This paper presents research results that offer answers to the “why,” “what” and “how” of work climate measurement. It also submits to the scientific community a confirmatory cross-validation procedure applied to a new measurement tool, consistent with the works of Jones and James's (1979) and of Parker et al. (2003) on psychological climate. The results depict a good model fit for both the English and French versions of the questionnaire. This new instrument offers a comprehensive and manageable approach for the development of a healthy workplace.
Quality Worklife Quality Healthcare Collaborative.Within our grasp. A healthy workplace action strategy for success and sustainability in Canada's health care system. Ottawa, ON: Accreditation Canada; 2008.
3.
KoffkaK. Principles of Gestalt theory. New York: Hartcourt; 1935.
4.
LewinK. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1936.
5.
LewinK. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Bros; 1951.
6.
SchneiderB. Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology1975; 28: 447–479.
7.
SchneiderBReichersAE. On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology1983; 36: 19–39.
8.
HellriegelDSlocumJWJr. Organizational climate: Measures research and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal1974; 17: 255–280.
9.
BrunetLSavoieA. Le climat de travail. Montréal, QC: Les Éditions Logiques; 1999.
10.
FoucherRSoucyG. Le climat organizationnel. In: TessierRTellierY, editors. Changement planifié et développement des organizations. T. 4: Pouvoirs et cultures organizationnels (pp. 197–232). Presses de l'Université du Québec.
11.
LitwinGStringerR. Motivation and organizational climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1968.
12.
RousseauDM. The construction of climate in organizational research. In: CooperCLRobertsonI, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 139–158). Chicago, IL: Wiley; 1988.
13.
JonesAPJamesLR. Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptionsOrganizational Behaviour and Human Performance1979; 23: 201–250.
14.
PattersonMGWestMAShackletonVJDawsonJFLawthomRMaitlisS. Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour2005; 26: 379–408.
15.
GlickHW. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management1985; 10(3): 601–616.
16.
JamesLRJonesAP. Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin1974; 81(12): 1096–1112.
17.
MoranETVolkweinJF. The cultural approach to the formation of organizational climate. Human Relations1992; 45: 19–47.
18.
JohannessonRE. Some problems in the measurement of organizational climate. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance1973; 10: 118–144.
19.
VerbekeWVolgeringMHesselsM. Exploring the conceptual expansion within the field of organizational behaviour: Organizational climate and organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies1998; 35(3): 303–329.
20.
ForehandGGilmerB. Environmental variation in studies of organizational behaviour. Psychological Bulletin1964; 62: 361–382.
21.
InksonJHPughDSHicksonDJ. Organization context and structure: An abbreviated replication. Administrative Science Quarterly1970; 15: 318–329.
22.
PayneRFPughD. Organizational structure and climate. In: DunetteMD, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1125–1173). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1976.
23.
AshforthBE. Climate formation: Issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review1985; 10(4): 837–847.
24.
PooleMSMcPheeRD. A structural analysis of organizational climate. In: PutnamLIPaconowskyME, editors. Communication and organizations. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage; 1983.
25.
EkehammarB. Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin1974; 81: 1026–1048.
26.
JamesLRHaterJJGentMJBruniJR. Psychological climate: Implications from cognitive social learning theory and interactional psychology. Personnel Psychology1978; 31: 783–813.
27.
JamesLRSellsSB. Psychological climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. In: MagnussonD, editor. Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 275–295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981.
28.
LewinK. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Bros.; 1978.
29.
BowersDG. Systems or organizations: Management of the human resource. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan; 1977.
30.
LikertR. New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1961.
31.
LikertR. The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.
32.
ParkerCPBaltesBBYoungSAHuffJWAltmannRALaCostHA. Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behaviour2003; 24: 389–416.
33.
CeriaCD. Nursing absenteeism and its effects on the quality of patient care. Journal of Nursing Administration1992; 22(12): 11, 38.
34.
ShamianJO'Brien-PallasLThomsonDAlksnisCKerrMS. Nurse absenteeism, stress and workplace injury: What are the contributing factors and what can/should be done about it?The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy2003; 23: 8/9, 81–103.
35.
GellatlyIR. Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. Journal of Organizational Behaviour1995; 16(5): 469–485.
36.
HarterTW. Minimizing absenteeism in the workplace: Strategies for nurse managers. Nursing Economics2001; 19(2): 53–55.
WashingtonK. The health risks of mandatory overtime. The hidden costs of this all-too-common practice. American Journal of Nursing2001; 101(5): 96.
39.
RogersAEHwangW-TScottLDAikenLHDingesDF. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Affairs2004; 23(4): 202–212.
