Canadian healthcare. Healthcare Management Forum2002; 15(2): 24–32.
35.
Health Canada.Healthcare renewal accord 2003: 2003 first ministers' accord on healthcare renewal. Ottawa: Government of Canada [on-line] 2003 [cited 2003 Jul 10]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.bc.ca/english/hca2003/accord.html
36.
LukeRModrowR. An accountability framework for the measure of quality. In: HinmanEI, editor. Advanced medical system—health decision systems. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1980. p. 29–37.
37.
ModrowR. Four concepts of accountability. Healthcare & Epidemiology Alumni Association Newsletter1998; 15(1): 1–2.
38.
GoodwinN. Leadership in the UK NHS: Where are we now?Journal of Management in Medicine1998; 12(1): 21–32.
39.
Auditor General of British Columbia Deputy Ministers' Council.Enhancing accountability for performance: A framework and an implementation plan second joint report. Victoria (BC): Government of British Columbia; 1996.
40.
SmithP. Performance management in British healthcare: Will it deliver?Health Affairs2002; 21(3): 103–115.
41.
GoreA. Speech at national press club luncheon Monday, March 4, 1996. Washington, DC: Federal News Services, Inc; 1996.
42.
Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia.2003–04 report 1: A review of performance agreements between the ministry of health services and the health authorities. Victoria (BC): Provincial Government [on-line] 2003 [cited 2003 Jun 3]. Available from: http://www.bcauditor.com/AuditorGeneral.htm
43.
RathwellTPersaudDD. Running to stand still: Change and management in Canadian healthcare. Healthcare Management Forum2002; 15(3): 10–17.
44.
GoddardMMannionR. From competition to co-operation: New economic relationships in the national health service. Health Economics1998; 7: 105–119.
45.
SengePM. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency; 1990.
46.
FletcherC. Circular agreement. People Management1998; 4(9): 46,49.
47.
CordeiroLNewmanL. The 3600 feedback process: A tool for continuous board improvement. Healthcare Management Forum2001; 14(1): 42–44.