40.
BerneyBNeedlemanJ. Impact of nursing overtime on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in New York hospitals, 1995–2000. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice2006; 7(2): 87–100.
41.
LathamGPYulkGA. A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 197;18: 824–845.
42.
SkarlickiDPFolgerR. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology1997; 82(3): 434–443.
43.
GagnonSPaquetMLavoie-TremblayMCourcyF. Programme inter établissement de recherche action sur le climat de travail: Rapport final. 2008. Healthy Workplaces Initiative Program. Office of Nursing Policy, Health Policy Branch, Health Canada. Available from: http://www.criso.ca/fr/news/100
44.
ArchambaultJBrunetLGoupilG. Directions d'école et ensei-gnants face au stress: Le role du climat organizationnel dans l'anxiété. Montréal, PQ: Faculté des sciences de l'éducation de l'Université de Montréal; 1984.
45.
MichelaJLLukaszewskiMPAllegranteJP. Organizational climate and work stress: A general framework applied to inner-city school teachers. In: SauterSLMurphyLR, editors. Organizational risk factors for job stress (pp. 61–80). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association; 1995.
46.
CourcyFHarveySBelleauBMarceauARochonA. Work climate and professional exhaustion. Proceedings of the 14e Congress of Francophone International Association of Work Psychology, Hammamet, Tunisie. July, 2006.
47.
ZoharD. Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoritical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology1980; 29(1): 96–102.
48.
GagnonSPaquetMCourcyF. Psychological climate and healthy workplaces. Proceedings of the 15e Congress of Francophone International Association of Work Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, August, 2008.
49.
JamesLRGentMJHaterJJCorayGE. Correlates of psychological influence: An illustration of the psychological climate approach to work environment perceptions. Personnel Psychology1979; 32: 563–588.
50.
BowersDGTaylorJC. Survey of organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan; 1970.
51.
DuxburyMLHenlyGAArmstrongGD. Measurement of the nurse organizational climate of neonatal intensive care units. Nursing Research1982; 31(2): 83–88.
52.
JamesLAJamesLR. Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology1989; 74(5): 739–751.
LikertR. The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.
55.
MoosRHInselPM. The work environment scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.; 1974.
56.
PritchardRPKarasickBW. The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance1973; 9: 126–146.
57.
RoyF. Élaboration et validation d'un questionnaire sur le climat de travail. Master's in Psychology thesis. Université de Montréal, Montréal, PQ; 1989.
58.
SavoieCSavoieABrunetL. Validation de construit du questionnaire sur le climat de travail (QCT). (Research report). Montréal, PQ: Université de Montréal; 1994.
59.
YoungSAParkerCP. Predicting collective climates: Assessing the role of shared work values, needs, employee interaction and work group membership. Journal of Organizational Behaviour1999; 20: 1199–1218.
60.
GershonRRMStonePWBakkenSLarsonE. Measurement of organizational culture and climate in healthcare. Journal of Nursing Administration2004; 34(1): 33–40.
61.
GavinJF. Organizational climate as a function of 61. and organizational variables. Journal of Applied Psychology1975; 60(1): 135–139.
62.
LawlerEEHallDTOldhamGR. Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process and performance. Organizational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes1974; 11: 139–155.
63.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
64.
BrislinRW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisHCBerryJW, editors. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2., methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1980.
65.
MarshHWHocevarD. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin1985; 97: 62–582.
66.
VandenbergRJLanceCE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods2000; 3: 4–69.
67.
BrowneMWArmingerG. Specification and estimation of mean- and covariance-structure models. In: ArmingerGCloggCSobalM, editors. Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioural sciences. New York: Plenum; 1995.
68.
LittleTD. Mean and covariance structure (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioural Research1997; 32: 213–219.
69.
MedskerGWilliamsLJHolahanPJ. A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behaviour and human resources management. Journal of Management1994; 20: 439–464.
70.
TanakaJS. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In: BollenKALongJS, editors. Structural equation models (pp. 11–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993.
71.
SunJ. Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development2005; 37: 240–256.
HuLBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling1999; 6: 1–55.
74.
BrowneMWCudeckR. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS, editors. Structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993.
75.
GagnonSLavoie-TremblayM. The key factors of work climate improvement in Quebec health care and social services organizations. Proceedings of the 15e Congress of the Francophone International Association of Work Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, August, 2008.
76.
HuntJW. Changing organizations. In: HuntJW, editor. Managing people at work (3rd ed., pp. 259–300). London: McGraw-Hill International Ltd.; 1992.
